Two
years ago, America inaugurated the American Nationalist, Donald J
Trump, as President of the United States despite incredible odds, and
the opposition has only gotten worse since. The globalist shadow
government, their apparatchiks and fellow travelers have been sending
everything they’ve got against him to stop the America First movement to
claim national sovereignty. Yet, he takes all of these slings and
arrows, gladly for you and with his Steel Will he stands against all the
enemies of the people. From the Deep State bureaucrats to the Deep
State fake news media; from the Party of Crime, the Democrats, to the
Party of Slime, the Republicans; from foreign frenemies to extracting
trading partners; from globalist agreements that tie us up to domestic
terrorists who ruin the remnant of our culture; our Super President
takes them all on and wins! His will is unstoppable; how’s yours? Are
you prepared for the most winning you’ve ever seen; while experiencing
the most danger you have ever experienced? Your mission is to follow
President Trump and Make America Great Again!
Politics is about
one thing and one thing only: POWER! Trump has the power. The idiots
that killed the Republic and brought us into Empire NEVER expected
Trump....he is the Emperor they never wanted.
The globalists’
shadow government is in panic as Trump is about to reveal their crimes.
He must be stopped at all costs; the American Nationalist Giant must
never be aware of how numerous her members are, nor how weak the
globalist controlling oligarchy is. We are in a state of emergency, we
are about to weather the Storm, stand together as the sky falls.
If you fail, if you lose focus, if you get distracted, if you attack
laterally, if you fight the last war, if you pick the wrong battle, you
are not helping, you are hindering and that makes you more dangerous
than the enemy. FOCUS UP. Don't get too Qurious. Drop your ideological
pretension. Realize that you are one among many and we hold the line
together, we advance together, we crush the enemy together...as ONE.
Petty bullshit is more dangerous than the opposition. Seek not friends
nor fellow travelers; as Americans, as soldiers of Trump, we are One.
Where we go one, we go all. Phalanx.
Our enemy is not a foreign
nation-state; our enemy has no state, but controls aspects of most
states including governments within our union.
In the storm,
right the ship; where we go one, we go all; for good or for ill. We are
witnessing a centuries-long war in its final phases, and this time we
are winning. Dialectical choices in the age of Trump will leave you
behind, we need a whole new thinking. Every empire either conquers or
collapses. The president is conquering the world and preventing the
collapse of the American Empire…what will that empire be?
There is no Republican Party; There is a Trump Party – John Boehner
Disloyal R's are far more difficult than Crooked Hillary. They come at
you from all sides. They don’t know how to win - I will teach them! -
President Trump
Americans finally have a champion to lead for
America First while deconstructing the Enemedia, Marxists and the nearly
defunct New World Order globalists. Victory is ours, but only if we
never let up. Ladies and gentlemen, we are still at WAR.
+++
+++
Monday, January 21, 2019
Sunday, January 20, 2019
The Terrorism against the Orthodox Faithful in Ukraine Begins
I have stated on all my platforms that the CIA's takeover of the "Nationalist Ukrainian Orthodox Church" would quickly escalate into the persecuation of the Faithful Orthodox, and soon faithful priests will be martyred in the streets.
+++
Incase you doubt my assessment these two paragraphs should send shock through your psyche. Ask yourself, why would the Jews of Israel and the U.S. be pressuring the Orthodox of Jerusalem to participate in their own attack on Christian Russia and her Church?
+++His Beatitude Patriarch Theophilos III of Jerusalem celebrated the great
feast of Theophany today in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in
Jerusalem. Notably, he did not concelebrate with any representatives
from the Ukrainian schismatic church.
OrthoChristian reported on January 11
<http://orthochristian.com/118545.html> that His Beatitude and the
Jerusalem Patriarchate were under heavy pressure from the Patriarchate
of Constantinople and the states of Israel and the U.S. to recognize and
concelebrate with representatives of the schismatic group created by
Constantinople on December 15 <http://orthochristian.com/117934.html> in
Kiev and given a tomos of autocephaly on January 6
<http://orthochristian.com/118451.html> in Istanbul. Though the majority
of the bishops opposed such a move, it was unclear at that time what
would happen, due to the extreme pressure from several sides.
+++
Theophany services disrupted by terrorist bomb attack at Ukrainian cathedral
Sumy, Ukraine, January 19, 2019
The festive Theophany services were disrupted at the Holy
Transfiguration Cathedral of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church in
Sumy today when unknown perpetrators threw explosives at the narthex of
the church. Fortunately, no one in the crowded church was injured,
reports the Sumy Diocese website
http://portal-pravoslavie.sumy.ua/novini-eparhii/u-kafedralnomu-sobori-stavsya-vibuh.html?fbclid=IwAR2n7wYtyEamCcfb-PY_Q4i9gnWg_Sdd3H7rEK0vosSbe19EfmHMnVJvLmg.
The explosion occurred during the services. Field investigators and bomb
technicians promptly arrived on the scene.
Cathedral parishioners are inclined to believe the daring crime is a
direct consequence of aggressive rhetoric inciting religious conflict,
which is strongly supported on the official level. The inaction of the
authorities and law enforcement especially increase the risk of the
recurrence of such incidents.
The same cathedral was just vandalized with graffiti on January 15
<http://orthochristian.com/118678.html>.
In late October <http://orthochristian.com/116864.html>, the three
dioceses of the Sumy Province declared their loyalty to the canonical
Church and its primate His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and
All Ukraine: Sumy, Romny, and Konotop.
Saturday, January 19, 2019
Friday, January 18, 2019
The Golden Haired Master of the Gordian Knot
I never watch T.V. unless it is a social convention, so I read - something increasingly lost to the young - they think they read because they scan shite on the internet. That's a digression . . .
Now don't fear the Shakespeare, I'm going to interpret it for you. I was reading specifically Henry the 5th, Act 1, Scene 1 and I was literally stopped in my tracks by the words, because I had been searching for them - not remembering their origins or author, I wanted to including them in an article I wrote years ago pictured here.
I remember hearing the words of the Great Christian Apologist, Ravi Zacharias, ringing in my hears as I looked for that quote never finding it. He, in poor health and old, when asked he biggest regret he said, "not recording and cataloging quotes as I read those thousands of books. I have spent half my life searching for quotes I vague hold in my memory."
+++
+++
Shakespeare, Henry V, Act 1 Scene 1. 45–47
CANTERBURY
It would drain us dry.
ELY
ELY
ELY
But what can be done to prevent it?
CANTERBURY
The king is virtuous and kind.
And a true lover of the holy Church.
CANTERBURY
You wouldn’t have
expected it based on how he acted as a youth. But no sooner had his
father stopped breathing than the prince’s wildness died too. Really, at
that precise moment he gained a capacity for reflection, which appeared
like an angel to chase away the sinful part of him, leaving his body
like a paradise, fit to house only lofty thoughts and feelings. You
never saw anyone become serious and studious so quickly. You never saw
such a total transformation, as though a wild river, rushing through,
had swept away his faults. Such a collection of stubborn character flaws
was never banished from one place so suddenly as in the case of this
king.
ELY
We are fortunate in the change.
CANTERBURY
If you just listen to
him discuss theological matters, you’ll find yourself thinking privately
what an excellent bishop he would make. Hear him debate matters of
domestic policy, and you’d swear he had made them his constant study.
Listen to him talk about war, and you’ll hear elegant and thrilling
accounts of the battles. Bring up any political topic, and he’ll
untangle it as easily as if it were his own
garter. And the result is that when he speaks, the very air—which is
free to go where it likes—stops dead, and men stand in silent wonder,
hoping to catch the benefit of his gorgeous utterances. There must be
skill and experience behind all this abstract thought, but it’s anyone’s
guess how he obtained it, since in his youth he preferred shallow
pursuits, with uneducated, crude and superficial companions. He spent
his time drunken, overfed, and constantly seeking out entertainment,
with no inclination for learning or quiet contemplation, nor any limit
to his tolerance for public haunts and crowds.
ELY
ELY
Strawberries grow
underneath nettle plants, and berries grow best when they’re planted
next to inferior fruit. In the same way, the prince hid his serious side
under the guise of wild behavior. Just like summer grass, which grows
fastest during the night, this sober quality was able to grow and thrive
all the better for being undetected.
CANTERBURY
CANTERBURY
That must be it, because the age of miracles is passed, and we have to find reasonable explanations for why these things happen.
Turn him to any cause of policy,
The Gordian Knot of it he will unloose,
Familiar as his garter
— Shakespeare, Henry V, Act 1 Scene 1. 45–47
The Gordian Knot is a legend of Phrygian Gordium associated with Alexander the Great. It is often used as a metaphor for an intractable problem (disentangling an "impossible" knot) solved easily by finding a loophole or thinking creatively ("cutting the Gordian knot"):
We just witnessed President Donald Trump find a loophole in the nearly impossible task of reducing the size of the Federal Government, is was an act of genius.
We shouldn't be surprised, do you remember all the stale diplomats, and foreign policy experts who said that the Korean Peninsula was an intractable problem that could not be solved without years and years of tough negotiations and we had to kowtow to China and South Korea? I remember Hillary Clinton on the View, (I saw an excerpt on YouTube - I've never watched even five minutes of that center of Marxist BullShite on the view) but while Trump was threatening lil' Kim with "Fire and Fury and frankly, power like the world has never seen before" and while he was threatening China with tariffs and while in imposed tariffs on China, and while he threaten South Korea with tariffs and informed them that our trade agreement with them would most certainly be renegotiated, and while Lil' Kim was threatening Japan and launching missiles in Japanese air space, the media was hysterical that the ignorant Trump was about to create nuclear war, and BOOM Lil'Kim is at the table smiling and signing a peace treaty and promising denuclearization. A Gordian Knot bit the dust.
How about the CIA/Mossad's strangle hold on the Middle East, one trip to Saudi Arabia and all the Arab Gulf Nations together surrounded and quarantined the Mossad/CIA's ISIS Command and Supply operation in Qatar. Qatar is still under a air and sea blockade, that is the Globalist Base there neutralized. And instantly ISIS began starve and to crumble.
Another Gordian Knot, the experts said would take many years maybe decades to conquer and BOOM the Golden Haired Master of the Gordian found the weak point and history tells the rest.
People (including me) are screaming for prosecutions of the Coup Plotters, but remember they are the shallow state, the so-called Obama lefts behinds - they are not the deep state, and they certainly are not the Globalist Shadow Government, where George Soros is a Master. No, the Coup Plotters are just a little tool of the same. But . . . . Stuff is happening.
The reanimation of the systems of the REPUBLIC. Check out the investigations of John Henry Durham, the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut. Read about his track record prosecuting FBI and the MOB, is responsible for taking down the Boston Field Office of the FBI and the Boston Mob, the first U.S. attorney Trump sought out, brought out of retirement and appointed. He is again investigating the FBI, this time at its highest levels and the DOJ, same. A shield of protection provided by the Deep State, has been removed from Hillary Clinton and her crew and they are being forced to give testimony (under oath) in Judicial Watch's Benghazi related lawsuits and Jerome Corsi & Robert Klayman are going after Meuller for Obstruction of Justice and malicious prosecution in a multi-million dollar lawsuit. In the case of the civil suits, the testimony under oath creates a record that will make criminal activity, public. Legally it is like untangling a Gordian Knot, sooner or later the key link is going to be exposed and it will quickly become unraveled.
The Gordian Knot is a legend of Phrygian Gordium associated with Alexander the Great. It is often used as a metaphor for an intractable problem (disentangling an "impossible" knot) solved easily by finding a loophole or thinking creatively ("cutting the Gordian knot"):
Turn him to any cause of policy,
The Gordian Knot of it he will unloose,
Familiar as his garter
— Shakespeare, Henry V, Act 1 Scene 1. 45–47
Stuff is happening.
Wednesday, January 9, 2019
The Second Most Defamed Man on The Planet.
Without at doubt Candidate, President Elect and American President Donald Trump is the most maligned and defamed man on the planet, and second to him is Julian Assange. Julian Assange has functioned as a REAL Journalist in a era when REAL Journalism was criminalized. This week Julian Assange defended himself in a series of statements countering false claims made about him in the international press.
https://emma.best/2019/01/07/140-things-youre-not-allowed-to-say-about-assange-or-wikileaks/
+++
+++
It is clear that there is a pervasive climate of inaccurate claims about WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, including purposeful fabrications planted in otherwise 'reputable' media outlets. In several instances these fabrications appear to have the intent of creating political cover for his censorship, isolation, expulsion, arrest, extradition and imprisonment.
Mr. Assange's isolation, ongoing proceedings and pending extradition also increase the legal and ethical burden on journalists, publishers and others to get their facts straight.
Consequently journalists and publishers have a clear responsibility to carefully fact-check from primary sources and to consult the following list of defamations to ensure they do not spread and have not spread falsehoods about WikiLeaks or Julian Assange. The purpose of this list is to aid the honest and accurate and to put the dishonest and inaccurate on notice.
Defamation List v1.3
the absense of any claim from this list does not imply that the claim is not false or defamatory
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is, or has ever been, charged with an offence by the United Kingdom or Sweden [see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is, or has ever been, an agent or officer of any intelligence service [see https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks is, or has ever been alleged by the U.S. government to be, a State "foreign intelligence service".
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange has ever been contacted by the Mueller investigation.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that there is any evidence that the U.S. charges against Julian Assange relate to the Mueller investigation.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or Wikileaks is, or has ever been alleged by the U.S. government to be: Russian, Russian owned, a Russian subsidiary, contracted by Russia, Russian staffed, based in Russia, "in league" with Russia, an "arm of Russia" or a "Russian cutout" [see https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the U.S. government claims that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks directed, conspired, colluded or otherwise engaged in a crime, to obtain information from the Democratic National Committee or John Podesta [in fact, the government has made no such claim].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the Democratic National Committee has claimed that Julian Assange directed, conspired, or colluded to hack the Democratic National Committee or John Podesta [in fact, the DNC makes no such claim: https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/WikiLeaksDNC.pdf].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks was alone in publishing allegedly hacked Democratic Party materials in 2016 [in fact, most U.S. media organizations did so: Politico, the Hill, The Intercept, Facebook, Wordpress and Twitter, and every major press outlet, including CNN and the New York Times, republished, see https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/WikiLeaksDNC.pdf].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever met or communicated with Paul Manafort [see https://theintercept.com/2019/01/02/five-weeks-after-the-guardians-viral-blockbuster-assangemanafort-scoop-no-evidence-has-emerged-just-stonewalling/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever met or communicated with George Cottrell [see https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1068475150314676225].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange privately provided information about its then pending 2016 U.S. election-related publications to any outside party, including Nigel Farage, Roger Stone, Jerome Corsi, Donald Trump Jr., Michael Flynn, Michael Flynn Jr., Cambridge Analytica, or Rebecca Mercer [it is defamatory because it falsely imputes that Julian Assange acted without integrity in his role as the editor of WikiLeaks, associates with criminals, or has committed a crime].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks has ever colluded with or conspired with, or compromised the integrity of its journalism for, any political campaign or State [in fact, published communication records show WikiLeaks doing exactly the opposite: rejecting approaches by Cambridge Analytica and the Trump campaign for information on its pending publications, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange was in communication with Roger J. Stone during, or prior to, the U.S. 2016 presidential election [in fact, the only message sent from WikiLeaks was a demand that Mr. Stone cease falsely stating that he had "communicated" with Julian Assange].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that there was a "back channel" between Julian Assange and Roger J. Stone during, or prior to, the U.S. 2016 presidential election.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Nigel Farage met with Julian Assange during, or prior to, the U.S. 2016 presidential election.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the purpose of Nigel Farage's meeting with Julian Assange in 2017, after the U.S. election, was in any way improper or not journalistic.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange timed the publication of its series on John Podesta to conceal the Access Hollywood "grab them by the pussy" video of Donald Trump [in fact, it is well documented that the video release was moved forward three days to be on the day of WikiLeaks' publication, see https://consortiumnews.com/2018/07/19/inside-wikileaks-working-with-the-publisher-that-changed-the-world/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is "anti-American" or "anti-U.S." [in fact, he has an abiding love for the United States, see https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/julian-assange-wikileaks-has-the-same-mission-as-the-post-and-the-times/2017/04/11/23f03dd8-1d4d-11e7-a0a7-8b2a45e3dc84_story.html].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have not published critical information on Russia, Syria or Donald Trump [in fact, WikiLeaks has published hundreds of thousands of documents on Russia, millions on Syria, and thousands on Donald Trump, see https://wikileaks.org/spyfiles/russia/, https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=russia%7Cputin%7Cmoscow#results, https://wikileaks.org/syria-files/ & https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=trump#results].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever worked for, or has ever been employed by "Russia Today", "RT" or the Russian government.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange was "given a show", "made a host", or "hosted a show" on RT [in fact, in 2012, he and two British companies, Dartmouth Films and Journeyman Pictures conceived, produced and distributed "The World Tomorrow", which was licensed to a dozen broadcasters and newspapers, only one of which was RT].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks "works with RT" or "works with Russian State media" [in fact, only once, for one publication in 2012, was RT part of a consortium of nearly two dozen re-publishers of WikiLeaks' series on the private surveillance industry, the SpyFiles].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks arranged for Edward Snowden to go to Russia [in fact, WikiLeaks gave legal assistance to Mr. Snowden to obtain asylum in Ecuador, but the U.S. government cancelled Mr. Snowden's passport mid-flight, stranding him in a Moscow transit lounge for 40 days [see https://edwardsnowden.com/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange applied for a Russian visa in 2010 or obtained a Russian visa in the year 2010 or subsequently.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that there was a "Russian plan" to "smuggle", or to otherwise remove, Julian Assange from the Ecuadorian embassy in London or that Fidel Narvaez, or anyone else, was in contact with the Russian embassy in London in relation to such a claimed plan [see https://therealnews.com/stories/ecuadorian-ex-diplomat-report-claiming-assange-met-manafort-is-false].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange was made an Ecuadorian diplomat to Russia [in fact, his diplomatic credentials were lodged to the government of the United Kingdom and he was appointed as an Ecuadorian diplomat to the United Kingdom; at no point were they lodged with Russia].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange claimed that any person or entity was their source for WikiLeaks' 2016 U.S. election publications [it is defamatory because Julian Assange's professional reputation is substantially based on source protection].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks does not have a perfect record of accurately verifying its publications.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the U.S. government has ever denied the authenticity of a WikiLeaks publication.
It is false and defamatory to deny that DNC Chair Donna Brazile and Senator Elizabeth Warren admitted that Julian Assange was, in fact, correct and that the DNC had indeed "rigged" the 2016 primary election in favour of Hillary Clinton [see https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/926250463594516480 and https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/926094515261378561].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that John Podesta or Donna Brazile deny the authenticity of emails about them published by WikiLeaks [in fact, Brazile confessed that WikiLeaks was correct and she had indeed shared debate questions with the Hillary Clinton campaign https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/843216277225308161].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the French government found that "MacronLeaks" were hacked by Russia [in fact, the head of the French cyber-security agency, ANSSI, said that they did not have evidence connecting the hack with Russia, see https://wikileaks.org/macron-emails/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks "targetted" the French presidential election of 2017 and published "MacronLeaks" during that election [in fact, WikiLeaks published MacronLeaks after the election].
It is false and defamatory to suggest any of the MacronLeaks published by WikiLeaks are inauthentic or that President Macron attempted to make such a claim after the publication by WikiLeaks.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks has ever stated that Russia was not behind the attempted murder of former Russian spy Sergei Skripal [in fact, Julian Assange stated that it was "reasonable" to view Russia as "the leading suspect"].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks has ever stated it was not appropriate to expel Russian diplomats and spies over the attempted murder of Sergei Skripal.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Ecuador isolated and gagged Mr. Assange due to his comments on Sergei Skripal [in fact, he was isolated over his refusal to delete a factually accurate tweet about the arrest of the president of Catalonia by Spain in Germany, along with U.S. debt pressure on Ecuador. The president of Ecuador Lenin Moreno admitted that these two countries were the issue, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange does not have political asylum or is merely "seeking asylum" [in fact, he won his asylum case in relation to U.S. government moves to prosecute him on August 16, 2012 and was granted formal refugee status under the 1951 Refugee Convention, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange "fled" to the Embassy of Ecuador [in fact, he walked into the embassy and lodged an asylum claim; it was not until 10 days later that the UK government issued a warrant for his arrest. see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is, or has been, "hiding" in the embassy [in fact, his location is well known and his formal legal status is "political refugee"; it is incorrect to suggest that refugees, by virtue of being in the jurisdiction of refuge, are "hiding"].
It is false and defamatory to deny that Julian Assange has been formally investigated since 2010 and charged by the U.S. federal government over his publishing work [it is defamatory because such a claim falsely imputes that Mr. Assange's asylum is a sham and that he is a liar, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
- It is false and defamatory to suggest that such U.S. charges have not been confirmed [in fact, they have, most recently by Associated Press (AP) and the Washington Post in November 2018].
- It is false and defamatory to suggest that the U.S. government denies the existence of such charges.
- It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is not wanted for extradition by the U.S. government [in fact, public records from the Department of Justice show that the U.S. government says it had been intentionally concealing its charges against Mr. Assange from the public specifically to decrease his ability to "avoid arrest and extradition"].
- It is false and defamatory to suggest that the U.S. government has not publicly confirmed that it has an active grand jury, or pending or prospective proceedings, against Julian Assange or WikiLeaks, each year since 2010.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange's asylum is "self-imposed" or that he is "free to walk out any time he likes" [in fact, the UK government states that he will be immediately arrested, the U.S. government seeks his extradition and the exits to the embassy are under 24-hour surveillance; it is self-evident that refugees, having been compelled by the risk of persecution to seek asylum are not "free" to return to the area of risk, any more than one is free to leave a house with a bear on the porch, see https://defend.wikileaks.org].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange applied for political asylum over "sex allegations" or "extradition to Sweden" or to "avoid questioning" [in fact, he formally applied for and received political asylum over the U.S. grand jury proceedings against him; the UN and the Swedish courts found that Sweden was improperly refusing to question him, not the other way around, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is merely a "guest" of the embassy and does not have refugee status, including under the 1951 Refugee Convention, or that the UK is not a party to the Convention, or that Julian Assange received only "diplomatic asylum" or that his refugee status is, in any sense, improper or incomplete [it is defamatory because it suggests that Julian Assange committed a crime by applying for asylum, which is false, see https://defned.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange, as a political refugee, does not have the right to voice his political opinions or a right to communicate them [it is defamatory because it falsely suggests Mr. Assange is a liar when he states he has never agreed to be gagged and when he asserts that it is a fact that refugees have the legal right to express political opinions and because his reputation is to a significant degree based on the accuracy of his statements and in being the world's best-known free speech proponent and practitioner].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange did not have the right to apply for asylum or committed an offence in doing so [in fact, he has not been charged with an offence in the UK at any time and a "reasonable excuse" is a complete defence against any hypothetical future charge of "failing to surrender" under UK law and there has been no legal finding that his defence is invalid, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the terminated Swedish preliminary investigation started prior to the U.S. grand jury proceedings [in fact, the U.S. grand jury proceedings started in June 2010, three months before the Swedish preliminary investigation].
It is false and defmatory to suggest that the dropped Swedish preliminary investigation against Julian Assange ever had any legitimacy whatsoever [in fact, already by August 2010, the Chief Prosecutor of Stockholm found that "no crime at all" had been committed, and SMS messages from the alleged complainant showed that she "did not want to accuse Assange of anything", that she felt "railroaded by police and others around her", and that "police made up the charges"; documents from the UK government prove serious impropriety by the State, and the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UN WGAD)found Sweden's conduct to be illegal, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and potentially defamatory to suggest that the UN WGAD decision finding Julian Assange to be unlawfully detained in the UK is not legally binding [in fact, the UN has released two statements in response to such false reporting, stating that the decision is "legally binding" https://twitter.com/UN_SPExperts/status/1076107846629158914].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever been charged with, or committed, an offence in the United Kingdom.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever "breached his bail", "jumped bail", absconded, fled an arrest warrant, or that he has ever been charged with such at any time.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has a sentence to serve or has ever avoided serving a sentence.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange fled Sweden [in fact, the State prosecutor granted him permission to leave, he was not wanted for arrest or charged with an offence at the time he left Sweden, and he left for a publicly scheduled talk in Geneva, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has been accused by any person of raping them [in fact, both so-called Swedish "complainants", who were falsely reported to have made such an accusation, denied that they had been raped, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the Swedish preliminary investigation was closed due to an inability to proceed caused by Mr. Assange or a statute of limitations [in fact, the prosecution abandoned the entire preliminary investigation, the arrest warrant was dropped, and the file closed and destroyed as the direct result of Julian Assange filing a case against the government of Sweden for its abuse of legal due process; the UN WGAD also twice found that Sweden had acted unlawfully, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange was never interviewed by Swedish officials or has ever attempted to avoid being interviewed by Swedish officials [see https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that there was ever a charge, case or prosecution against Julian Assange in Sweden [in fact, the matter never reached beyond the "preliminary investigation" stage].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is false and defamatory to deny that WikiLeaks is a media organization [in fact, WikiLeaks has won many media awards, is registered as a media organization, has been repeatedly found to be a "media organization" by the UK courts, and employs top journalists who (including Julian Assange) are members of their respective media unions, see https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to deny that Julian Assange is an award-winning editor, journalist, publisher, author and documentary maker who has won the highest journalism award in his country, among many others. [https://defend.wikileaks.org/about-julian/]
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks has ever, through intent or negligence, revealed a source [in fact, in the case of alleged source Chelsea Manning, the allegation by the State is that Manning spoke, in a knowing breach of WikiLeaks' security rules, to a reseacher for Wired magazine, Adrian Lamo, who promised him journalistic confidentiality, only to then inform on him to the FBI].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks is a "group", that it has "members" or that Julian Assange is a "member" of WikiLeaks [in fact, WikiLeaks is a publication and a publishing organization; it has a highly accomplished salaried staff, not members; it is not al-Qaeda].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks has ever directed, conspired, or colluded in a criminal manner with its sources.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange claimed "informants deserve to die" [in fact, Der Spiegel signed a statement refuting a false claim that he did, see https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/762711823216996352].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange has asserted that the Syrian government did not conduct chemical attacks during the war in Syria [in fact, WikiLeaks has published millions of documents from the Syrian government, including Bashar al-Assad's personal emails https://wikileaks.org/syria-files/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks publications have caused deaths [in fact, the Pentagon's General Robert Carr, who was assigned to look at their impact, admitted under oath in the trial of Chelsea Manning that the U.S. government had not been able to find any such incidents].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange or WikiLeaks recklessly published unredacted U.S. diplomatic cables [see https://wikileaks.org/Guardian-journalist-negligently.html].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that any of WikiLeaks' claims about its 2017 CIA leak, Vault 7, "were later retracted" [the series had no retractions].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange ever published millions of records about female voters in Turkey [see https://wikileaks.org/10years/distorted-facts.html].
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is not an Australian citizen.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a "hacker".
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange was charged with an offence at any time by Bermuda.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever extorted the United States government.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange filed a lawsuit against Ecuador over trivialities [in fact, he filed an injunction to force the state to cease illegally gagging and isolating him since March 28, 2018 and moving to void his asylum after his publication of the largest leak in CIA history. Contrary to false reports, his cat hasn't even been at embassy since well before the inunction was filed, see https://justice4assange.com/Protection-Action.html and https://defend.wikileaks.org/].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever neglected an animal or has ever been asked by a state to take "better care" of an animal [see https://justice4assange.com/Protection-Action.html].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever called to overthrow the Spanish state by calling for the independence of Catalonia [in fact, he never called for the independence of Catalonia].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange's reporting on the violence and censorship inflicted against Catalans in any way connected to Russia [in fact, the managing editor of El Pais, David Alandete, was fired for spreading this false claim].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the Catalan government, or any other entity, paid Julian Assange to report on the violence and censorship inflicted against Spain's Catalan minority, or to otherwise support their right to self-determination [in fact, Spanish prosecutors confirmed that there were no records of Mr. Assange receiving such payments contrary to what had been falsely reported].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is "far right".
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a racist.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a paedophile.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a rapist.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a murderer.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever proposed that he not publish, censor or delay a publication in exchange for any thing.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever agreed to do anything or to not do anything as a condition of his asylum.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that the administration of President Rafael Correa imposed any conditions in exchange for his refugee status or asylum.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange is a criminal or has a criminal record [in fact, his convictions for offences as a teenager in Australia have been expunged].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange called the Panama Papers "a Soros-funded attack against Putin" [see https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/717810984673484800].
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange has ever published, uttered or tried to promote a "conspiracy theory".
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks or Julian Assange has ever suppressed materials critical of Israel, Russia or any other State.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that WikiLeaks possessed unpublished leaked material on the Trump campaign or the GOP or Russia and surpressed it.
It is false and defamatory to suggest that Julian Assange has ever hacked the state of Ecuador.
Friday, January 4, 2019
Bond Go Round the Psyop
Trump wants to build a border wall and
the left thinks they can prevent him with a shit-storm wall of
propaganda. The last three years have been the most amazing exercise
of psyops madness, and pure madness exhibited in the demonic display
of professional liars and madmen and insane women parading in pussy
hats and otherwise inappropriately dressed screaming the screams of
demons. What is happening is a National Exorcism and we are at the
stage that the demons are SCREAMING in protest to being exposed and
examined, reluctantly volunteering their names out of torment. They
are as pathetic as the proverbial vampire faced with a Christian
Cross.
+++
+++
+++
Las Vegas Information https://www.bitchute.com/video/AiOV5A... Support This Channel https://www.patreon.com/BondRobin PO Box 1174 Hartwell, Georgia 30643 Friends of Bond Robin Donation Page https://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/2018/07/friends-of-bond-robin-donation-page.html PO Box 1174 Hartwell, Georgia 30643
Las Vegas Information https://www.bitchute.com/video/AiOV5A... Support This Channel https://www.patreon.com/BondRobin PO Box 1174 Hartwell, Georgia 30643 Friends of Bond Robin Donation Page https://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/2018/07/friends-of-bond-robin-donation-page.html PO Box 1174 Hartwell, Georgia 30643
Monday, December 31, 2018
Laura Loomer Uncovers Court Docs That Blows the Lid Off Vegas Massacre's Official Story
Mirror From:
mfamediagroup.com
mfamediagroup.com
Laura Loomer Uncovers Court Docs That Blows The Lid Off Vegas Massacre’s Official Story
MFA Media Group
Laura Loomer
is a conservative investigative journalist and activist. Originally
from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover journalist
for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. 
She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications.
She covers politics, anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West, and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as many international publications.
Documents
released on Thursday from the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
LVMPD point to multiple shooters and a contaminated crime scene in an
already controversial investigation into the Las Vegas shooting over a
year ago.
The LVMPD released 18 voluntary statements made
by officers who responded to the shooting in Las Vegas on October 1,
2017. One of the documents that stood out from the rest was the sworn
statement of Sergeant William Matchko (P#8525), document #11, in which
he states the LVMPD knew of multiple shooters who they planned to
wiretap after they discovered Stephen Paddock’s dead body in a suspected
suicide.
In what is a routine procedure, officers are
often asked to give a statement very soon after an event, commonly
referred to as a witness officer interview. Matchko’s interview was
conducted by the LVMPD – Force Investigation Team on October 3, 2017,
at 6:40 PM, just two days after the Las Vegas shooting.
Matchko
got to Mandalay Bay shortly after the shooting had stopped but joined
the teams who eventually made their way into the room over an hour after
the last shots were fired. Before the breach of room 32-135 at the
Mandalay Bay hotel, the reported location where the shooting reportedly
took place, he was overlooking the men who were making their way down
the 100 wings towards 32-135.
In Sergeant Matchko’s
statement, he described how upon entering room 32-135, he immediately
realized that alleged Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock had been dead for a
long time prior to SWAT entering the room.
“So I go in there. Um, and I could see the suspect laying on the ground and the blood had started to, ah– started to coagulate by his head. So it appears that based on the time I didn’t–there–I didn’t think it– it looked like there was no way that the gunshots that we did from the time frame based on the blood coagulating like they shot him. You know, when I looked at him I immediately thought to myself this guy has been dead for more than the time we’ve been in this room.”
On
January 30, 2018, a series of police search warrant documents regarding
the Las Vegas shooting were unsealed by a Nevada judge. One of the
documents unsealed details a search warrant request from 3:02 a.m. on
Oct. 2, in which Sergeant Jerry MacDonald, the sergeant who sought the
search warrant and also helped author the preliminary investigative
report, said officers witnessed Paddock kill himself.
“As SWAT officers breached room 135, they observed Stephen Paddock place a gun to his head and fire one round.”
MacDonald’s statement in that initial warrant request was the first warrant request he authored after the Vegas shooting.
However,
According to an investigative report released by LVMPD on Jan. 19, the
10-minute shooting spree ended at 10:18 p.m. on Oct. 1.
At
11:20 p.m., LVMPD SWAT and members of the Strike team entered room
32-135 and *found* Paddock dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
Not
only does Sergeant Matchko’s statement directly contradict LVMPD
Sheriff Joe Lombardo’s claim that Paddock killed himself just moments
before SWAT entered the suite at Mandalay Bay, but it also contradicts
claims made by Sergeant Jerry MacDonald, in which he stated that
officers witnessed Paddock commit suicide.
On that
night, police say Paddock, 64, opened fire from his 32nd-floor suite at
the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino onto a crowd gathered at a country
music festival, killing 58 people and injuring over 800 more. LVMPD and
the FBI have still not provided a motive for the shooting, remaining
adamant that Paddock was a “lone wolf”.
Further
examination of Sergeant Matchko’s statement also challenges claims made
by Lombardo and the FBI that Paddock was a lone wolf shooter.
Matchko
stated and emphasized that “there’s a million other active shooters” at
the time officers found Paddock’s dead body inside suite 32-135 at the
Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino.
“They go in, they say, “We’re gonna blow this other door.” “Um, as they walk into the room, mind you on the radio there’s a million other active shooters being called out in all these other hotels. They put the second charge on the door. Um, they blow the door. As soon as that I hear the second explosion now the fire alarm goes off again and I hear the (unintelligible). I hear the what sound like a burst fire but it was very muffled. So it sounded like two or three rounds went off. And I’m – I’m down there I’m trying to make my way through the room I’m like, okay, I was like, “Did the suspect shoot at us? Did we shoot the suspect, are we in a gunfight, what’s going on,” and they were all pretty calm. So they all seemed a little bit like embarrassed. And I guess one of – O’Donnell or one of them had a negligent or accidental discharge I don’t know what the proper term would be.”
Matchko ‘s statement continues:
“Look, you guys are gonna stay here with me. We’re gonna work on Intel gathering and we’re gonna work on, you know, preserve this crime scene.” And I told the rest of the guys to get your shit and go to the New York New York ’cause the New York New York had two active shooters called in at the same time at that very moment.”
The night of the shooting, Matchko received a call from Captain Tomiano who he says told him:
“Hey, you need to go in there and you need to be looking for his (Paddock’s) ID and look for anything that we can get to gather intelligence under exigent circumstances to prevent the rest of these shooters. We need to figure out who the rest of these shooters are because we’re gonna try to go up on wiretaps on the phones.” So he’s like, “Go in there, get any phones that you can. Get the phone numbers off of ’em and start figuring it out.” He radios back “Look, well I don’t know if he has his phone on him, I’m gonna have to move him,” and they’re like, “Well you gotta move him, you gotta look for the phone, you gotta find it.””
Not only does Matchko’s
statement mention that there were multiple shooters, but his statement
also recalls an order from Captain Tomiano who told him they needed to
“prevent the rest of these shooters. We need to figure out who the rest
of these shooters are” because the LVMPD wanted to put “wiretaps on the
phones”.
Along with numerous statements about multiple
shooters, Matchko’s statement also confirms LVMPD officers intentionally
tampered with the initial crime scene upon entering room 32-135, with
orders from Captain Tomiano to move Paddock’s body.
“And then we found his main phone – well, no, we – we rolled him – so I grabbed him by the arm. I picked the suspect up on his side. The blood came out of his mouth when out next to his face.” “I rolled him back he was obviously dead ’cause he had a bullet in his head. So I put him back down, he went back in the same position but now the blood on the side of his face is from me rolling him. Um, he had nothing on him.”
Matchko’s
statement suggests Paddock had no blood on his face before Matchko
touched him. Is this also when the blood fell onto Paddock’s shirt
making it appear as though he was shot in the chest? There is no mention
of any of this in the preliminary or final FIT reports released by LVMPD,
which begs the question, what other pertinent crime scene information
or details pertaining to the shooting was left out of the LVMPD report?
The
official narrative is given by the LVMPD and the FBI for the night of
the shooting has not wavered for over a year. Along with insisting
Paddock was the only shooter, authorities also have refrained from
identifying this crime as an act of terrorism (despite the fact that ISIS has claimed responsibility for the Vegas shooting),
and they have refused to elaborate on the many officer statements and
call logs that show Paddock was not alone in the room and reports of
active shooters were called in after Paddock’s alleged suicide.
Sheriff
Lombardo of the LVMPD has refused to give further interviews or press
conferences related to the event or address the new information released
under the court order, which continues to be released but unreported.
Lombardo
has also issued a ban on department employees speaking to the press
about the new information. This ban prevents members of the media or the
public from confirming any steps taken that may explain some of the
discrepancies between the official police timeline and the new
information in the documents.
Sheriff Lombardo was challenged on the initial timeline at a live press conference based on evidence to support an earlier check-in date of September 25, 2017,
and only then after being confronted on live TV did he provide the
correct details. Over one year later and similarly, new information that
proves Lombardo misinformed the public in the aftermath of the shooting
continues to be released.
Despite being banned from
the LVMPD press conferences by Lombardo’s orders, investigative
journalist Laura Loomer continues to challenge the official narrative
and timeline of the Vegas shooting. So far the document dump, reported
on exclusively by Loomer, showed the alleged gunman, Stephen Paddock, warned an Uber driver of a “terrorist attack” at the Mandalay Bay days before the shooting, his bank account had been frozen due to suspicions of funding terrorism, three other women were registered to his hotel room, Mandalay Bay security stated in a call that there were multiple shooters, and Paddock’s girlfriend had ISIS connections on Facebook.
It’s
been over a year since the Las Vegas shooting and we still have no
answers and are seeing almost zero media coverage about the Las Vegas
shooting, the worst mass shooting in US history. Despite being the worst
mass shooting in U.S. history, the American public has received little
to no information regarding how an alleged lone gunman amassed an
arsenal of weaponry, ammunition, and equipment without detection or
help, and what motivated the act of mass murder.
As new evidence and police documents regarding the shooting continue to be released over a year later, the mystery surrounding the shooting and the theories regarding multiple shooters continues to grow with statement’s like Matchko’s, which casts further doubt on whether or not Paddock truly was a lone shooter and how long he was dead before officers entered the room.
As new evidence and police documents regarding the shooting continue to be released over a year later, the mystery surrounding the shooting and the theories regarding multiple shooters continues to grow with statement’s like Matchko’s, which casts further doubt on whether or not Paddock truly was a lone shooter and how long he was dead before officers entered the room.
What else is the LVMPD hiding, and how come they
are only now releasing these shocking officer statements over a year
after the Las Vegas shooting?
LVMPD did not reply to a
request for comment regarding their sergeant’s statement about multiple
shooters and crime scene contamination.
Laura
Loomer is a conservative investigative journalist and activist.
Originally from Arizona, Laura began her career working as an undercover
journalist for Project Veritas from 2015-2017. She covers politics,
anti-Semitism, immigration, terrorism, the Islamification of the West,
and voter fraud. Loomer’s investigations have been broadcasted on every
major national mainstream media outlet in the United States, as well as
many international publications. Support Laura Loomer’s Independent
Journalism here: PayPal.me/lauraloomer
Post Views: 69,515
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
This is a cosmic war taking place on a global scale masquerading as a civil war pretending to be a democratic election. All warfare is dece...
-
But it would be stupidity and/or evil at this point in our history not to support him vigorously! Firstly why I don't like Trump. T...
-
Attention Christian Conservatives who have been fooled by Edwardo Ted Cruz. The NeoCon/CIA/Media tells you that Ted Cruz is an "outsi...
