This conversation reflects the depth of the damage of the MIND WAR and people endlessly repeat the same processes expecting different result. Rex Christi, someone I believe to be sincere and truly concerned for his nation demonstrates "Cognitive Dissonance" which he substitutes for reason. Like I say, I believe him to be sincere, a bright young articulate, libertarian leaning conservative Roman Catholic, yet Cognitive Dissonance is the closest he can come to reason.
Let us jump ahead to the cognitive dissonance part. You know that cognitive dissonance is thorough belief in two truths, or sets of truth, each destroying the reality of the other.
Here is where Rex expresses cognitive dissonance. "I don't doubt that a practical coup has already occurred. Nor do I doubt that it was perpetrated by both national parties and that the grassroots are persistently subverted."
"The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little. There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system while preparing for its eventual demise and restoration project. If nothing else, at least it may slow down the police state and the pseudo-empire."
How can, participation in a fake political process that has been empirically proved POWERLESS, except to give political cover to the illegitimate government created by coup d'etat, "slow down the police state"? Public outcry, massive protest, resistance, civil dis-obedience and revolt can slow it down, but participating IN its psycho-political tools, CANNOT. The entire political party system in the U.S. is FAKE, a mere psycho-political tool to make you think and feel YOU are responsible for your own enslavement.
Do you see the cognitive dissonance?
One: A coup has occurred, he admits.
He did not plan it.
He did not give the conspirators permission for the coup.
In fact it happened WITHOUT his knowledge.
He can only reluctantly view it post-event.
Yet he says, "The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little. There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system while preparing for its eventual demise and restoration project. If nothing else, at least it may slow down the police state and the pseudo-empire"
"The coup can only occur so long as we give it consent, whether active or passive matters little."
So a coup cannot happen without the consent of the governed?
Cognitive Dissonant statement: (1) If a change of government happened by the consent of the governed it would be a "democratic process" OR Legitimate Revolution, like the American Revolution or the recent Egyptian Revolution, and not a Coup d'etat.
(2) The difference between a Coup and a legitimate Revolution IS by the "consent of the governed."
"There is no reason to give up trying to take over the existing system"
(3) If it is a system constructed by a coup, it is illegitimate and participating in its processes EMPOWERS IT. One can only CONQUER a illegitimate Totalitarian System by forcing it to collapse.
Even the simple statement "police state" and "pseudo-empire" used together expresses cognitive dissonance. It is indeed a police state, but it is most certainly not a "pseudo-empire." It is Empire Indeed, wrecking havoc all over the globe. If the Anglo-American New World Order is not an Empire, the word "super-power" had no meaning, and Rome and Persia must have been small villages.
If you can understand that Cognitive Dissonance is the product of hypnotic conditioning - ie, Psycho-Political conditioning in this case, then this conversation will be interesting and make sense to you. If not suspend disbelief long enough to truly entertain the historical veracity of what each person contributes.
STUNNING THIRD AUTOPSY!
According to an unusual third autopsy, it has been determined that the pachyderm that was once the Republican Party is still a dead rhinocerotoidea.