Observation vs Discernment: War Plan

And here is the difference between an observer and a discerner. The first time I saw Obama (turn of century) “the rising star” I knew he was a hypnotic-master wearing a CIA cutout suit. When he spoke people stood in hypnotic awe, with frozen smiles on the faces as he read the TelePrompter with more talent than I had ever before witnessed, reading with hypnotic cadence and swaying from side to side as he rhythmically turn from right prompter to left just like the swing of a pocket watch. People didn’t hear what he had to say they felt what he was saying. There was no rational comprehension and analysis, nothing he said was note worthy or controversial, no memorable lines just a steady diet of everyone’s wet dreams. What people got from the experience was nebulous sense of Hope and Change that by some means of magic would be fair and elevating for all. There was never the suspicion that the entire world economy had been Purposely Crashed so his hypnotic Marxist message would have fertile ground in people struggling with fear and despair.

For your own education google one of Obama’s 2008 rallies and then one of Trump’s 2016 rallies and behind Trump you will see instead of frozen smiles and hushed reverence people animated, talking to one another, commenting on what they were hearing and seeing; even discussing what he was saying as he was speaking; people engaged instead of hypnotized. Instead of the “perfect Obama speech” they got a symphonic non-canned speaker, starting and stopping, digressing and tying in the digression, engaging them with questions over and over. Fast forward to today 90+ days to go. Once again the Globalists have tried with every tool at their disposal to crash the world economy, they have created panic in a pandemic, but failed to turn Covid into Trump’s Katrina. Having shot their charismatic savior wad in Obama and as far as I can see they have no CIA-charismatic cutout in the wings... well they have prospects but none that will vet and the American people have taken control the vetting process themselves. Leaving them the anti-Obama in the Covid Basement, a man total devoid of any oratory skills mumbling through limited exposures. Instead they have turned all their time and energy, with the power of the FAKE public health establishment and its Continuation of Government Powers and Communist Chinese Controlled media via Multi-front suicidal Asymmetric Warfare to destroy however much of America and the world, for that matter, to hamstring, neutralize and Kill Trump and the American Conservative Nationalist Movement. They intend to kill us, no joke. Inside this very real context Lionel is shocked that Obama would use the corpse and memory as a weapon of asymmetric war? You see he is a keen observer, I am a practiced discerner who knew the weapon value of that corpse. The enemy asymmetric war strategists are always steps ahead of people whose level of perception is mere observation. They are left totally surprised by events and have only one weapon, “reaction” which in truth is choreographed by the enemy. Thus 99% of Libertarian, Independent and Conservative observers function in fact at the command of our enemy. Some knowingly, the plants, and some honestly, unaware of their role. In either case the role is always to react to the narrative which is controlled by the enemy. What is so very frightening about Trump is that he has (until hamstrung by the command of our enemy. Some knowingly, the plants, and some honestly, unaware of their role. In either case the role is always to react to the narrative which is controlled by the enemy. What is so very frightening about Trump is that he has (until hamstrung by the Public Health Continuation Of Government MARXISTS) been able to create NOT a counter narrative but an ORIGINAL one. Thus making the massive world disinformation structure react to HIM. HE MAY NOT REGAIN THIS POWER between now and the election and powers of mere observation at this point in time are WORTHLESS since little we are seeing is real and what little seen that is real is so deadly most suffer cognitive dissonance and believe this is merely an election and not the raging Asymmetric World War WITH Globalism where China - is the central weapon activated in coordination with legacy Globalist structures and every tentacle of infiltration into every area of society and life. At this point discernment is our only weapon since we have to discount, ignore, the Marxist Smokescreens ie every weapon of psyops-fear and plays on emotion and sentimentality, grasp the core of the enemy’s Capitalist/Communist power and recognize the depth of it power able to hamstring an American President, destroy the power of the Trump rallies and gaslight an irrational fear driven public into mask-turbation and even now goggle- wearing. These are either the birth pains of our Liberation from Luciferian Globalist enslavement or the death-throes of humanity with nothing to look forward to but dystopian trans-humanist cyborg utopia
resulting in a near extinction event as the majority of humans are culled from the planet. Not conspiracy theory, they have repeatedly stated their goals. At this point to win this battle, this level of discernment/assessment is objectively necessary, mere observation of events and reaction to them is Suicide. There was an episode of Star Trek, I don’t remember the series or movie or episode other than it contained the scenario where the more intensely the Enterprise reacted to the enemy the greater the next attack. In other words their reaction to the enemy’s attack was amplifying the enemies power. That has great wisdom for present tactics but not long term strategy. We cannot conquer their psyops control mechanism until it has all the power of a tree falling in the woods with no human hearing.  We cannot stop the tree from falling but we can deny them our observation of it and create our own narrative, massively destroy their election farce, surrender our fear in FAITH AND Take up our arms and live our lives. This ordinary thing they cannot conquer. END.

Covid Crimes

newsweek.com

The key to defeating COVID-19 already exists. We need to start using it | Opinion

Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD

8-10 minutes

---

As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.
I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.
On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, "Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis." That article, published in the world's leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.
Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.

0:05/0:50

Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit. In a lengthy follow-up letter, also published by AJE, I discuss these seven studies and renew my call for the immediate early use of hydroxychloroquine in high-risk patients. These seven studies include: an additional 400 high-risk patients treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, with zero deaths; four studies totaling almost 500 high-risk patients treated in nursing homes and clinics across the U.S., with no deaths; a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil, with significantly reduced risk of hospitalization and two deaths among 334 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine; and another study of 398 matched patients in France, also with significantly reduced hospitalization risk. Since my letter was published, even more doctors have reported to me their completely successful use.

My original article in the AJE is available free online, and I encourage readers—especially physicians, nurses, physician assistants and associates, and respiratory therapists—to search the title and read it. My follow-up letter is linked there to the original paper.
Beyond these studies of individual patients, we have seen what happens in large populations when these drugs are used. These have been "natural experiments." In the northern Brazil state of Pará, COVID-19 deaths were increasing exponentially. On April 6, the public hospital network purchased 75,000 doses of azithromycin and 90,000 doses of hydroxychloroquine. Over the next few weeks, authorities began distributing these medications to infected individuals. Even though new cases continued to occur, on May 22 the death rate started to plummet and is now about one-eighth what it was at the peak.

Hydroxychloroquine tablets GEORGE FREY/AFP via Getty Images

A reverse natural experiment happened in Switzerland. On May 27, the Swiss national government banned outpatient use of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. Around June 10, COVID-19 deaths increased four-fold and remained elevated. On June 11, the Swiss government revoked the ban, and on June 23 the death rate reverted to what it had been beforehand. People who die from COVID-19 live about three to five weeks from the start of symptoms, which makes the evidence of a causal relation in these experiments strong. Both episodes suggest that a combination of hydroxychloroquine and its companion medications reduces mortality and should be immediately adopted as the new standard of care in high-risk patients.
Why has hydroxychloroquine been disregarded?
First, as all know, the medication has become highly politicized. For many, it is viewed as a marker of political identity, on both sides of the political spectrum. Nobody needs me to remind them that this is not how medicine should proceed. We must judge this medication strictly on the science. When doctors graduate from medical school, they formally promise to make the health and life of the patient their first consideration, without biases of race, religion, nationality, social standing—or political affiliation. Lives must come first.
Second, the drug has not been used properly in many studies. Hydroxychloroquine has shown major success when used early in high-risk people but, as one would expect for an antiviral, much less success when used late in the disease course. Even so, it has demonstrated significant benefit in large hospital studies in Michigan and New York City when started within the first 24 to 48 hours after admission.
In fact, as inexpensive, oral and widely available medications, and a nutritional supplement, the combination of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin or doxycycline, and zinc are well-suited for early treatment in the outpatient setting. The combination should be prescribed in high-risk patients immediately upon clinical suspicion of COVID-19 disease, without waiting for results of testing. Delays in waiting before starting the medications can reduce their efficacy.
Third, concerns have been raised by the FDA and others about risks of cardiac arrhythmia, especially when hydroxychloroquine is given in combination with azithromycin. The FDA based its comments on data in its FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. This reporting system captured up to a thousand cases of arrhythmias attributed to hydroxychloroquine use. In fact, the number is likely higher than that, since the reporting system, which requires physicians or patients to initiate contact with the FDA, appreciably undercounts drug side effects.
But what the FDA did not announce is that these adverse events were generated from tens of millions of patient uses of hydroxychloroquine for long periods of time, often for the chronic treatment of lupus or rheumatoid arthritis. Even if the true rates of arrhythmia are ten-fold higher than those reported, the harms would be minuscule compared to the mortality occurring right now in inadequately treated high-risk COVID-19 patients. This fact is proven by an Oxford University study of more than 320,000 older patients taking both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, who had arrhythmia excess death rates of less than 9/100,000 users, as I discuss in my May 27 paper cited above. A new paper in the American Journal of Medicine by established cardiologists around the world fully agrees with this.
In the future, I believe this misbegotten episode regarding hydroxychloroquine will be studied by sociologists of medicine as a classic example of how extra-scientific factors overrode clear-cut medical evidence. But for now, reality demands a clear, scientific eye on the evidence and where it points. For the sake of high-risk patients, for the sake of our parents and grandparents, for the sake of the unemployed, for our economy and for our polity, especially those disproportionally affected, we must start treating immediately.
Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD, is professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.
The views expressd in this article are the writer's own.