Shuuuooooo! Verboten Subject: The Power of the Jewish Lobby and Jewish NeoCons

I had two extended and interesting exchanges with a Jewish woman, a strong "conservative" by all appearances, who claims to be an "America First" loyalist, yet she defended violently the so-called wisdom of allowing Dual American-Israeli Citizenship.

You see, I am against Dual Citizenship period, no matter what nation is on the other end of that hyphenation "America- *.*

This person, who in every way in years of FB friendship seemed perfectly reasonable and intelligent, suddenly turned "tribal" when I DARED to express my objection to dual citizenship and stated what is absolutely true, that since the Jewish population of the U.S. is about 1.5 percent, it is OBVIOUS from even a cursory observation that Jews are over-represented in every "influential" area of American life, including publishing, all of the media, the FAKE NEWS, the NeoCon Conspirators, the Marxist-Radical-Left, etc., etc. This is not anti-Jewish, merely making the obvious observation of FACT, yet her reaction to me - the reason I call it violent - was to label me an ignorant anti-Semite.

Those of you who know me know how ridiculous this charge is, but at the risk of enduring more opprobrium from the tribal mentality, it is not inappropriate for Americans to be concerned about the disproportionate power of the Jewish/Israeli Lobby. It is real and it is NOT America First, anything but, it was/is the driving force (the NeoCon force) that has created the last years of American Perpetual War.

So what is the reaction when you dare to state some things about the power of AIPAC, the Jewish Lobby will come after you like the Marxist, and using Saul Alinsky methods, you are a racist and a bigot, by simply stating the REALTY of the disproportionate representation and power of the Jewish/Israeli Lobby.  Whenever this happens, you know that the force coming against you is EVIL. Were it not OF THE LIAR, reasonable and rational dialog would be possible. But when histrionics seeks to silence FACT, what Alinsky called "Jamming" the evidence is too clear to be denied.

I spoke with my Jewish friend with measured politeness and reason, explaining that my concern was "generic" and would be the same caution were so many of our government officials and "thought manufacturers" dual citizens American-Russian, American-British, American-German, American-Japanese. This reasonable position was met with:

"The "Zionist" lobby? I have no idea what you think happened in Jerusalem, but you should check the source of your information, because, whether you're aware of it or not, you're regurgitating anti-Semitic talking points from 'The Protocols." (Actually, I was referencing the pages of the New Testament and Jewish Roman Historian, Josephus.) Israel is the only Middle Eastern country where Christians are thriving under the same rights and laws as Israelis. When you attack Israel with the lies and vitriol that you have here, you're attacking the Jews, and I don't have the time, energy, or desire anymore to debate you based on century's old lies, jeolousy, fear, and hatred that you're hell bent on harboring and defending."

So what were the lies and vitriol told against the modern state of Israel? The historical fact that Israel acts in its own self-interest without exception up to and including conducting massive spying operations upon the U.S., for which over the years multiple people have been charged, convicted and imprisoned (some of the worse security breaches in our history) and that they attacked one of our Navy Ships, KNOWING it was a U.S. ship, knocking out its communications and hoping to sink it before anyone could stop it. (Reference "The U.S.S. LIBERTY.")  These are facts NOT lies, NOT jealousy, NOT fear, NOT hatred, NOT vitriol.  What it is, is history the Jewish lobby and those whose primary loyalty is to Israel DO NOT want to be told and rehearsed in public debate. The entire question of the viability of the policy of dual-citizenship, America's reasonable responsibility to and for Israel, and the disproportionate representation of Jews in the public square, the halls of governance etc., is a Verboten Subject.

I use the word VERBOTEN, (the German word) instead of forbidden since it is the specter of the Holocaust that is used as the 911 psyop, to keep the world treating Jews as eternal victims. Tens of millions more died in the Holodomor, another genocide that occurred in the same time frame and most of you have NEVER HEARD OF the Holodomor where mostly Christians died.

Why is this? The logical answer is, let us investigate who writes and publishes the history books to discover the reason for this breach of historical reality.  But the mere suggestion is "Jew Hating", that is anti-Semitic.  BTW, the term anti-Semitic is a term created by the Marxists-Leftist Jewish Hate Group called the "Anti-Defamation League."  As all things Marxist, its name represents the opposite of what it is. Its purpose and function, historically provable and CURRENTLY VISIBLE, (as in last week's attack on Valerie Plame Wilson and the perpetual attack upon Ex-CIA whistleblower Philip Giraldi), is to RITUALLY DEFAME anyone who Dares challenge the Jewish/Israeli Lobby and the Jewish Tribal influence over American foreign policy.

Now, if you take exception to me using the term TRIBAL as relating to Jews, let me share with you my Jewish friend's description of this Tribalism, many of which I have witnessed in the past, To WIT:

"Lisa Michelle Goldstein:
Yes, G-d certainly did disproportionately endow the Jewish people with special qualities that enabled them to survive thousands of years of persecution. It's unprecedented in history. In fact, Jewish survival is a miracle, but we can't help it if it's in our DNA. Just because people don't understand it, doesn't mean there's a conspiracy behind it.

With that said, this post was not directed to you, Butch, but you chose to weigh in here. I do not deny that a majority of those who happen to be born Jewish worship a Leftist ideology, but that IS their religion. It in no way is a reflection of Judaism and actually conflicts with it. History will not look kindly upon them. They have betrayed their own people, but Judaism has nothing to do with the human tendencies towards power and greed. It's not an exclusively Jewish condition.

Either way, Zionism dates as far back as Abraham and the Babylonian Conquest. We pray for our return to Zion every single day, just as most Christians do. It's in our daily prayers.

And to answer your question, no. I am second-generation American born, but that should be irrelevant. All Jews should be Zionists. Religious practicing Jews who pray for the Jewish return to Zion and believe in the Jewish right to self-determination - or even Israeli-Americans with dual citizenship - lean to the right and tend to be loyal to Conservative Constitutional values and principles. It's the majority of Leftist Jews, who have no loyalty or connection to Judaism, Israel, and the Jewish people, who you and I have to worry about."

That is a perfect definition of Tribalism, she stated it clearly, a SUPREMACY of DNA.

What prompted this conversation was the Ritual Defamation of Valerie Plame Wilson for DARING against Tribal Taboo, (Valerie is Jewish) to re-tweet an article by Philip Giraldi, outlining the correlation between the Jewish Lobby and the American NeoCon movement, so many being DUAL American-Israeli Citizens. If we look at the piece of American foreign policy that has been most damaging to the U.S. and to the WORLD, it was conceived by the Masters of a Temporary Think Tank, that produced a plan, a document, a conspiracy, for America in the 21st Century, called, "the Project for the New American Century" (PNAC) which was in reality, the Project for ZIONIST GOALS.  The original document, (scrubbed from the internet) called for "a New Pearl Harbor" incident to galvanize public opinion around their conquest plan. Many have speculated that 911 was that incident and created in the manner of Machiavelli. (A False Flag Event for psyops purposes)

Here is General Wesley Clark expressing his amazement having stumbled upon the plan post 911.

+++

+++

I take exception to the idea that this perpetual war in the Middle East is about Oil, or even economics. Didn't he name in this list of seven countries Libya (minimal oil producer) and Somalia? Is Somalia an oil producer?  (I could be wrong here - but I think that ideology and not economic is the driver here.)

Here is the article by Philip Gilraldi re-tweeted by Valerie Plame, causing the dogs of hell to attack.
Linked here and mirrored below:
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/americas-jews-are-driving-americas-wars/
Scroll down past this article for a definitive Video on the Subject:
Mirror Transcript in case the original is ever scrubbed from the media:

America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars

Philip Giraldi • September 19, 2017 • 1,600 Words • 1,271 Comments • Reply

9-11 minutes

---

UPDATE: On the morning of September 21st Phil Giraldi was fired over the phone by The American Conservative, where he had been a regular contributor for fourteen years. He was told that “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” was unacceptable. The TAC management and board appear to have forgotten that the magazine was launched with an article by founder Pat Buchanan entitled “Whose War?” which largely made the same claims that Giraldi made about the Jewish push for another war, in that case with Iraq. Buchanan was vilified and denounced as an anti-Semite by many of the same people who are now similarly attacking Giraldi.

I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war party where afterwards an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “Why doesn’t anyone ever speak honestly about the six-hundred-pound gorilla in the room? Nobody has mentioned Israel in this conference and we all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are supporting every war in the Middle East for Netanyahu? Shouldn’t we start calling them out and not letting them get away with it?”

It was a question combined with a comment that I have heard many times before and my answer is always the same: any organization that aspires to be heard on foreign policy knows that to touch the live wire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from the offending party ever again. They are particularly sensitive on the issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have real loyalty to Israel.

Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been warning of an impending war with Iran. To be sure, the urging to strike Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration who always think first in terms of settling problems through force, from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and, of course, from Israel itself. But what makes the war engine run is provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten the United States. They have been very successful at faking the Iranian threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic congressmen as well as much of the media seem to be convinced that Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S. military, and the sooner the better.

And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker on stopping the impending war with Iran strangely suggests that the current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq. The article cites as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol and Bret Stephens.

Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,” which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking. If they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another. There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”

And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations; Meyrav Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute. And you can also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives. And I might add that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve. These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.

So it is safe to say that much of the agitation to do something about Iran comes from Israel and from American Jews. Indeed, I would opine that most of the fury from Congress re Iran comes from the same source, with AIPAC showering our Solons on the Potomac with “fact sheets” explaining how Iran is worthy of annihilation because it has pledged to “destroy Israel,” which is both a lie and an impossibility as Tehran does not have the resources to carry out such a task. The AIPAC lies are then picked up and replayed by an obliging media, where nearly every “expert” who speaks about the Middle East on television and radio or who is interviewed for newspaper stories is Jewish.

One might also add that neocons as a group were founded by Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby. Yes, all Jewish and all conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of course. Philip Zelikow, also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his opinion, was fought for Israel.

Add to the folly a Jewish U.S. Ambassador to Israel who identifies with the most right-wing Israeli settler elements, a White House appointed chief negotiator who is Jewish and a Jewish son-in-law who is also involved in formulating Middle East policy. Is anyone providing an alternative viewpoint to eternal and uncritical support for Benjamin Netanyahu and his kleptocratic regime of racist thugs? I think not.

There are a couple of simple fixes for the dominant involvement of American Jews in foreign policy issues where they have a personal interest due to their ethnicity or family ties. First of all, don’t put them into national security positions involving the Middle East, where they will potentially be conflicted. Let them worry instead about North Korea, which does not have a Jewish minority and which was not involved in the holocaust. This type of solution was, in fact, somewhat of a policy regarding the U.S. Ambassador position in Israel. No Jew was appointed to avoid any conflict of interest prior to 1995, an understanding that was violated by Bill Clinton (wouldn’t you know it!) who named Martin Indyk to the post. Indyk was not even an American citizen at the time and had to be naturalized quickly prior to being approved by congress.

Those American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and somehow find themselves in senior policy making positions involving the Middle East and who actually possess any integrity on the issue should recuse themselves, just as any judge would do if he were presiding over a case in which he had a personal interest. Any American should be free to exercise first amendment rights to debate possible options regarding policy, up to and including embracing positions that damage the United States and benefit a foreign nation. But if he or she is in a position to actually create those policies, he or she should butt out and leave the policy generation to those who have no personal baggage.

For those American Jews who lack any shred of integrity, the media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.” That would be kind-of-like a warning label on a bottle of rat poison – translating roughly as “ingest even the tiniest little dosage of the nonsense spewed by Bill Kristol at your own peril.”

As none of the above is likely to happen, the only alternative is for American citizens who are tired of having their country’s national security interests hijacked by a group that is in thrall to a foreign government to become more assertive about what is happening. Shine a little light into the darkness and recognize who is being diddled and by whom. Call it like it is. And if someone’s feelings are hurt, too bad. We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver. Seriously, we don’t need it.


http://www.ipsnews.net/2004/03/iraq-war-launched-to-protect-israel-bush-adviser/
+++
I DO NOT endorse "End Times News Report"  (I don't know them and do not have the knowledge to endorse) but I know from YEARS of study, experience in real life and thousands of books read, and hundreds of thousands of "articles" there is not a single lie in this presentation.

+++
Below is the article just referenced:

Monday, October 9, 2017

IRAQ: War Launched to Protect Israel – Bush Adviser

By Emad Mekay Reprint |      | Print | Send by email

Emad Mekay

WASHINGTON, Mar 29 2004 (IPS) - Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the United States but it did to Israel, which is one reason why Washington invaded the Arab country, according to a speech made by a member of a top-level White House intelligence group.

IPS uncovered the remarks by Philip Zelikow, who is now the executive director of the body set up to investigate the terrorist attacks on the United States in September 2001 – the 9/11 commission – in which he suggests a prime motive for the invasion just over one year ago was to eliminate a threat to Israel, a staunch U.S. ally in the Middle East.
Zelikow’s casting of the attack on Iraq as one launched to protect Israel appears at odds with the public position of President George W. Bush and his administration, which has never overtly drawn the link between its war on the regime of former president Hussein and its concern for Israel’s security.
The administration has instead insisted it launched the war to liberate the Iraqi people, destroy Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to protect the United States.
Zelikow made his statements about "the unstated threat" during his tenure on a highly knowledgeable and well-connected body known as the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), which reports directly to the president.
He served on the board between 2001 and 2003.

"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I’ll tell you what I think the real threat (is) and actually has been since 1990 – it’s the threat against Israel," Zelikow told a crowd at the University of Virginia on Sep. 10, 2002, speaking on a panel of foreign policy experts assessing the impact of 9/11 and the future of the war on the al-Qaeda terrorist organisation.
"And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don’t care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn’t want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell," said Zelikow.
The statements are the first to surface from a source closely linked to the Bush administration acknowledging that the war, which has so far cost the lives of nearly 600 U.S. troops and thousands of Iraqis, was motivated by Washington’s desire to defend the Jewish state.
The administration, which is surrounded by staunch pro-Israel, neo-conservative hawks, is currently fighting an extensive campaign to ward off accusations that it derailed the "war on terrorism" it launched after 9/11 by taking a detour to Iraq, which appears to have posed no direct threat to the United States.
Israel is Washington’s biggest ally in the Middle East, receiving annual direct aid of three to four billion dollars.
Even though members of the 16-person PFIAB come from outside government, they enjoy the confidence of the president and have access to all information related to foreign intelligence that they need to play their vital advisory role.
Known in intelligence circles as "Piffy-ab", the board is supposed to evaluate the nation’s intelligence agencies and probe any mistakes they make.
The unpaid appointees on the board require a security clearance known as "code word" that is higher than top secret.
The national security adviser to former President George H.W. Bush (1989-93) Brent Scowcroft, currently chairs the board in its work overseeing a number of intelligence bodies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the various military intelligence groups and the Pentagon’s National Reconnaissance Office.
Neither Scowcroft nor Zelikow returned numerous phone calls and email messages from IPS for this story.
Zelikow has long-established ties to the Bush administration.
Before his appointment to PFIAB in October 2001, he was part of the current president’s transition team in January 2001.
In that capacity, Zelikow drafted a memo for National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice on reorganising and restructuring the National Security Council (NSC) and prioritising its work.
Richard A. Clarke, who was counter-terrorism coordinator for Bush’s predecessor President Bill Clinton (1993-2001) also worked for Bush senior, and has recently accused the current administration of not heeding his terrorism warnings, said Zelikow was among those he briefed about the urgent threat from al-Qaeda in December 2000.
Rice herself had served in the NSC during the first Bush administration, and subsequently teamed up with Zelikow on a 1995 book about the unification of Germany.
Zelikow had ties with another senior Bush administration official – Robert Zoellick, the current trade representative. The two wrote three books together, including one in 1998 on the United States and the "Muslim Middle East".
Aside from his position at the 9/11 commission, Zelikow is now also director of the Miller Centre of Public Affairs and White Burkett Miller Professor of History at the University of Virginia.
His close ties to the administration prompted accusations of a conflict of interest in 2002 from families of victims of the 9/11 attacks, who protested his appointment to the investigative body.
In his university speech, Zelikow, who strongly backed attacking the Iraqi dictator, also explained the threat to Israel by arguing that Baghdad was preparing in 1990-91 to spend huge amounts of "scarce hard currency" to harness "communications against electromagnetic pulse", a side-effect of a nuclear explosion that could sever radio, electronic and electrical communications.
That was "a perfectly absurd expenditure unless you were going to ride out a nuclear exchange – they (Iraqi officials) were not preparing to ride out a nuclear exchange with us. Those were preparations to ride out a nuclear exchange with the Israelis", according to Zelikow.
He also suggested that the danger of biological weapons falling into the hands of the anti-Israeli Islamic Resistance Movement, known by its Arabic acronym Hamas, would threaten Israel rather than the United States, and that those weapons could have been developed to the point where they could deter Washington from attacking Hamas.
"Play out those scenarios," he told his audience, "and I will tell you, people have thought about that, but they are just not talking very much about it".
"Don’t look at the links between Iraq and al-Qaeda, but then ask yourself the question, ‘gee, is Iraq tied to Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the people who are carrying out suicide bombings in Israel’? Easy question to answer; the evidence is abundant."
To date, the possibility of the United States attacking Iraq to protect Israel has been only timidly raised by some intellectuals and writers, with few public acknowledgements from sources close to the administration.
Analysts who reviewed Zelikow’s statements said they are concrete evidence of one factor in the rationale for going to war, which has been hushed up.
"Those of us speaking about it sort of routinely referred to the protection of Israel as a component," said Phyllis Bennis of the Washington-based Institute of Policy Studies. "But this is a very good piece of evidence of that."
Others say the administration should be blamed for not making known to the public its true intentions and real motives for invading Iraq.
"They (the administration) made a decision to invade Iraq, and then started to search for a policy to justify it. It was a decision in search of a policy and because of the odd way they went about it, people are trying to read something into it," said Nathan Brown, professor of political science at George Washington University and an expert on the Middle East.
But he downplayed the Israel link. "In terms of securing Israel, it doesn’t make sense to me because the Israelis are probably more concerned about Iran than they were about Iraq in terms of the long-term strategic threat," he said.
Still, Brown says Zelikow’s words carried weight.
"Certainly his position would allow him to speak with a little bit more expertise about the thinking of the Bush administration, but it doesn’t strike me that he is any more authoritative than Wolfowitz, or Rice or Powell or anybody else. All of them were sort of fishing about for justification for a decision that has already been made," Brown said. (END/2004)
Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

NOTE: I have been in sincere prayer for nearly three decades that the "conspirators" no matter who they are, would be exposed by their own hubris.  This is the case with  Valerie Plame Wilson who has capitulated and sacrificed her intellect, thrown it completely on the altar of Tribal Loyalty.  Who knows why she dared to publish TRUTH?

Now in context, since we understand that the "Globalist controlled MEDIA, will do anything, ANYTHING, to control the narrative, to be the thought manufacturers (all other thoughts VERBOTEN) what is the date of the Plame revelation and the Las Vegas Massacre.  I'll be honest I don't know. I was otherwise occupied with my daughter's life and death struggle with cancer.  But my GUT tells me that there is a correlation here.
 
http://www.ipsnews.net/2004/03/iraq-war-launched-to-protect-israel-bush-adviser/

____________________________________________
Written and compiled by-
ARCHPRIEST SYMEON ELIAS - The Orthodox Christian Philosopher.

Awake and Live, Sleep and Die: The choice has to be made

I've never even once listened to a Michael Savage show, but I have always been in agreement with what he claims as his core philosophy "God, Faith and Reason" and vis a vis our Nation, Borders, Language and Culture. I am presently being berated on the comment section of one of my videos by a Solipsist who claims to be a Pagan, but he is not a Pagan really, rather he is a Solipsist, since even a Pagan, has some belief system greater than himself, something extending from the outside world. He doesn't, the depth of his belief system is first path spirituality "because the way that I have imagined is the way that it is supposed to be." He holds his belief so fanatically that he is willing to beat me up and call me a hatemonger and bigot, call me "fanatical" even state that I should be put in prison for my WORDS, because I believe in God, hold The Faith once and for all delivered, and use reason, and understand that Borders, Language and Culture create a Nation, government cannot. All a government can create is a sphere of authority, however, if that authority does not elevate the culture that Nation is doomed. Sadly this little Solipsist, who believes his thoughts are all his own has been "Marxized" and unless I am willing to bow to the constraints of the Marxist Material Dialectic, I need to be imprisoned.

This same mindset is rampant in a huge portion of the American Population, but it does not reflect the majority by any stretch of the imagination. Though we are all tainted by the Marxist Material Dialectic, frightened to express the spiritual knowledge that is inherent in our faith, the Wisdom of the Holy Spirit, the WORD cutting past the facades and into the structure and core of things; Even though a great many are still embarrassed to speak from the GUT, to exercise and express the base of Godly wisdom they hold, (that still small voice guiding them, guarding them, informing them) more and more are willing to stand and simply say, "NO" when the lies arrive. The CIAmerican Psyops Apparatus, all evil tentacles of it will never make the American Population believe the Las Vegas Lone Gunman psyop, or that Sandy Hook was real, or that 911 was not an inside job. The awakening faith in God, ( imperfect, even broken as it is) I have witnessed in Americans, accompanies a sudden gut-level awareness that real the Culture (that exists in their hearts) and the artificial reality created by the CIA Mind WAR, are at odds and represent a true battle between Good and Evil, Knowledge and Ignorance, Life and Death. Keep awakening my friends, many slumber and perish.

America's Despicable Conduct in Syria

fort-russ.com

US Senator: "We Have Never Done Anything More Loathsome or Despicable Than What We're Doing in Syria."

31-39 minutes

---

By Ollie Richardson for Fort Russ
9th July, 2016

Senator Richard Black and Janice Kortkamp discuss the shameful situation in Syria, where the US government is actively arming and funding Al Nusra (Al Qaeda) and "conduits" ("moderates"), blending them together, and then using this model to exterminate the Syrian population. 

It should be noted that the mass media machine is seemingly losing its effect, as more and more prominent and senior figures (e.g Robert Fisk) are calling a spade a spade, or a "moderate" a terrorist. It just goes to show that you can fool some of the people all of the time, all of the people some of the time, but never all of the people all of the time.

Video Description (published 8th July 2016): "Virginia State Senator Richard Black and Janice Kortkamp Fearing recently returned from trips to Syria -- reporting on a reality far different than the lies the American people are being fed by the media. EIR's Jeffrey Steinberg interviews both on their meetings and experiences with top officials and everyday Syrians."

TRANSCRIPT OF PREVIOUS INTERVIEW WITH JEFFREY STEINBERG IN MAY 2016:

JEFFREY STEINBERG: Senator Black it’s a pleasure to be here. And you’ve just returned from a trip to the Middle East, to Syria and Lebanon, and why don’t you just start by telling us what you saw and your assessments of the situation there?

SEN. RICHARD BLACK: What we did, we spent the better part of a week; we spent our time in Lebanon initially; we met with General [michel] Aoun, who is sort of the presumptive next President of Lebanon. We met with Foreign Minister [gebran] Bassil who is the head of the Christian bloc of the parliament there. And also with the Syrian ambassador to Lebanon; which is a new thing. You know the Syrians have not had an ambassador there until just recently.

From there we flew to Damascus and were then taken out and we visited Palmyra, where the Syrian army conducted an enormously heroic fight to drive out ISIS and assisted by the Russians who did a very good job there. And then we drove from Palmyra to Homs. Homs is the largest province, it’s the size of an American state, but it’s also a very large city.

It was an incredible visit, because, like you, I have studied the Syrian war, the origins of the war for years, since 2011. I know you go back before that, but this is when I got so focused on it. And the best way to explain it, is that through intensive study and what we would call “open source intelligence,” you begin to get a very clear concept of what the war is all about, and the origins of the war. But when you go there and you actually walk the grounds and you shake hands with the soldiers and meet with the refugees and people like that, it turns black and white into Technicolor. And I’m going to tell you: Syria is one of the most incredibly wonderful nations on Earth. And the fact that America set out to topple the government and destroy it, long before there was the faintest hint of civil unrest, it’s really one of the great stains on American honor.

So when I went there, one the one thing that stands out so vividly is this incredible religious tapestry of religious harmony, between the Christians, the Alawites, the Sunnis, the Shi’ites, everyone; and there is such freedom of religion in Syria, and it’s stunning. You know, as an American, here we have the Federal courts being partially repressive to Christianity in particular, and you go over there and I went to the Syrian broadcast system SANA, did an interview. And I came out and in the press room here is the plywood cutout of the Christmas tree and the ornaments are journalists who were martyred covering the war. And you think, “My gosh, if you did this in the United States, the ACLU would be all over you! You’d be in Federal court, and they’d rip down the tree.”

And we went to the theater in Homs province, in Homs city; it’s a large, modern theater, probably seated a thousand people. And they introduced me and they were very polite and receptive. And I sat next to the governor and his wife, and they’re Muslim, and so I’m watching: Here’s this choral presentation, very beautiful, everyone in tuxedos and the orchestra and a very lovely woman, and naturally, the woman very charismatic, you’re focused on her; and then gradually your eyes start to shift gaze. And then, suddenly, I look and I realize that behind them is a theater screen with a projection of Jesus Christ, bloodied, crown of thorns, staggering under the weight of the cross. And I looked at it — and I didn’t even know what they were singing, because they were singing in Arabic, right? And I realized later that they were singing Christian religious songs. And I turned to the wife of the governor, and I said, “Is this a religious theater, a Christian theater?” She said, “No, no, no, this is just a regular theater for entertainment. We put on shows, we put on concerts, everything.” But it happened that on the Julian calendar, we were there for Palm Sunday and we left just prior to Easter.

And so, she said, many of the people here for the presentation are Muslim. She said, the choral group, many of them are Muslim also. And here, they’re participating in the praise of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ! Not that they are not serious Muslims, but it’s also indescribable without seeing it in person. I had heard about it, and from hundreds of Syrians, but to see it and just to encounter it at random, you suddenly were able to “breathe” religious freedom there!

STEINBERG: I think I told you, when I was in Damascus in March of 2010, some of the things that were completely stunning to me, were the Grand Mosque right off of this great market area. You walk in there; it’s a gigantic, beautiful mosque, and right in the middle of it is the tomb of John the Baptist.

BLACK: Yes.

STEINBERG: And we went to parts of the old city, and we visited one of the earliest, the very first of the Christian churches anywhere in the world, and it’s just really stunning. The first event that we went to, was an ecumenical conference. It was at a Sunni religious school; there were Shi’ite, Alawite, Sunni; there were Christians, there were Franciscan monks attending; people from Scandinavian churches. And that night there was a celebration in the old city, and they had these Sunni dervishes.

So it’s what you’re describing: If you’re not there and you don’t see it, it’s almost hard to concede that this is such a natural phenomenon in this country, and you see what the Saudis and the Turks and others are trying to establish, which this hard, sectarian fight within Islam , that has no bearing on the traditional culture of Syria as a country!

BLACK: Yes, and you know, I spoke with Lebanon very senior officials, and of course, discussed this with President Assad and with the top leadership of the Syrian parliament. And one of my questions, is why is there war in Syria? We know, this was not a popular uprising. This was a calculated decision by the CIA, MI6, French intelligence, working with the Muslim Brotherhood, Turks, Saudis — an organized plan to topple the government. And of course we were familiar that there competing plans for oil and gas pipelines. And I come up a divided mind on exactly what’s going on: It is true that the oil and gas pipelines are a major, major incentive for this war.

But the other thing, that both Lebanese and the Syrians were quite insistent on, is that it is Saudi Arabia’s desire to impose Wahhabism. They’re not content that the vast majority of Syrians are Sunni Muslims; now, if you listen to the press, they say, “oh, you know, we need a Sunni government.” Well, there are umpteen million Sunnis who are in the government and in high positions, and in the army and everywhere else. What they really mean is that we want Wahhabism, the type of Wahhabism that says that you impose severe, brutal Sharia law, and you begin beheading people, you force conversions and you take the wives of the Christians that you’ve murdered and you sell them at slave markets, which is happening right now in Iraq, perhaps in some parts of Syria also; but their feeling is that the true zeal behind this is this desire to impose the harshest, most extreme and violent, brutal form of Islamic rule.

STEINBERG: What you’re describing is the ISIS and the al-Nusra Front which is simply al-Qaeda, and the Saudis carry out beheadings, cutting off limbs, as their brand of Sharia law justice, exactly as ISIS and Nusra do in the areas they control.

BLACK: That’s exactly correct. And this has gone on through history. When I visited the Church of the Patriarch of Syria and the East, we went to a little adjacent, Christian school, and they had paintings of martyrs, and just as a reminder, that the history of Turkey, the Turks and the Saudis share the same history of violence towards those who do not share this most extreme view. And there was a painting that just stood out in my mind of a martyr, a woman during the Armenian genocide, a Christian, and the extremists had come in and they had amputated her feet and her hands. And she had an infant, and she cradled the infant and breast-fed the infant for the next couple days until she finally died of the torture they’d imposed on her.

So you know, they had suppressed this in Turkey under Ataturk, starting 1925. I read the Turkish Constitution; it’s admirable, it’s a very fine Constitution. But now you have President Erdogan who has said…

STEINBERG: He’s ripping it up.

BLACK: He’s tearing it to shreds, and he says “I want the powers of Adolf Hitler.”

STEINBERG: That’s right.

BLACK: Our ally. Our ally says, “I want the powers of Adolf Hitler!” Imagine that!

STEINBERG: Mm-hmm. And it was brushed off and explained away in the American media as a misquote or something like that, as if he hadn’t said it, and didn’t mean it.

BLACK: And he never retracted a word of it! But a spokesman said, “well, you know, it’s sort of out of context.” Well — gimme a break. How do you put “the powers of Adolf Hitler” out of context! You know?

STEINBERG: Right, exactly.

I wanted to ask you, because I think you made a very important point about the Saudis and what they want, the Turks and what they want, but if the United States and Western European were not in on this for their own reasons, from the very outset, I doubt that the Saudis or the Turks would have been able to create the mess. And I’m reminded that way back in 1991, right at the point that the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union were disintegrating, according to Gen. Wesley Clark, he met with Paul Wolfowitz in Dick Cheney’s office — Cheney was Secretary of Defense under Bush Sr.—and Wolfowitz went through a list of governments targeted for regime change because they had at various points, allied with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. And Syria was right near the top of that list; Syria, Iraq, Libya, others.

And so, I wanted to get your assessment, given the way the situation has played out, the tragedy of the last five years, do you think that this could have actually occurred were it not for the full, witting complicity of the United States, both under President George W. Bush and now, for the last seven years, under President Barack Obama?

BLACK: That’s an excellent question. If one of our assistants could hand me the black and white poster over there, I think this could help to explain it somewhat. [Placard reading "Syrian War Countdown" 16:10]

Let me just run you through this, because the timeline is extremely important: In 2001, Gen. Wesley Clark, former Supreme Allied Commander Europe has told us, that the Pentagon was ordered by the Secretary of Defense to make plans to topple seven different countries, neutral, non-belligerent countries, in what was an act of aggression under the law of war, which is a war crime. And so, the Pentagon began war-planning 2001.

Now, President Bashar al-Assad did not take office until I think it was 2000; so he was brand new. He’d come in as a reformer. But reform, good or bad, didn’t matter; we were going to topple seven countries, all of them also enemies of the Saudi Arabians. The United States is pulled around by the nose by Saudi Arabia, and for our senior leaders in this country, they all have a meeting with Mr. Green. And Mr. Green persuades them to do whatever the Saudis tell them.

So, OK, you start with 2001, the Pentagon starts planning. In 2006, WikiLeaks has released a document that came from the Chargé d’affaires at the U.S. Embassy; at the time, we didn’t not have an ambassador, so the Chargé d’affaires was the senior person. That document outlined, in detail, plans to overthrow the government of Syria. And the two things that stand out in my mind is, we have a problem because President Assad came in as a reformer, he’s doing a lot of positive things, and so it is drawing an enormous amount of foreign direct investment and we’ve got to smear the image of Syria so that it will begin cutting off this flow of funds, and will adversely impact the Syrian economy. This is the United States, your country and my country, saying “we’re going to destroy another country by smearing their reputation.

The other thing which I think was equally sinister, is in this country that has this beautiful religious harmony, we said have got to create religious division, religious frictions and hatred among religions, so that we can disassemble this country.

But there were six very specific things outlined. And keep in mind, in 2006, there were no demonstrations, there was no political opposition, there were no uprisings, people were prosperous, they were happy.

So here you go from 2005, we start planning the war; 2006, we come up with explicit plans. You go to 2011 and the CIA works to gain the release of the most deadly al-Qaeda operatives in Libyan prisons and uses those people to spark an uprising in Benghazi, the purpose of which — and I wish, you know, Congress, while they’re always talking about Benghazi, they never talk about before Benghazi. What was the reason we were there in the first place! Why did we attack our

ally, Colonel Qaddafi — now we have had problems with Qaddafi but we had resolved them …

STEINBERG: In 2003, he dismantled his WMD program and became — even John McCain, Joe Lieberman, and Lindsey Graham, in early 2009, were in Tripoli and said “this guy’s our best friend in our war against — ” it wasn’t ISIS yet, but “the war against al-Qaeda and the other jihadists.”

BLACK: Yes, yes. So, absolutely, he was our best ally. And however, his big mistake was he had a huge arsenal of modern weapons, that we needed, to overthrow Syria. The reason that we went into Libya was, to capture their weapons to feed and fuel the war against Syria. Because we knew, Syria was a powerfully united, cohesive nation of people who — you know, every country has people who are unhappy or who are dissidents; we have ‘em in this country — but we knew that we had a tough nut to crack here, because this was a very cohesive country. So we needed a huge amount of armaments. The reason we went into Libya was to capture these. And this is all laid out by Pulitzer Prize winning author Seymour Hersh in his article, “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” something that was censored; almost everything he’s done has been widely printed by major media, and they censored it. But the London Review of Books has it published, and he explains why we went in, how we captured the weapons, and how we started the rat line, flying arms in.

Because the CIA could not go before Congress and say, “Look, we intend to attack a neutral, non-belligerent country, where the people are happy, prosperous, and enjoy greater women’s rights and religious freedom than any other Arab nation; we’re going to rip it to shreds, we’re going to open up a torrent of bloodshed: Please give us an appropriation so we can purchase weapons to do it.”

STEINBERG: Right.

BLACK: That would not have gone over well. So, we went around it, and we captured the weapons in Libya, sent ‘em to Syria. Three months after the war in Libya, even before Colonel Qaddafi had fallen, we started the war in Syria. And the technique that we used, — now just watch the timeline: We go from 2001, we decided to bring ‘em down then, it was 10 years! An entire decade of planning and plotting and preparing.

STEINBERG: Exactly, exactly.

BLACK: So, you look at this timeline, and then, of course, we’ve employed massive, unrelenting propaganda against President Assad and his government. We call him a “regime,” the “Assad regime.”

STEINBERG: Right, as opposed to “an elected, sovereign government.”

BLACK: Yes. Now, of course, we always ignore the fact that he was popularly elected, in fair and open elections in 2014. Now, on the other hand, we sit at Geneva III at the peace talks, and on one side we have Saudi Arabia, where if you were to suggest the election of the King or dictator of Saudi Arabia, your head would be a spike the next day; and then, on the other hand, you have President Erdogan, the man who would be Adolf Hitler! [laughter]

STEINBERG: Right!

BLACK: It is so bizarre. And the method that we use, the specific method when we triggered this is interesting. The Arab Spring started with a single suicide, and it is very difficult to conceive that it did not spread without very active covert action. Nothing ever happens in politics, nothing just happens without a push.

So there actually began to be legitimate demonstrations in Syria as well as across the Middle East. What I found interesting, I talked to several people — I just bumped into them on my trip, and they said, “Oh, I was anti-Assad then.” Well, one of them turns out to be my interpreter; he’d been with me for the better part of a week! And one day we’re talking, and he said, “You know,” he said, “I was a demonstrator against President Assad.” And I said, “Oh, that’s interesting. Tell me about it?”

He said, “Well, we just started. It was during the Arab Spring, and we started holding demonstrations.” Much like, you and I have both probably been involved in demonstrations! But he said, “first, people started showing up with al-Qaeda flags.”

STEINBERG: Yeah. The black flags.

BLACK: “Then,” he said, “people started showing up with military weapons.” Now, there is no Second Amendment in Syria, so you don’t just grab a Kalashnikov at the corner drug store.

STEINBERG: Right. You don’t go to a gun show on Sunday afternoon.

BLACK: That’s right, you don’t do that. And he said, “The third thing, is they began to preach religious hatred!” And all along the demonstrators would say, “You guys, get out of here, get out of here! This is not what we’re about. We’re just here asking the government for some changes.” And the friction became tougher and tougher, and he said, “My uncle was the head of all the demonstrators” in this large city, and he said, in the seventh month of back and forth with the al-Qaeda people, they murdered him; they killed him.

And so I asked the same question of the several people I encountered, who had been anti-Assad. Well, they weren’t anti-Assad, they were demonstrators; they weren’t demonstrating against him.

STEINBERG: Sure. They wanted reforms.

BLACK: They wanted reforms. You know, I’ve been in demonstrations; I wasn’t demonstrating to bring down the government, I was there for reform.

And this was news to me, because I knew about this transition, but what was stunning that consistently, — two out of the three said that this transition took place over the span of a single month; the second one said it took place over the span of two months. So within one to two months, what started as demonstrations became an al-Qaeda-led violent, jihadist uprising. And of course, you still had demonstrators struggling to make it a demonstration. But that was how it developed.

STEINBERG: You know, it coincided with the period in 2010 going into 2011, when back here in Washington, there was a study ordered by President Obama, of how to relate to the anticipated insurgencies that were going to sweep across the Muslim world, particularly North Africa and the Middle East. The conclusion that was arrived at by people like Dennis Ross, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, was that the horse the United States should ride in on was the Muslim Brotherhood.

BLACK: Yeah.

STEINBERG: And these are still classified, National Security Study and Decision Directives, that are the cornerstone of the U.S. strategy, which was to basically play into the jihadist insurgencies.

BLACK: Yes, and you know, that brings us to a good point: You then come to the point of the uprising itself, how was this carried out? Just prior to the uprisings, Ambassador Ford was sent to Damascus; we had not had an ambassador there for some time. He was put in place by Hillary Clinton. Around that time, of course, you have all of these covert agencies; Western agencies, plus the Saudis and the Turks. And their mechanism was the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood had created a violent uprising under the father, Hafez Assad, and it’s often portrayed some put-down of these poor people. It was not at all that: It was a violent uprising by the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Brotherhood copied, almost with precision, the approach that the Nazis took during Kristallnacht, which triggered the anti-Jewish backlash by the Nazi Party. The Nazis during Kristallnacht and they painted the Jewish star on all Jewish buildings and residences, and then on signal they surged through and they smashed and they beat, they killed 92 people. With identical procedures, the Muslim Brotherhood, first they hired people to stand on the street corners with placards that said, “Christians to Beirut, Alawites to the grave.” Which meant, we’re going to kick out 10% of our population, another 10% we’re going to murder them. In short order, it changed to “Christians to the grave, Alawites to the grave,” which meant, we’re going to kill 1 out of every 5 Syrians.

So they had these people carrying these placards, and then, at a certain point, the Muslim Brotherhood sent people out at night; they marked the residences, and the businesses, with the Nazarene symbol; and then right after mosque, with the most extremist mosques, they surged out and began beating and roughing up and murdering Christians. Within three days from the city of Hama, 70,000 Christians streamed into Damascus; why Damascus? Because they knew that President Assad would protect the Christians. He would protect anyone who was under attack by the Muslim Brotherhood.

And interestingly, then, Ambassador Ford and the French ambassador, get in a car; and the city of Hama had been ringed with security forces so that they could restore order to the town. And violating diplomatic protocol, they bypassed security, they met with the demonstrators, and they promised total American support. And by that action, they converted demonstrations into an armed revolution. And this was done intentionally.

STEINBERG: Right. I was at an event in Washington, in June of 2011, and there was still a Syrian ambassador in Washington at the time. It was Dr. Imad Mustafa. And this was really even before the major eruptions of violence that came a bit later in the year. And he presented a series of videos of sermons that were given by these Wahhabi and other radicalized clerics in these small, rural areas; and it was an absolute call to arms! And this was early on in the process. He said, “this is what we’re dealing with. This is a problem that has existed for a long time, but now, suddenly this problem has mushroomed tremendously, because there’s all of this outside support and encouragement coming from Washington and coming from all of these other places.”

This is what has been described as “regime change.” Using quote “civil society,” as a kind of a human shield, for organized, well-armed, violent elements, that make the claim that they’re part of a public outcry, upsurge; but in fact, it’s an organized, financed, and armed operation.

You mentioned the Sy Hersh article: the United Nations as part of the enforcement of the arms embargo had been monitoring all of those weapons going from Libya into Syria, into the hands of the jihadists. And there were a series of UN reports that tracked out, from Benghazi ships and planes from Qatar and from Turkey, that were overseen by American and British officials on the ground, loading the weapons up; and this is all in official United Nations reports, indicating exactly what you described: the flow of weapons through these channels into the rebels in Syria. Yet, you won’t read a word about that in the American and European media, which is completely on board with this regime change strategy.

BLACK: Well, you know, I’ll tell you what is amazing, Jeff, is that when we started the war on terror, after 9/11, it was essentially a war against al-Qaeda and similar organizations. We have gone full circle from opposing al-Qaeda, which sent 3,000 Americans to a flaming death on 9/11, complete circle to where we now supply them; we arm them; we finance them; and it’s all coming with the approval of the highest authorities in the United States government.

And you know, if you want to consider whether the people of Syria are for or against their government and their President, just consider this: Syria has a population of 23 million people. It is in the sixth year of a war in which it has been opposed by the United States, Great Britain, France, NATO, the European Union, …

STEINBERG: Right. The GCC.

BLACK: Saudi Arabia, Turkey, the GCC — this massive force! I mean, basically, all of the great nations of the world, — almost all, not China and Russia, of course — but almost all of the great nations have descended on little Syria, and it’s like “The Little Train That Could,” they just keep chuggin’ and chuggin’ and chuggin’.

And I spoke with the First Lady, who is just utterly charming. She is not — unlike the First Ladies we’re accustomed to who are ostentatious, and pompous and arrogant — she is very down to earth, a very nice person; and she said, “One of the things I’ve done,” she said, unlike worrying about hamburgers and billboards and things like that, she goes out and she meets the families that have lost sons in battle, and she says, “I’ve now met with over 1,000 personally.” She said, “when I first did it, I was naturally apprehensive, and I knew that I would go to some homes and the people would be just so distraught that they’d burst out in anger at anybody who came, and was like me.” But she said, “I was so surprised. I had never encountered that. Every home I go to, they tell me, we are so deeply sad for the loss of our son, but we cannot think of anything for which we would rather have sacrificed our son than for the defense of Syria, for the unity of this nation.”

And I saw that over and over: I went to a hospital for amputees, and I discovered, — just to my personal disgrace as an American — that the sanctions we have imposed on Syria prevent them from receiving prosthetic devices, amputees. They said, not long ago, they had 600 cancer patients, and they said, “look can you make an exception to the exchange provisions,” where we’d blocked all foreign exchange, “so we can get medication for these cancer patients?” And the Treasury Department said, “No. You don’t get prosthetic devices for people who are missing legs and arms; you don’t medication for cancer patients…” There’s such utter cruelty in our government! I mean — our Federal government!

When I was a young Marine, we used to — at the end of the day we’d stand there, the drill instructor would march back and forth, and we’d scream the Marine Corps hymn, and we’d say the words, “we will fight for right and freedom and to keep our honor clean, we’re proud to claim the title of United States Marine.” If ever our honor has been disgraced, here we are cutting off access to prosthetic limbs for people! Where have we come?! What has come of this country?!

STEINBERG: Exactly. And these are really violations of the Geneva Conventions. There are rules of war, and rules for the kind of medical care that all parties deserve in wartime. And it’s violated.

I wanted to ask you before we finish up: Within the bounds of what you’re comfortable discussing, your impressions and things that came from both your discussion with President Assad and maybe some of the other officials; and similarly, when you were Lebanon, I’m wondering what General Aoun might of shared with you, in terms of his view of what has happened in the region; because is one of the countries that has been greatly affected, and badly, badly damaged by this phenomenon. The Saudis have basically vetoed a President being selected by the parliament because they don’t want anything that would stand in the way of their — as you say — their drive to spread Wahhabism everywhere.

BLACK: Yes. Well, you know, Lebanon has a unique structure, where the President is always a Christian, the Prime Minister is always Sunni, and the Speaker of the Parliament is Shi’a. It’s their way. They don’t quite achieve religious harmony quite as smoothly as Syria does. But interestingly, General Aoun spent a good part of his life fighting against Syria, because Syria occupied a portion of Lebanon; and Syria withdrew under President Assad. When he took over he began the withdrawal and completed the withdrawal of Syrian troops. General Aoun always took the position, he said, “when you’re in my country you are my enemy,” he said, “when you’re out, you are my friend.” And he has been true to that. He’s a delightful man.

And he clearly is supportive of the government of Syria, and I think is very respectful of the President of Syria. And I think he realizes something that I was quoted by ISIS as saying. You know, there were three Americans chosen as enemies as ISIS, but they quoted me, in a way that said, “this man is telling the truth, and listen,” because they said, “in the words of the enemy.” They called me the “American Crusader” — “in the words of the enemy,” and they quoted me accurately and I had said something to the effect that, if Assad falls, then the dread black and white flag of al-Qaeda will fly over Damascus; and within months, Lebanon will fall, and Jordan will fall. And with the consolidation of this very large area under the control of al-Qaeda, we will then face this tremendous extremism that will percolate over into Turkey where it already is taking hold, very rapidly. And that that will begin a drive on Europe, and I believe that this time, Europe will fall.”

And I think that from General Aoun’s perspective, from President Assad’s perspective, from the various officials that I spoke with, I think they share this belief; I think they believe that this is the objective of al-Qaeda.

And you know, the Joint Chiefs of Staff became so distraught, so very concerned about the eventual outcome of events in Syria, that they tasked the Defense Intelligence Agency in the summer of 2013 to do complete study and to render findings of fact. The Defense Intelligence Agency, which is not political like the CIA, came up with three findings: They said 1) President Assad must not leave office because if he does, Syria will fall into chaos, just as Libya has done. 2) Turkey is a major problem, because they are the supplier of ISIS, they give them arms, ammunition, everything that ISIS gets comes out of Turkey. And 3) which is the very thing that President Assad has said from the beginning, they said, there are no moderate rebels. The notion is a fantasy, they do not exist! And yet, I think yesterday, Secretary Kerry was out there saying, we’ve got to help the moderate rebels. The “moderate rebels” are al-Qaeda, who flew the jets into the Twin Towers and today these are the “moderates”!

So this is where we have come….

STEINBERG: Right, right. And “Saudi Arabia is our greatest ally in the region.”

BLACK: Yeah. Saudi Arabia, there is increasing evidence pointing to Saudi Arabia as the prime actor in the attacks on 9/11; more and more people are beginning to conclude that as evidence starts emerging.

And so here we are: We are allied with the country most complicit in the 9/11 attacks on us, and we have gone full circle and we are now supplying al-Qaeda with TOW antitank missiles and we’re preparing to give them even more advanced weapons such as antiaircraft missiles; they can be used to shoot down Boeing 747 jets at Dulles Airport, and Heathrow and LaGuardia and across the world.

Extremely reckless, nearly an insane American policy, driven by Saudi wealth that lines the pockets of top people in this country. It’s sad.

STEINBERG: I want to thank you very much. This was really an important visit that you made, a courageous visit. And I think sharing these insights and getting them out as widely as possible is one of the critical steps in getting the United States back on its traditional track which we have veered off of so dangerously that we might not make it as a nation, if we don’t make the corrections in time.

BLACK: We are on a suicidal course, and I really appreciate you, helping to get the word out. We’ve got to change course, or it’s coming here, and it’s coming fast.

STEINBERG: That’s right. Thank you again.

BLACK: Thank you very much.

The Las Vegas Massacre Motive and Target

+++

+++
Transcript:

It is rare that you will find me quoting Alex Jones, but he said something so very succinct about the Las Vegas Massacre it needs to be burned into the psyche of every Patriot. He said, "The motive was the target; The target was the motive." This is very important to understand.

Who were the victims of the Las Vegas Attack?

People most likely to be America First Nationalists; after all the event was White Culture celebrating White Southern Culture, which is Country Music. Few places gather more Traditionally minded Americans than does a Country Music festival and the Deep State has named White and especially Southern White Culture as the "enemy" in a classic Marxist conflict theory operation, isolating White Culture, Demonizing White Culture, calling it Neo-NAZI, Racist, Fascists and White Supremacist, tearing down monuments to not just Confederate dignitaries but ANY white founder. Remember the video I made with the Marxist Frank Schaeffer raving about the SHAME of having a monument to Thomas Jefferson on the Capital Mall? I'm sure a rainbow colored phallic monument to Gay Pride would be just fine for him, or a monument to Che Guevara the mass murdering Marxist/Hispanic Revolutionary. No, he would be perfectly comfortable with both. 
 
With the wild speculations happening about the Las Vegas shooting, we must NOT allow the Fake Media and the Deep State apparatchiks to confuse our view of the nature of the WAR we are facing. The object of this attack is to COW Trump Supporters AND create civil war chaos, to make the society ungovernable requiring the Deep State to take control, when the visible government fails.

There is an operation here larger than some petty millions for security machines and extra security in Vegas, a conspiracy story being floated where a couple of Deep State Billionaires stand to make tens of millions of dollars on the "rush to make Las Vegas Secure." The Vegas Massacre is larger than some FBI/ISIS gun deal gone wrong another conspiracy theory being floated. The people writing this stuff are thinking in very narrow boxes when this is a very broad struggle in which the fate of all of Western Civilization rests. So NO this is not about security companies making a fortune in Vegas, nor is it about some gun running by the FBI to ISIS, nor is it about a hundred other theories, IT IS ABOUT the Deep State trying to create civil war chaos AND at the same time COW Trump Supporters. It is designed to make every America First Patriot fear gathering at a Trump Rally; it is designed to make every Trump supporter fear being a Trump supporter. But since we (We Truth and Liberty Patriots) will not Stand Down . . . well you see . . . We cannot make peace with this evil and survive it, it has to be conquered. There is no kumbyah magic at this point; we stand we fight first with civil tools then by any means possible if necessary or we die. These people are serious, they are Marxists/Globalists our lives mean nothing to them. These Marxists intend to kill us. That is not paranoia speaking rather the witness of history and taking them at their word.

My friend, Rex Christi, the radio host of Liberty's Thunder Blog Talk Radio said something that is very prescient to this subject, how the psyops works "When they've already captured your mind; suppression of facts becomes unnecessary. This works for those who buy the official story and also for those who don't. The psychological effect is the same; the result is CONTROL. Find a higher point on which to triangulate, or bounce around inside the dialectic."  We are giving the same caution in different words. This is not about the intricacies of the Vegas Ambush, isolated like the JFK assassination where it stung and changed history. We cannot allow it to be that. It is not and cannot be our focus, just as Bunker Hill or Valley Forge was not the focus of the American Revolution. The time for anatomizing the battles, laying them on the dissection table for the historians to debate is AFTER THE WAR IS WON.  
We must not allow the Marxist thought manufacturers and mind manipulators who planned and executed the Las Vegas massacre, which is an attack upon all and especially the average Americans who they view as the enemy . . . we must not allow them to control the dialectic, to misdirect our attention. For instance, this is not about Gun Control, even though they need the confiscation of weapons to conquer us, and we are NEVER going down that path. Were they to try gun confiscation it would be a blood bath. No this is not about a narrow goal, a petty motive, a thieving scheme, an FBI/ISIS shootout. This was a politically motivated Marxist attack upon our nation on the 100th anniversary of their conquest of Russia. We MUST stand and say, and mean it to our very CORE that no Marxist terror will cow us to accept their Luciferian Globalist conquest of America and the world. We are Americans and we will have our country back, our Christian Culture back, our Republic back. And we must say to the Marxists, you gamble your survival in this life by these continual violent attacks. You cannot Stand and WE have no other sane choice. You have left us no other choice, because Marxist slavery and death is not an option. 
 
We will not accept the fantasy that this attack was the work of a crazed lone gunman when the Marxist Media, politicians and other Marxist apparatchiks have been on a years long campaign to create a race war and an eleven month call for armed insurrection and revolution against our legally elected president calling for his death and the death of his supporters. Vegas was nothing short of a war crime by the Shadow Government against the American People. We put them on notice they will not survive much less win.

Sadly, this being War, just as there is no time for anatomizing and dissecting the event, there is not time for sentimental grieving and emotional memorializing, like the locked the culture into 15 years of sentimental hypnosis over 9/11 and misdirected our anger.  We can grieve later and we dare not allow them to play our heart strings. NOW WE FIGHT.

Folks, if you are not ready for the battle, there is little time to suit up, but suiting up you must.  At no time in our history and no time in your life have these words been more necessary. Beloved be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might.
Eph 6:11  Put on the full armor of God, so that you may be able to stand against the stratagems of the devil.

Do you hear what Saint Paul was saying? Don't give me this, "Oh Butch, you talk about conspiracy theories. No one is plotting against us." IDIOT CHRISTIANS make that ridiculous statement to me. They are Marxist/Masons and too stupid to know it. Lucifer and those dedicated to his name, the Marxist, the Muslims they have stratagems, and an ultimate agenda to rule you or kill you. This is not fantasy folks!  Yet . . .

Eph 6:12  For we wrestle not against flesh and blood,
In truth the Vegas gunman, whether a patsy or evil actor AND the people who financed and planned his operation, their operation, they are no enemy to us, but the spiritual power that deludes them most certainly is.  Because you see . . we wrestle not against flesh and blood . .

but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual forces of evil in the heavenlies.

These are forces that can warp your emotions, hypnotize you, deceive you, this is the MIND WAR. (All WAR IS DECEPTION).
Eph 6:13  Because of this, take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having accomplished all things, to stand.
Eph 6:14  Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness,
Eph 6:15  and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace;
Eph 6:16  above all, taking up the shield of faith, with which you will be able to quench all the flaming arrows of the evil one.
Eph 6:17  And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God;
Eph 6:18  through every prayer and petition, praying in every season in the Spirit, being watchful to this same thing with all perseverance and petition concerning all the saints--
Eph 6:19  and for me, that utterance may be given to me in the opening of my mouth, to make known with boldness the mystery of the gospel,
Eph 6:20  for the sake of which I serve as an ambassador in chains; that in it I may speak boldly, as I must speak.

We ARE in chains folks, our country has been Marxized, the culture turned into a evil weapon of destruction of Mind and Body, are children are imprisoned in a brainwashing apparatus called American Marxist Education, our businesses have become Vampir-ic, sucking our life's work, offering us material/consumer slavery. The leftist Christopher Hedges nailed it on the head when he said, "We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy the economy.” Please accept as observably true in this inverted culture where good is contemned and evil celebrated that Christopher's statement is just the tip of the iceberg of inside outside lying Marxist deception that is the REALTY in with we are given to live. These are chains folks, and we have to be ambassadors of SANITY making bold with the mystery of the Gospel that can produce SANITY, that can produce healing/Salvation. 

Our mothers and fathers, sisters and bothers, children and friends, all of us were bleeding morally, spiritually, psychically, given little to eat, little to see, little to hear, little to enjoy that is not tainted with Marxist Materialism, God denying and Death Engendering.  This is the WAR, and most of us are untrained for the WAR, unarmed for the WAR, unprepared for the WAR, unformed for the WAR and it is a we cannot avoid.

You fight or you die, my friend Rex Christi hammers that thought every week, but let me put some new perspective on that thought, You fight in ignorance you WILL die or be enslaved. You fight spiritually unarmed you are DEAD ALREADY.  Suit up my friends, Suit up. Remedial Training in the midst of the battle is all that is not available.  Suit up my friends, Suit up or die.

I'm going to end with
A Prayer to Break Free of the Cultural of Death.
Come to our aid, Oh Lord
Make haste to help us!
Your Children are asleep
and suffer destruction.
We are disarmed in this battle
we cannot rightly name our enemy.
We are taught that evil does not exist
that there is no cunning intelligence, seeking to destroy all of mankind.
Yet
here we are in the age of Genocide!
When the stated goal of the most powerful empire history has ever produced, is a population reduction in the 21st Century of 90 percent of the world's population!
That means erasing seven billion people from this planet, in the next 85 years.
Is this the future you want for your children, Lord?
Is this suffering we are required to suffer?
Would that the premise of this prayer were the rantings of an insane man, and not the Real, World, Reality, and the publicly stated plans, of the International Globalists, who have taken control of Western Civilization.
Julian Huxley, the first head of UNESCO, outlined the plan of Genocide we see unfolding all across the Globe, with the help of Non-governmental organizations and the IMF, the World Bank and American AID.
Poor, African nations, are told that to gain protection from Islamic Jihadis, they have to accept the gay agenda, abortion, and other means of soft genocide.
The Powerful empire of Chaos has created wars, destroyed peaceful countries, created false, that is artificial famines, artificial droughts, and engaged in weather and earthquake terrorism.
They have erased 250 Million people in the last 120 years, with their world revolutionary movement.
Following the cold war, they have redoubled their genocide and paid for, and accomplished fifteen hundred million abortions. That is one and a half Billion abortions, just from 1990 to 2012.
Lord, the increase of Christian persecution is obvious, and even our own Luciferian State Department and the U.N. officially recognize the Christian genocide under ISIS, in Iraq and Syria.
Lord, would that these facts were not true, but they are true.
The horror of it, is beyond the mental and emotional capacity of most people to grasp, to retain, so damaged are their souls by the Mind, War.
They remain hypnotized by the pop culture and news media propaganda.
Lord, they rave, and write billions of words every day, on social media, expressing their dissatisfaction, pointing their finger at each other, while the true enemy remains hidden in plain sight.
They cannot name him, nor can they recognize his henchmen in powerful positions.
Instead, they sacrifice their time and talents, playing a fake political game, supporting politicians, who are Malthusian monsters, like they are rock stars.
And they are idols.
Idols, they look to, for salvation.
Nothing they can opine or conjecture about the sociological problems of their own families, their own communities can have any real world meaning until they face the genocidal nature of the enemy, and all the ways those dark forces use, to get them to destroy themselves, to actually participate in their own soft-genocide.
Lord, a famous social commentator, Christopher Hedges said, a generation ago.
We now live in a nation where Doctors destroy health
lawyers destroy justice
universities destroy knowledge
government destroys freedom
religion destroys morals, and, our banks destroy the economy.
In a generation, Lord, we have discovered that Mr. Hedges' dark assessment, actually did not come close to telling the truth of the story.
Now having discovered the over-arching agenda of the international Globalists
we know that needless wars are created for the purpose of genocide.
economics is being used as a tool of genocide.
the new morality of the new religion, of the New World Order, is all seen as a tool of soft genocide
modern health care in America has become a tool of Eugenics, a means of soft genocide.
It may feel soft, to the young adult in good health, but it is not soft, for the infant or senior denied critical care and allowed to die.
Some schemes of modern medicine, are clearly for genocidal purposes, like the massive amount of poisons a poor infant born into this country has to endure.
At this point in time, Lord, the mental health professions have been exposed to us as tools of the Marxist, Mind War,
designed to keep people calm, while the genocide continues, and to label, any one who resist and opposes the agenda, as, mentally ill.
Lord, they have better than one in four adults on psychotropic, mind altering drugs.
And almost one in five minors on the same mind-altering poisons.
A great portion of modern science has become demonic-scientism.
It has turned anti-human and is being used as an instrument of control and genocide, claiming they are producing an "evolutionary step" when in fact they are preparing a suicidal step, yet more genocide.
Lord, why are so many so blind?
The genocide is so well documented, it takes one who is nascent, or purposely ignorant not to see it.
And the propaganda apparatchiks are very willing to keep the innocent nascent and the ignorant entertained and distracted like cats ever chasing elusive mice in a political maze. Never catching the prize. Or catching it, only to discover it is a puppet and not real.
At this point, they are without excuse. Not only are they disarmed, they are deluded.
Lord, the propaganda apparatus is a powerful demonic influence, and many cooperate with it, totally unaware they are being controlled by the father of all lies.
The lying propagandists are the agents of the genocidal monsters among us!
Lord, we cannot accept this agenda of genocide and hold respect for you, and respect for the dignity of the human person who is created in your own image.
Father, we know that the paleo-Hebrew symbol for Satan was a set of jaws with big teeth. Satan was understood even in ancient times, as the one, who chews up humanity.
And we know that Jesus confirmed this, saying that Satan roamed the earth like a hungry lion, seeking whom he might devour.
In this age of Global Genocide, with evil men pressing even for nuclear conflagration with Russia, we know that Jesus was not speaking metaphorically.
We are witnessing the great harvest
There were More Christian martyrs in the last century, more than all the previous centuries of church history, Combined.
We witnessed great tribal wars in Africa, three world wars in the 20th century if you count the Cold war with all its proxy wars.
Now we experience world war four, with its proxy wars, rampant jihadism and terrorism, and accompanying genocides.
Plus, the billions of infants offered on the pagan altar to Moloch, by abortion and infanticide.
We used to know, Lord, and had the sense to ask a woman,
are you with child?
understanding that the life within her was a human child, a person.
Now, she is just pregnant, a word the Cultural Marxist medical establishment adopted to wipe away the personhood of the child in her womb.
We ask, how pregnant are you? 6 weeks? 6 months? As if being with child is a condition like cancer
stage 3
stage 4?
In the midst of the great harvest, most who were waiting to see it, are absolutely blind to it.
Lord, Jesus, open our eyes
teach us to arm ourselves to defeat this evil, that is devouring mankind.
teach us to recognize the insanity of Trans-humanism.
What vision of mankind could exhibit more insanity than a man trying to migrate his soul into some hybrid, humanoid, cyborg, monstrosity, mocking your image, while he slaughters billions of his own kind!
I know, it is ridiculous, even comical in a truly sick way. But, here we are.
Is this insanity less insane than was Hitler's slaughter of millions to produce his master race?
It is, on the face of it, much, more, insane, but we talk about it in our society as if it is an academic discussion, when millions, no, actually, Billions suffer.
Of course, it is more insane! The master race we are trying to create is a cyborg, a demonic mockery of the human person.
This devouring evil is so intelligent and cunning, it has us denying it even exists!
Come to our aid, Oh Lord!
We are weak, foolish, arrogant and blind.
We have turned a blind eye to this slaughter, filled our bellies, and allowed Satan to lull us into a sleep of death, using entertainment
political games
pornography
illusions and delusions of the gay agenda, the mythology of the singularity, and trans-humanism.
We have expended our passions on video games, sports, lotteries, parties, drugs, fake Christianity, arrogant ego-driven spirituality, in Mega Churches, using the tools of mass hypnosis to keep us blind and temporarily satisfied.
Teach us how to take hold of the True Christian Faith, that engenders life.
Teach us to become strong in the Lord, and in the power of your MIGHT.
Our strength is feeble in the face of the Luciferian Genocide.
Teach us to put on the whole armor of God, that we may be able to stand against the wiles of Lucifer
Our struggle is not against mere men of flesh-n-blood, but against authorities and against fallen angelic and demonic powers
against the rulers of the darkness who have assumed high offices of authority.
Teach us how to gain, hold and use, Truth, that has the power to slay evil.
Teach us how to gain, hold and use the protection of righteousness
Ground us in the truth that is the Gospel of Jesus Christ!
Let us take hold of the faith, once and for all delivered unto the saints as our shield
the shield that has the power to protect us from the lies of the propagandists
the propaganda that has produced this culture of death
May our minds become healed and freed from the hypnosis and mind control of the Globalist Mind War Apparatus
May our swords be sharpened with your wisdom
He who is the eternal word of God, the source of all life.
teach us to pray always
to establish constant communion with you, Lord
Give us the prayer of the heart, that we may plead your mercy always, covered in the sacrifice of your blood.
Fill our hearts with gladness that we
may be joyful warriors of God
frightening to the enemy with the energy he cannot understand, nor cope
Cause debilitating fear to rise in the hearts of all who maim and murder
Cause fear to rise in the hearts of those who plan and execute the Genocide
Let their victims haunt them night and day
cause them to use their own mind destroying drugs to seek relief from their tormentors.
cause them to become the victims of their own cunning, of their own diabolical plans
Awaken to repentance those who will.
in the Name of the Father, the author of all good gifts.
in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, the only begotten son of God, by whom all things exist.
In the name of the Holy Spirit the Lord and giver of life
one god
unto the ages of ages
Amen.
(Prayer by Archpriest Symeon Elias - in the world Butch Robinson)

The Las Vegas Mind-Controlled Patsy is NOT the story

The Music Festival was a controlled killing field, an ambush by the Deep State/Shadow Government. There were at least two shooters and most likely the "PATSY" the authorities are offering up was not one of them. My gut says he was dead before the shooting started.

This is WAR people and Las Vegas was an ambush by the enemy forces.  If you think you can continue in the lifestyle of casual "security" you are gravely mistaken. NOW that option is no longer available because they are going to COW you or we are going to DESTROY them, there is no middle ground, no Kumbaya can't we all just get along unity possible with this DEADLY EVIL. Even milquetoast "lil Newt" (Gingrich) said, "These sides cannot be reconciled, one side has to win and the other side has to lose." Our lives mean NOTHING to them. You fight, or you die! Or maybe we fight and die? Better than living the life of a stock animal where, upon occasion, the "Masters cull the herd."

These are the Choices. But realize, THIS IS NOT A CIVIL WAR like ANTIFA hopes it will be.  No, rather if they keep pushing us, we will take down the Oligarchs; there will not be a rock under which those pedophile degenerate Luciferians may hide.

+++

+++

Here is the definitive Multiple Shooter Las Vegas Video, copy it and share it with everyone.

+++

+++

Forensic Acoustic Proffs of Second Shooter


+++

+++