Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NWO. Show all posts

Thursday, December 4, 2014

The Foundational Delusion of Our Era Is Naturalism


Driving for my elderly Ukrainian Orthodox Bishop I quickly noticed that when he passed some Protestant Churches he made the sign of the Cross in a blessing. I asked, "Why do you give blessings to churches you know teach error?"  It seemed counter intuitive to me.  He said, "Whether they are church or not we cannot truly know, but we know they are schools of religion who teach something true about Jesus Christ and American society would be so much the worse off without them."  We passed by the Mormon Temple on Woodward Ave in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and he looked over and shook his head no.  I did not bother to ask, I knew the difference, he had done the same at two Jehovah Witness buildings.  Here is an Evangelical Church being an excellent "school" not so much of "religion" but for Christ's sake exposing the insanity of the Scientistic Dictatorship's Darwinian Delusions. 

I cannot help but compare this excellent presentation of the Truth of the state of the SCIENCE concerning "evolution," to a series of lectures (many hours long) given by Father Thomas Hopko on Ancient Faith Radio.  I'm embarrassed for Orthodoxy - though Fr Tom made clear he was speaking for himself and not for the Orthodox Church, that his examination of "the Theory of Evolution" was just his personal journey, at the same time he, a very well respected teacher of Orthodoxy, was on THE major voice of Orthodoxy (speaking to the culture) in America. What would any casual listener think?  His conclusion after 20 plus hours of lecturing (some of it that was quite good, by the way) "Come on, you have to see that there is something too it. There is too much evidence, too many great scientist believe it. It has to be TRUE."  I had listened intently and knew where he was going after about the second week, but still, hearing those words from his mouth STILL made my jaw drop.  Sorry, for all his knowledge of Orthodoxy his wisdom just did not translate into the fields of Physics, Biology and Molecular Biology and he was all but DEAD WRONG. I say all but, because, yes there is something to it, there is demonstrated certain abilities of adaptation of species, inside the confines of "pre-programmed information" present and dormant in D.N.A. structure, allowing for changes within certain limits, the result of environment over time. Some of this can happen quite quickly as the Russian Gray Fox experiments have proved. However, it does not signal the "creation" of anything, merely the expression of dormant D.N.A. programming. 

The state of the Science of Evolution has been exposed by modern empirical scientific observation, obvious even to the layman with a little study, to be a truly out dated and even a superstitious view of Life's Origin, invoking the magic of "spontaneous generation" as it does. Comparing a drop of pre-biotic primordial soup (if any such ever existed) to a single cell, is like comparing a slab of rock to a computer.  There is no feasible way to get by non-intelligent/random means, from the first to the second. With a little study a great many people can understand the absolute physical impossibility of Darwinism, from MANY different angles and several different disciplines.  Here is a wonderful place to start. 

I was first introduced to Michael Behe, through excerpts of his writing in Michael A Cremo's book "Human Devolution - A Vedic Alternative to the Darwin Theory." I have not read his book, "Darwin's Black Box."  At the time I did not know that Behe was a Christian. I'm not surprised to learn it. I have read several articles written by Behe over the years. 

I'm was not familiar with Stephen Meyer, but I will soon read his two books, "Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design" and "Darwin's Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design"

I have read David Berlinski's excellent book, " The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions.    


We all need to create our own language in this cultural battle, learn the vocabulary and learn how to stand mind-dead and demon possessed Evolutionists on their heads, how to leave them speechless, (if they are honestly ignorant) and cursing if they are purposely deceiving. 

If you want to lean to be a warrior for Truth, when dealing with those who are mired in the delusions of the culture, you have to be able to topple the Jericho Walls of LIES erected to block the true view of God's Creation and thus the Context for Christ's work.  The walls of Lies created by the "Enlightenment" are Secular Humanism - Marxism/Communism/Socialism, Freudianism -  Secular Psychology and Psychiatry, Corporate Pharmaceutical Practice of Medicine, all based upon the foundation of  "NATURALISM" - the Extreme Materialism of Darwinian Evolutionism.  These walls obscure and even block the view of True Nature and this includes "true human nature."  One has to smash to powder the foundation, which is Darwinism and the other walls begin to teeter, and quickly fall.

+++
Archpriest Symeon Elias









Dissenting Scientist Ralph Seelke Discusses His Doubts About Darwin


In this interview, Dr. Ralph Seelke shares about his current evolution research, and why he is skeptical of Darwinian evolution.
Click here to listen.

Ralph Seelke received his Ph.D. in Microbiology from the University of Minnesota and the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine in 1981, was a postdoctoral researcher at the Mayo Clinic until 1983, and has been an Associate Professor or Professor in the Department of Biology and Earth Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Superior since 1989. An authority on evolution's capabilities and limitations in producing new functions in bacteria, Prof. Seelke recently co-authored the science textbook "Explore Evolution: The Case For and Against Neo-Darwinism."


Professor Colin Reeves, Coventry University

Darwinism was an interesting idea in the 19th century, when handwaving explanations gave a plausible, if not properly scientific, framework into which we could fit biological facts. However, what we have learned since the days of Darwin throws doubt on natural selection's ability to create complex biological systems - and we still have little more than handwaving as an argument in its favour.
Professor Colin Reeves
Dept of Mathematical Sciences
Coventry University
Edward Peltzer, University of California, San Diego (Scripps Institute)

As a chemist, the most fascinating issue for me revolves around the origin of life. Before life began, there was no biology, only chemistry -- and chemistry is the same for all time. What works (or not) today, worked (or not) back in the beginning. So, our ideas about what happened on Earth prior to the emergence of life are eminently testable in the lab. And what we have seen thus far when the reactions are left unguided as they would be in the natural world is not much. Indeed, the decomposition reactions and competing reactions out distance the synthetic reactions by far. It is only when an intelligent agent (such as a scientist or graduate student) intervenes and "tweaks" the reactions conditions "just right" do we see any progress at all, and even then it is still quite limited and very far from where we need to get. Thus, it is the very chemistry that speaks of a need for something more than just time and chance. And whether that be simply a highly specified set of initial conditions (fine-tuning) or some form of continual guidance until life ultimately emerges is still unknown. But what we do know is the random chemical reactions are both woefully insufficient and are often working against the pathways needed to succeed. For these reasons I have serious doubts about whether the current Darwinian paradigm will ever make additional progress in this area.
Edward Peltzer
Ph.D. Oceanography, University of California, San Diego (Scripps Institute)
Associate Editor, Marine Chemistry


Chris Williams, Ph.D., Biochemistry Ohio State University
As a biochemist and software developer who works in genetic and metabolic screening, I am continually amazed by the incredible complexity of life. For example, each of us has a vast 'computer program' of six billion DNA bases in every cell that guided our development from a fertilized egg, specifies how to make more than 200 tissue types, and ties all this together in numerous highly functional organ systems. Few people outside of genetics or biochemistry realize that evolutionists still can provide no substantive details at all about the origin of life, and particularly the origin of genetic information in the first self-replicating organism. What genes did it require -- or did it even have genes? How much DNA and RNA did it have -- or did it even have nucleic acids? How did huge information-rich molecules arise before natural selection? Exactly how did the genetic code linking nucleic acids to amino acid sequence originate? Clearly the origin of life -- the foundation of evolution - is still virtually all speculation, and little if no fact.

+++


There is scientific dissent to Darwinism. It deserves to be heard.

www.discovery.org

A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM

(scientists listed by doctoral degree or current position)


"WE ARE SKEPTICAL OF CLAIMS FOR THE ABILITY OF RANDOM MUTATION
AND NATURAL SELECTION TO ACCOUNT FOR THE COMPLEXITY OF LIFE.
CAREFUL EXAMINATION OF THE EVIDENCE FOR DARWINIAN THEORY SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED.”
Henry F. Schaefer, Nobel Nominee, Director of Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, U. of Georgia 

Fred Sigworth, Prof. of Cellular & Molecular Physiology, Yale Grad.
School 

Philip S. Skell, Emeritus Prof. Of Chemistry, NAS member 

Frank Tipler, Prof. of Mathematical Physics, Tulane U. 

Robert Kaita, Plasma Physics Lab, Princeton 

Michael Behe, Prof. of Biological Science, Lehigh U. 

Walter Hearn, PhD Biochemistry-U. of Illinois 

Tony Mega, Assoc. Prof. of Chemistry, Whitworth College 

Dean Kenyon, Prof. Emeritusof Biology, San Francisco State 

Marko Horb, Researcher, Dept. of Biology & Biochemistry, U. of Bath 

Daniel Kuebler, Asst. Prof. of Biology, Franciscan U. of Steubenville 

David Keller,  Assoc. Prof. of Chemistry, U. of New Mexico 

James Keesling, Prof. of Mathematics, U. of Florida 

Roland F. Hirsch, PhD Analytical Chemistry-U. of Michigan  

Robert Newman, PhD Astrophysics-Cornell U. 

Carl Koval,  Prof., Chemistry & Biochemistry, U. of Colorado 

Tony Jelsma, Prof. of Biology, Dordt College 

William A. Dembski, PhD Mathematics-U. of Chicago 

George Lebo, Assoc. Prof. of Astronomy, U. of Florida 

Timothy G. Standish, PhD Environmental Biology-George Mason U. 

James Keener, Prof. of Mathematics &  Adjunct of Bioengineering, U. of Utah 

Robert J. Marks, Prof. of Signal & Image Processing, U. of Washington 

Carl Poppe, Senior Fellow, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories 

Siegfried Scherer, Prof. of Microbial Ecology, Technische Universität München 

Gregory Shearer, Postdoc. Researcher Internal Medicine, U. C. Davis 

Joseph Atkinson PhD Organic Chemistry-M.I.T., American Chemical Society member 

Lawrence H. Johnston, Emeritus Prof. of Physics, U. of Idaho 

Scott Minnich, Prof., Dept of Microbiology, Molecular Biology & Biochemistry, U.

of Idaho 

David A. DeWitt, PhD Neuroscience-Case Western U. 

Theodor Liss, PhD Chemistry-M.I.T. 

Braxton Alfred, Emeritus Prof. of Anthropology, U. of British Columbia  Walter 

Bradley, Prof. Emeritus of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A & M 

Paul D. Brown, Asst. Prof. of Environmental Studies, Trinity Western (Canada) 

Marvin Fritzler, Prof. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, U. of Calgary, Medical School 

Theodore Saito, Project Manager, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories 

Muzaffar Iqbal, PhD Chemistry-U. of Saskatchewan, Center for Theology
and the Natural Sciences  

S.William Pelletier, Emeritus Distinguished Prof. of Chemistry, U. of Georgia 

Keith Delaplane, Prof. of Entomology, U. of Georgia 

Ken Smith, Prof. of Mathematics, Central Michigan U. 

Clarence Fouche, Prof. of Biology, Virginia Intermont College 

Thomas Milner, Asst. Prof. of Biomedical Engineering, U. of Texas, Austin 

Brian J.Miller, PhD Physics-Duke U. 

Paul Nesselroade, Assoc. Prof. of Psychology, Simpson College 

Donald F. Calbreath, Prof. of Chemistry, Whitworth College

William P. Purcell, PhD Physical Chemistry-Princeton

Wesley Allen, Prof. of Computational Quantum
Chemistry, U. of Georgia  

Jeanne Drisko, Asst. Prof., Kansas Medical Center, U. of Kansas 

Chris Grace, Assoc. Prof. of Psychology, Biola U. 

Wolfgang Smith, Prof. Emeritus of Mathematics-Oregon State 

Rosalind Picard, Assoc. Prof. Computer Science,
M.I.T. 

Garrick Little, Senior Scientist, Li-Cor  

John L. Omdahl, Prof. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, U. of New Mexico 

Martin Poenie, Assoc. Prof. of Molecular Cell & Developmental Biology, U. of Texas, 
Austin 

Russell W. Carlson, Prof. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, U. of Georgia 

Hugh Nutley, Prof. Emeritus of Physics & Engineering, Seattle Pacific U. 

David Berlinski, PhD Philosophy-Princeton, Mathematician, Author 

Nei Broom, Assoc. Prof., Chemical & Materials Engineering, U. of Auckland 

John Bloom, Assoc. Prof., Physics, Biola U. 

James Graham, Professional Geologist, Sr. Program Manager, National
Environmental Consulting Firm 

John Baumgardner, Technical Staff, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos
National Laboratory 

Fred Skiff, Prof. of Physics, U. of Iowa 

Paul Kuld, Assoc. Prof., Biological Science, Biola U. 

Yongsoon Park, Senior Research Scientist, St. Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City 

Moorad Alexanian, Prof. of Physics, U. of North Carolina, Wilmington 

Donald Ewert, Director of Research Administration, Wistar Institute 

Joseph W. Francis, Assoc. Prof. of Biology, Cedarville U. 

Thomas Saleska, Prof. of Biology, Concordia U.  

Ralph W. Seelke, Prof. & Chair of Dept. of Biology & Earth Sciences, U. of 
Wisconsin, Superior 

James G. Harman, Assoc. Chair, Dept. of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Texas Tech U. 

Lennart Moller, Prof. of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Inst., U. of Stockholm 

Raymond G. Bohlin, PhD Molecular & Cell Biology-U. of Texas 

Fazale R. Rana, PhD Chemistry-Ohio U. 

Michael Atchison, Prof. of Biochemistry, U. of Pennsylvania, Vet School 

William S. Harris, Prof. of Basic Medical Sciences, U. of Missouri 

Rebecca W. Keller, Research Prof., Dept. of Chemistry, U. of New Mexico 

Terry Morrison, PhD Chemistry-Syracuse U. 

Robert F. DeHaan, PhD Human Development-U. of Chicago 

Matti Leisola, Prof., Laboratory of Bioprocess Engineering, Helsinki U. of Technology  

Bruce Evans, Assoc. Prof.of Biology, Huntington College 

Jim Gibson, PhD Biology-Loma Linda U.  

David Ness, PhD Anthropology-Temple U. 

Bijan Nemati, PhD Physics, Senior Engineer, Jet Propulsion Lab (NASA) 

Edward T. Peltzer, Senior Research Specialist, Monterey Bay Research Institute 

Stan E. Lennard, Clinical Assoc. Prof. of Surgery, U. of Washington 

Rafe Payne, Prof. & Chair, Dept. of Biological Sciences, Biola U. 

Phillip Savage, Prof. of Chemical Engineering, U. of Michigan 

Pattle Pun, Prof. of Biology, Wheaton College 

Jed Macosko, Postdoc. Researcher Molecular Biology, U.C. Berkeley 

Daniel Dix, Assoc. Prof. of Mathematics, U. of South Carolina 

Ed Karlow, Chair, Dept. of Physics, LaSierra U. 

James Harbrecht, Clinical Assoc. Prof., U. of Kansas Medical Center  

Robert W. Smith, Prof. of Chemistry, U. of Nebraska  

Robert DiSilvestro, PhD Biochemistry-Texas A & M  

David Prentice, Prof., Dept. of Life Sciences, Indiana State U. 

Walt Stangl, Assoc. Prof. of Mathematics, Biola U. 

Jonathan Wells, PhD Molecular & Cell Biology-U.C. Berkeley 

James Tour, Chao Prof. of Chemistry, Rice U. 

Todd Watson, Asst. Prof. of Urban & Community Forestry, Texas A & M 

Robert Waltzer, Assoc. Prof. of Biology, Belhaven College 

Vincente Villa, Prof. of Biology, Southwestern U. 

 James Tumlin, Assoc. Prof. of Medicine, Emory U. 

Charles Thaxton, PhD Physical Chemistry-Iowa State U. 

Stephen C. Meyer, PhD Philosophy of Science-Cambridge 

Paul Nelson, PhD Philosophy of Biology-U. of Chicago 

Richard Sternberg, Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institute

Sunday, September 7, 2014

New Age Movement = New World Order


When I speak of the MIND WAR Warriors, and their Mind Control System, the New World Order Power Structure, and the several "psycho-political schemes" that work presently in unison, that being Secularism, Occultism, New Ageism, NeoConservatism, Progressivism and Islam - All being Luciferian - if you do not understand the tie, the coordination, the thing that ties them together and has made them function in the last forty years in UNISON, please take the time to hear this Christian Lawyer's experience. I didn't learn anything new here, but I can testify that her cogent presentation is a MUST SEE. The collection of Mind War Facts she ties together are absolutely accurate and TRUE. 

People grieving at the loss of our Republic, everyday ask me, "What can we do?" Few understand my answer when I say:
We have to answer the questions, 
"Where are we?" and 
"How did we get here?" and 
"Can we existentially prove our answers to questions (1) and (2). 
Most have NO clue what I mean. They think I am speaking simply about the corruption of government that ended in the lost of the Republic. They are one-tenth right. What the don't understand is that the NINE-TENTHS is THEIR loss of THEIR Christian Heritage, which causes THEM the inability to perceive TRUTH and leaves THEM victims of the Mind War. 

The Mind War is Multi-faceted. Please take time to view and understand this presentation. If you have questions or opinions AFTER watching it, express them. If you do not watch the video, please refrain from commenting.

Notice that her "New Age Experience" began from books sold at Cokesbury Book Store - the official Book Store of the United Methodist Church.  When I named in my article on the MIND WAR, the instruments they use for brainwashing I was not exaggerating adding - "Social Justice Christianity."  I should have added to the list, Gnostic, Marxist and Occultic Christianity as well. In my journey across the decades I have witnessed all these in full bloom parading as "Christian Church."

THE MIND WAR - WHAT IS IT? 

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

More On the Depth of the Mind War.

Are you living in a stunned hypnotic state, thinking rather it is just life as usual, maybe more challenged, still nothing but the old remedies will work?

This conversation reflects the depth of the damage of the MIND WAR and people endlessly repeat the same processes expecting different result.  Rex Christi, someone I believe to be sincere and truly concerned for his nation demonstrates "Cognitive Dissonance" which he substitutes for reason. Like I say, I believe him to be sincere, a bright young articulate, libertarian leaning conservative Roman Catholic, yet Cognitive Dissonance is the closest he can come to reason.

Let us jump ahead to the cognitive dissonance part. You know that cognitive dissonance is thorough belief in two truths, or sets of truth, each destroying the reality of the other.

Here is where Rex expresses cognitive dissonance. "I don't doubt that a practical coup has already occurred. Nor do I doubt that it was perpetrated by both national parties and that the grassroots are persistently subverted."
AND
"The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little. There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system while preparing for its eventual demise and restoration project. If nothing else, at least it may slow down the police state and the pseudo-empire."

How can, participation in a fake political process that has been empirically proved POWERLESS, except to give political cover to the illegitimate government created by coup d'etat, "slow down the police state"?  Public outcry, massive protest, resistance, civil dis-obedience and revolt can slow it down, but participating IN its psycho-political tools, CANNOT. The entire political party system in the U.S. is FAKE, a mere psycho-political tool to make you think and feel YOU are responsible for your own enslavement.

Do you see the cognitive dissonance?
One: A coup has occurred, he admits.
He did not plan it.
He did not give the conspirators permission for the coup.
In fact it happened WITHOUT his knowledge.
He can only reluctantly view it post-event.
Yet he says, "The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little. There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system while preparing for its eventual demise and restoration project. If nothing else, at least it may slow down the police state and the pseudo-empire"

"The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little."
So a coup cannot happen without the consent of the governed?
Cognitive Dissonant statement: (1) If a change of government happened by the consent of the governed it would be a "democratic process" OR Legitimate Revolution, like the American Revolution or the recent Egyptian Revolution, and not a Coup d'etat.
(2) The difference between a Coup and a legitimate Revolution IS by the "consent of the governed."
"There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system"
(3) If it is a system constructed by a coup, it is illegitimate and participating in its processes EMPOWERS IT.  One can only CONQUER a illegitimate Totalitarian System by forcing it to collapse.

Even the simple statement "police state" and "pseudo-empire" used together expresses cognitive dissonance. It is indeed a police state, but it is most certainly not a "pseudo-empire." It is Empire Indeed, wrecking havoc all over the globe. If the Anglo-American New World Order is not an Empire, the word "super-power" had no meaning, and Rome and Persia must have been small villages.

If you can understand that Cognitive Dissonance is the product of hypnotic conditioning - ie, Psycho-Political conditioning in this case, then this conversation will be interesting and make sense to you.  If not suspend disbelief long enough to truly entertain the historical veracity of what each person contributes.




STUNNING THIRD AUTOPSY!

According to an unusual third autopsy, it has been determined that the pachyderm that was once the Republican Party is still a dead rhinocerotoidea.

LikeLike ·  · Stop Notifications · Share
  • Arleen Harnois and 19 others like this.
  • Rex Christi I won't let them have peace. 
  • Dee Saddler I knew you were in there somewhere, Rex!
  • Arleen Harnois The body has already been embalmed, should be an interesting autopsy.
  • Piano Butch Robinson I wish it were dead, and not the second lung of the very much alive New World Order Monster that destroyed our Republic.
    16 hrs · Like · 2
  • Rex Christi I meant it was dead as far as it being the Republican Party as a somewhat conservative opposition to the Democrat-Socialists, which they purport to be in their platform. That Party is dead, has been dead and unless it is taken over by actual conservatives shall remain dead. Unfortunately, the Globalist Super State is very much alive - but, it can still be killed.
    14 hrs · Like
  • Piano Butch Robinson Trust me when I tell you that the Republican Party will never life a weapons against the GSS.
    13 hrs · Like
  • Rex Christi Perhaps, but we can't know tomorrow today and it seems easier to takeover an existing structure than to elevate another (although both can be done concurrently.)

    With the current state of the average American citizen, a revolution (restorative) within the form seems more likely than an overthrow.
    1 hr · Like
  • Piano Butch Robinson Rex, as we have previously established, your statements fall within a false paradigm. That false paradigm says (1) a coup d'etat has not already happened, (2) that it wasn't constructed and aided by both the Republican and Democrat Parties, in cooperation with the real governing power, which is the world Oligarchy.(3) It says that there are meaning grassroots democratic process in the parties that are not subverted and voided at the national level. (4) That the people have a voice and power to speak INSIDE the present system. 

    Even Princeton University in their many years study of American Public Politics, just released, has proved that the will of the people in the last forty years has been expressed NOT ONCE (their language 'to a degree so little as to not be measurable). At present the Totalitarian State has redoubled their political Kabuki Play to make you think there is a functioning Republic with REAL processes inside it. The Goudy show hearing for example, when 15 of the crucial eye witnesses have been KILLED. It is not only not functioning, it is false, a fraud, pure manipulation wizardry - 100% psycho-political manipulation. 

    EVERYTHING you do, EVERYTHING REAL or false opposition does inside this system serves no purpose OTHER THAN to give psycho-political cover for the illegitimate government. And until people like you GET IT. America is without hope. 
    http://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/.../american...


    lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com
  • Rex Christi I don't doubt that a practical coup has already occurred. Nor do I doubt that it was perpetrated by both national parties and that the grassroots are persistently subverted.

    What I do doubt is that the American people at large are in any way shape or
     form prepared for an armed revolt, much less one with a reasonable chance of success.

    The problem with either/or thinking is that it eliminates the opportunities of multiple strategies. We are far less responsible for that which will occur than we are for the correctness of our present actions.

    The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little. There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system while preparing for its eventual demise and restoration project. If nothing else, at least it may slow down the police state and the pseudo-empire.
  • Piano Butch Robinson Your immediate reference to "an armed revolt" is really ridiculous when the vast majority of Americans do not have a clue there has been a revolution, much less the capacity to comprehend that it has been a capitalist/marxist revolution, wiping out ALL democratic processes. If they had a clue they would not be as you, still using the same hammer to drive the same nail, when the object they are trying to build has obliterated. So by default you are right, the American public is not ready for an armed revolt, and that should surprise no one, since you prove even the ones claiming to be wake, are not even ready to view reality. Much less revolt. Why? Because they are conditioned to a false reality. 

    You spend hours every week conversing in that false reality, and even you can't grasp that your only accomplishment is to play into the hands of your slavers, giving them COVER, under the FAKE political system to which you are addicted. 

    It is mass hypnosis Rex, a psycho-political meme, with NO underlying reality. I am reminded of the gag I used to play showing how hypnotically suggestible people really are. In a crowd I would point to something obscure in the distance and ask, "What the hell is that?" Then in a matter of moments I would have the crowd seeing exactly what I wanted them to see, and all of them would have sworn on a stack of bibles they were actually seeing it. You are a "pointer" and every time you point to the FAKE political process as a true means of change, you give it reality in the site of those with whom you share a common delusion. A delusion Proved and RE-PROVED again and again to be delusion. The Princeton study being just the latest example.

    What's more NONE of this is a surprise. A lot of people sacrificed EVERYTHING to tell the true you continue to ignore.



    • Rex Christi Gee, Piano Butch, I wish Chris and I were as effective as you are at convincing people of the problems, but alas I lack your eloquence and oratory. It must be very empowering to know with absolute certainty not only exactly what went wrong, but precisely what to do about it (I obviously lack the comprehension because I haven't grasped your solution as of yet.) 

      I'm just a dumb sheep that thinks more people need to be aware of the problem and do all that we can to restore a Republic.
    • Rick Smith Wow. Compared to pianoman? Rex? You are positively sane! So Piano? Besides declaring all is lost.... do you have any hope? Any plan? Any faith in humanity at all?
    • Piano Butch Robinson These last two entries are actually lies. Rex, your assessment of what I'm saying, and Rick's assessment hold more lie than truth. I DO know how our Republic was taken down, because I have researched it, watched it, like a slow motion nightmare for more than fifty year. 

      You both are in the "bargaining" stage of SHOCK. What you KNOW in your gut, if even you do not yet know it in your intellect, is that everything has fundamentally changed in America. To change it back you want a "quick fix." And the fact is we cannot begin to "fix it" until we identify and thoroughly understand the manner and nature of the fundamental change. Those who are ignorant of their own history are CERTAINLY bound to repeat its same mistakes, over and over, and over. Trust me, without a real awakening, on your part, before 2016 you will both be telling me how I need to "suck it up, hold my nose and vote for the lesser of two evils." 

      When either of you disprove an EVENT, factually related in this article, then I will reassess and believe your participation in a fake political system has merit. 
      http://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/.../the-ghost-of...

Google in their "Infinite Wisdom" just returned my Letters from the Gulag Blog - after four years.

 https://rumble.com/v73cowk-the-endtime-shite-show-pt-3-the-shakhanah-glorification-of-erika-kirk.html