Sunday, January 18, 2015

Is Matter EVIL?


An object lesson for Biblical Fundamentalists, Sola-Scriptura Heretics, Ignorant Biblical Literalists - who have sacrificed Abundant LIVING, (The full experience of THIS feast day of living) to GNOSTIC rejection of the EARTH, WORLD and MATERIAL BEING. Who Claim that GOD's CREATION is EVIL. To those who rape sacred Tradition ripping scriptures from the pages of the Library of Books known as Sacred Scripture or the Canon of Writings, or the Bible, and claim that your LIFE REJECTING theology is found there.



Here is Babe, a Great Pyrenees I rescued as a pup and the pony Kip. I already had five dogs, so my friend with a horse farm took her in, to guard his place. Everyday I would stop by, wrestle with her and let her know she was loved. When she was only eleven months old, a pack of coyotes came for Kip. I saw the security video tape of this animal, endowed by GOD with bravery and nobility, not yet a year old, standing off the coyotes, standing between them and Kip, killing four of them before they surrounded her and took her down. She saved Kip without a scratch. Trust me when I tell you that your LIFE rejecting, EARTH rejecting hardness of heart is a deformity of YOUR spirit and does not accurately reflect the beauty, bravery, and nobility of this SINGLE DOG.
























Thursday, January 8, 2015

Anthony Sutton, THANK YOU!


By 1976, those who were awake and paying attention knew that a completely false consciousness rested in the heart/minds of most Americans we met. Our own families were hypnotized to believe in a reality that was not true.  At the time, I had just met people in the Alternative Energy (free energy) field and was shock to discover the Petroleum Economy, arbitrary and fake. A few years before I became acquainted with Dr Larry McDonald who would become a Congressman and the head of the John Birch Society.  I heard this speech by Anthony Sutton delivered, and if I remember correctly the introduction was by G. Edward Griffin. The decades of the 70 and 80s were by far the most turbulent in my life. By the nineties and Ruby Ridge and Waco I had realized that people would have to be suffering destitution in the streets before they would ever have a chance to wake up. And of course by that time I knew it would have been too late.  

In 2009 I saw my prediction almost come true. In Georgia near the South Carolina border in the fall a year after the crash, I discovered towns of motor homes parked mostly on private property, where people had established "residence."  I discovered it by accident as I witnessed a school bus pick up an entire bus load of children from a fire-break road, where I knew it was at least a mile to the closest house.  When they left, I drove down the fire break to discover more than a hundred motor homes and campers parked in a cow pasture.  I introduced myself to suspicious people and heard the same story again and again, loss jobs, mortgage foreclosure, escape via camper and motor home. A group of us, about 40 people prayed together that day, for everyone who was struggling.  The only reason they were not on the streets destitute is because they had escaped with mobile shelter. More than one family swore that they had been evicted at the hands of their county sheriff, by the bank, and had not been behind on their payments. I thought at the time it was a prideful defensive mechanism at work, only to discover that hundreds of thousands of people were illegally evicted.  We presently exist in a society where the number of vacant houses out number the number of homeless in America.  What could be stranger?   

A little investigation and I discovered that a couple major state parks had been 'closed' because they were occupied by people who had been foreclosed.  That winter there were tens of thousands of motor homes and campers that had become residents in the state of Georgia. I believe that the mortgage displacement was WORSE than Katrina. Hidden and silent.  I tried to get every local and regional news paper or T.V. station to tell this story.  Of course, none of them would touch it. 

NOTHING you learned about the history of the Twentieth Century, about the Russian Revolution, the rise of the NAZIS and Hitler, the Cold War - NONE of it was true. 

For the record, the two most important historians in the Twentieth Century were Antony Sutton and Carroll Quigley, two men who could not possibly have been any more different. Sutton investigated, researched and wrote because he realized the evil the world was facing and the false consciousness that was generated for the masses. Quigley researched and wrote (he didn't have to "investigate")  because he was in the inner circle of the New World Order conspirators and simply by accident confirmed what others have written. 

This lecture/speech is a very good overview of the 20th century up to 1976.   Even at that point he knew that America was a "ghost republic"  in the hands of a "foreign power"  and that, that foreign power was in control of real governance. 
BTW the essential Sutton Books are:
America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones
Wall Street & the Rise of Hitler




Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution.












Wall Street and FDR.













The War on Gold.

The Federal Reserve Conspiracy

Of course Quigley's classic is Tragedy and Hope.  His book "Anglo-American Establishment" is also important.  Don't waste your time on "The Evolution of Civilizations" it is pure conjecture grounded in Social Darwinism - it actually gives the "justification" for the New World Order Rulers to Rule. 

http://youtu.be/mEipMmxSlGU


Tuesday, January 6, 2015

The Hypnotic Assault On Your Soul


In 1923, Dr Robert H Thouless, a Cambridge Psychologist, wrote some amazing things about the control of the masses in his text book, "An Introduction to the Psychology of Religion."  It was the textbook used at Cambridge from the 1920s thru the 1960s.  At the time, Radio was brand new. The first stations were licensed in 1922, and there were only a few stations in the world. So his reference for "mass hypnosis" was speaker and audience in a hall, lectures and sermons. Yet his understanding of the manipulation of people's minds stood the test of time and was taught throughout the "Era of Radio" which really ended in the 1950s as it was supplanted by T.V.  

When talking about creating in others, emotions and thoughts not their own, but instilled through hypnotic suggestion, he taught the boilerplate lessons of light hypnosis and deep hypnosis and cautioned that light hypnosis is more powerful than deep hypnosis, in that someone can easily be placed in this state of light hypnosis, without knowing it.  He described it this way, “A state of half-waking which immediately precedes or follows sleep is one in which suggestibility is very high.”  

This has huge wisdom for us today, since light hypnosis is the "currency" and "power" of Television.  In other words, when you sit and watch the news, and it bores you, or even if the story is interesting they repeat it over and over, they are hypnotizing you, placing their thoughts in your sub-conscious, that later you will spout proudly as your own thoughts, sure that you are properly informed. And you won't just think the thoughts, you will FEEL them. You will hold emotion in what you know. 

This works with the “moral suggestions” of entertainment as well, we buy the underlying morality the "programming" suggests. After all we watch T.V. to “relax” to let go of our rational thoughts, plans, work, worries and how do we say it?, “to veg in front of the television” “watch a PROGRAM”.  We don't examine the content of the PROGRAMS we watch, but instead, FEEL THEM EMOTIONALLY.  We watch our favorite shows because of the ways those shows make us feel. 

If you leave the Television on, while you do other things, then the “programmers” have direct access to your sub-conscious, since the sub-conscious records everything it hears, without filter, without critical analysis, whether you are consciously hearing it or not. That droning emotional language they employ becomes not just your thought, but it becomes your “feelings” about whatever subject they are “conditioning” you to know. 

I realized immediately after 911, that people were walking around in a deep hypnotic state. Their consciousness had been clearly altered, to the point that you could not say, “Hey, what they showed you is physically IMPOSSIBLE.  Buildings cannot defy the LAWS of NATURE.”  To utter such a statement meant people would curse you.  I don't know what I would have done to preserve sanity in that insane society were it not for the wisdom of Saint Anthony's words, “There will come a time, when men will go mad. They will take hold of you and say, 'YOU ARE MAD! YOU ARE NOT LIKE US.”'  And it was literally true, men would become violent, if you dared to question 911.  And the culture was so thoroughly hypnotized that if you sought the truth of the event you were a “truther” a term planted in everyone's minds (emotions) by mass hypnosis of the media. 

What condition does hundreds of hours of T.V. News, PROGRAMS, and Movies create in a person. Does it strengthen their information base?  Does it groom their ability to absorb information with healthy skepticism, analyze the facts and come to a REASONED opinion?  No. One cannot do this by hypnosis. 

What did they know about this all the way back in the 1920s? 


“Suggestibility is heightened by practice.  A person who has been put frequently into the hypnotic state becomes increasingly suggestible. Dr Rivers has pointed out, for example, that the object of military drill is to heighten the suggestibility of the private soldiers so that they may respond immediately and unquestioningly to the commands of their officers. (Apendix to  “Instinct and the Unconscious” Cambridge, 1921)” 

We watch Television almost always in an “altered state,” a state that is “light hypnosis.” One cannot discover the truth of anything, until this habitual behavior of T.V, addiction is conquered, the set turned off, and watched only for short periods of time, “consciously” accepting and rejecting what is true and false according to the “principles” you have to develop away from this medium. And better, examining what is the purpose for each story, what is its psychological-operation.  What is it they want you to FEEL.  

Dr Thouless further states, “The success of a suggestion also depends on how far it conflicts with the mental organization of the person receiving it – with his principles, prejudices, etc.”

But, what happens when all a person knows he has learned in a suggestible hypnotic state before the tube? Or via movies? What happens when the person does not actually have any principles NOT programmed by the Mind Control Experts.  For that person, learning anything new, anything real has to feel like dying, like completely losing one's self. 

“It will be received with difficulty if he has a well organised system of belief or of principles of conduct with which it conflicts.”

This is why the media has pressed moral relativism and taught Solipsism, to remove from you, any principled ability to judge anything for yourself.  The media constantly provides you with a false debate, a FAKE debate on Cable T.V., 24/7, created in the Brainwashing methods of the Hegelian Dialectic. You take one side or the other, and argue the FALSEHOODS, day in and day out on social media. 

“It (the hypnotic suggestions) will be received most readily if there is previously existing in his mind a disposition to accept it.  It is not true (although it is often stated) that, even under hypnosis, a man can never be made to do anything he believes to be morally wrong.”  Then he explains that the more often a person leaves themselves open to “suggestibility” the more the person's own principles can be subverted.  And that in deep hypnosis, (what we today call Mind Control and Brainwashing) not only can a person's principles be subverted, but their core personality can be permanently altered.

Under MASSIVE Hypnosis, following 9/11 this society CHEERED as their last rights were taken away, as their legal system was destroy, as Congress and the Court became mere “show bodies.”  You see, you were not just asleep, you were engaged in the cause of your SLAVER, helping him . . . yessa-massa . .  to enslave you, cheering for the enslaving laws, after all we had those emotional phrases, “National Emergency” and “Patriot Act.”  This is far worse than merely being asleep, this is sanity having been removed, this is a foreign set of values installed at your core, this is you becoming a functioning puppet, thinking and speaking thoughts that were antithetical to your SURVIVAL in Liberty and maybe, just maybe contrary to your physical survival as well.  Time will tell. 

This is just the simplest most basic thesis on hypnotic suggestion, which I have outlined. One has to realize that the CIA Mind Control methods, discovered and perfected by decades of experimentation has dimensions not touched here, and is so very much more powerful than this simple premise I have outlined. And what I have outline is HELLISHLY powerful.

The MIND WAR Luciferian Warriors have been conditioning you for decades, so that now, it is very, very difficult for the average person to view objective facts and then by logic, interpret what these facts mean and come to reasoned conclusions, in the REAL WORLD, so that one may then ACT with sanity.  The operation of “emotional thinking” has replaced critical thinking, and people cling to what they “feel” is true, even when objective proof and clear evidence prove that what they “feel” is true, cannot in fact, in the real world, be TRUE. 


Let me give you the most elementary lesson in “factual language” vs “emotional language” in the words of Dr. Thouless:  

“WE can use language in more than one way. When we write or say such a sentence as "Rover is a dog", we are doing no more than stating a fact. Let us call this the ' factual ' use of language.

“Now let us suppose that one of Rover's grandparents was a collie, another was an Irish terrier, another a fox terrier, and the fourth a bulldog. We can express these facts by saying that he is a dog of mixed breed. Still we have in no way gone beyond the use of language in the factual manner.

“Suppose, however, that we had called that same animal a 'mongrel'. The matter is more complicated. We have used a word which means the same in fact as does 'dog of mixed breed', but which also arouses in our hearers an emotional attitude of disapproval towards that particular dog. A word, therefore, can not only indicate a fact, but can also suggest an emotional attitude towards it. Such suggestion of an emotional attitude does go beyond mere factual description because our approvals and disapprovals are individual— they belong to ourselves and not to the objects we approve or disapprove of. An animal which to the mind of its master is a faithful and noble dog of mixed ancestry may be a 'mongrel' to his neighbour whose chickens are chased by it.

“Similarly, a Negro may be indicated factually as a 'coloured man' or with strong emotional disapproval and contempt as a 'nigger'. The use of the latter word debases any discussion in which it is used below the level of impartial and objective argument.

“Once we are on the look-out for this difference between factual and emotional meanings, we shall notice that words which carry more or less strong suggestions of emotional attitudes are very common and are ordinarily used in the discussion of such controversial questions as those of politics, morals, and religion. This is one reason why men can go on discussing such questions without getting much nearer to a rational solution of them.”

This art of “emotional language” is the entire structure of T.V. News.  None of it is objective. All of it is stated emotionally for a “suggestive impact.”  The Talking Heads, continually use the plural pronouns, “we are so concerned about x, y or z.”  “we are doing all in our power to help”  “we really need to be thinking about this” constantly including YOU, the listener in the herd.  This is herd hypnosis, creating massive “waves of feelings” in the country, in the society. This was first examined by Dr Trotter in “Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War” and by Dr Rivers in “Instinct and the Unconscious” and by Dr E Prideaux, “Suggestion and Suggestibility” in the 19-teens and early 1920 in the British Journal of Psychology.  And I'm sure most people who read it at the time thought it “egghead mumbo-jumbo”  when in FACT it has become the STATE of American Society. 

“To it” (that is herd hypnotic suggestibility) “are due the waves of feeling which pass over a whole country, such as the anger which is felt when a country is attacked or insulted.  The greater part of the very large mass of opinions which a man has not thought out for himself, he owes to the influence of 'herd-suggestion'. Even in the opinions which he believes he has thought out, he is not free from its effects. His methods of thought, the things he has assumed as axiomatic, are all more or less determined for him by the society in which he finds himself.  Thus herd-suggestion is a powerful force influencing the formation of belief to an extent greater than most people are willing to admit.”



REMEMBER, he was writing in PRE-RADIO days, BEFORE the massive tools of Radio and Television were on the scene.  He understood these facts, when the largest “herd-suggestion” was that of a crowd gathers to hear a sermon or a speech, or the powerful influence of the News Papers of that era.  But even the process of reading a News Paper causes a person to  judge what they were reading.  You cannot read in a semi-sleep state. You cannot read and be disengaged, daydreaming and suggestible.  But you most certainly can be very suggestible while half listening to verbal lectures, droning news, and powerful suggestive images flashed in your eyes as you relax in a half conscious stupor.  The second the media is left droning on, and you think of something else, or your mind goes blank, YOU ARE BEING PROGRAMMED.  And the hypnotic tools they are using, repeating the same emotional stories over and over and over and over - - - can't you see it?  Just like the pocket watch swinging back and forth.
  


Turn the T.V. OFF.

Praying you will find the power to disconnect yourself from the brainwashing media.  Most people I know talk incessantly about "restoring liberty" - that goal is impossible until you find the FORCE in yourself, to take control of your own psyche and TURN OFF THE T.V.  It isn't an option if you ever again want to experience Liberty.

A German Reporter is blowing the lid off the media propaganda conspiracy I've been screaming about for decades. ALL the Press are Intelligence assets, bought and paid for.
http://youtu.be/Adz-cLDZGBU



Archpriest Symeon Elias



Saturday, January 3, 2015

"Tyranny Cannot Happen Here!" Really?

What is Objective Force and Influence of the American Constitution on contemporary American Individuals, the American Government and Culture? 
Does the U.S. Constitution Retain The Power To Save Us? 
or Do We Have To Act With Force To Save Ourselves?
Please watch "It Can't Happen Here" and learn the answers.


The first part of the video is a boring interview.
Here is a link to fast forward to 1 hour 16 minutes and 50 seconds, just before the Documentary begins.

http://youtu.be/ApMNKGT6eE8?t=1h16m50s



Speaking the Truth to Power Takes Courage.  Already the Omni-Surveillance State has caused a near total destruction of "investigative journalism" which is the ONLY journalism that is REAL. It is in fact, almost impossible to tell the difference in the journalistic styles and content in the Totalitarian States and the States claiming to be free.  99.99% of the writers in both just regurgitate what they are told from "official sources."  Too many whistles blowers and investigative journalists have died under "unusual circumstances" to believe they are just the most unlucky class of people on earth.

What follows is a mirror from Russia Today (RT) exposing the cowardice that grips "writers" in "free countries."  If 30 percent admit they are intimidated by the secret government powers, and are self-censoring you can bet the actual number is much higher.  After all, we are experiencing a period of history in the West, where even admitting distrust of the government, or the U.N. or the World Bank, or the CIA, or the CIA's financial wing the IMF, may be viewed as a statement of subversion.  That is enough to get you placed on a "watch list" since those who distrust government are seen according the Department of Homeland Security's "Threat Assessment" and the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), as possible terrorists, possible threats to "National Security" subject to arrest and incarceration without trial or even assassination on the word of "the President or other high ranking federal official."  Honest that is the exact language.


​Mass surveillance breeds self-censorship in democracies - report

Published time: January 05, 2015 21:18
Reuters / Jason Reed
Reuters / Jason Reed
1.2K3289
A study published by a top US literary organization on Monday, found that an increasing number of writers in democratic countries are censoring themselves due to fears about government surveillance.
The study entitled “Global chilling: The impact of Mass Surveillance on International Writers” surveyed 772 writers in 50 countries and concluded that writers and journalists are self-censoring for fear of reprisal.
A similar report published in November 2013 found that writers were “worried about mass surveillance, and were engaged in multiple forms of self-censorship as a result.”
A full report from writers around the world will be issued in the spring of 2015. As writers are considered to be the “canaries in the coalmine” therefore they are likely to give an accurate picture of the impact of surveillance on privacy and freedom of expression.
Writers living in democratic countries were found to be nearly as concerned as those living in non-democratic states with long histories of mass surveillance.
It found that while 61 percent of writers living in the countries labeled as ‘Not Free’ by Freedom House avoided writing or speaking about a certain topic because of government surveillance this was now true of 34 percent of writers in ‘Free’ countries.
Reuters / Kieran Doherty
Reuters / Kieran Doherty


“Writers are concerned that expressing certain views even privately or researching certain topics may lead to negative consequences,” the study concluded.
It also found that writers outside the US shared many of the same fears and uncertainties, particularly in the countries in the Five Eyes alliance of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and US.
One respondent said he “hesitated – and thought to answer very honestly – these questions.”
There was also a sharp decline in how writers viewed the US as a haven for free expression, with 36 percent of writers surveyed in so-called ‘Free’ countries believing that their own country offers better protection for freedom of expression than the US.
The Pen document ends with recommendations that the US government stops dragnet monitoring and the collection of US citizen’s communications. It also advises that collection of digital metadata be suspended and advises greater judicial, legislative and executive oversight of US intelligence agency programs.
It also pointed out that the US has to respect the privacy and rights to free expression of foreign citizens either in or out of the US.
"As the United Nations has repeatedly stated, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which the US is a party, requires it to respect the human rights to privacy and free expression of all individuals affected by its surveillance programs," the report says.