A realistic assessment of the state of Evolutionary "Science" and the massive advancement of the technological BEAST.
The Scientific argument against Evolutionary Darwinism/Naturalism is complete. Evolution/Naturalism as a theory for the Origins of Life has been thoroughly debunked, not by religious zealots, as the argument goes but by Science asking the simple question, From Whence Comes Information?
Many of us by reason have known this for some time, in fact for the entire period that science/naturalism entered "the party of the insane," making unproved claims from thin air and passing their convoluted myth-making off as "science." Such Mind Control psychological operation is NOT science but is rather "political" and 'theological" and has never been anything more than a baseless "philosophy" with history going back to the ancient Greek Philosophers whose arguments were as simplistic and baseless as 19th and 20th century naturalist's mythology.
As a "religious zealot," as I am labelled by those who argue dead and defamed theories of evolution because I have met and serve Jesus Christ and none other and accept as self-evident the words of Saint Paul saying"
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith. For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Romans 1:16-20 (King James Version)" As a "zealot" I never bought into the idea of evolution except where it is proved and that is the ability of living beings to adapt over time, and sometimes over extremely short periods, when life becomes very easy for them, as the Russian Gray Fox experiments prove. But this adaptation is within certain parameters of "kinds" to the mandates of survival in changing environments, or ease. Removed from the necessity of survival, domesticated, cared for and feed in comfort the Gray Fox in a few generations flowered into multi-colored and even some flop eared, cute little creature full of life and curiosity. Sadly, money restraints at end of the Soviet era caused the necessity to "eliminate" hundreds of these animals because of lack of funds to feed them.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/03/taming-wild-animals/ratliff-text/2
But to the overarching thesis of "naturalism," I am very pleased to have lived long enough to see "Naturalism" disproved by positive facts of science beyond all reasonable doubt. If you doubt my word, read:
Human Devolution: A Vedic Alternative to Darwin's Theory, by Michael A. Cremo
The Devil's Delusion: ATHEISM and its SCIENTIFIC PRETENSIONS, by David Berlinski
I offer these two books first because they are from a decidedly non-Christian perspective yet both contain the wisdom of Saint Paul's quote above, to great and greater degrees and are written by a Hindu and a Secular vocally-non-religious Jew.
For the full story read:
Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution by Michael J Behe
And,
SIGNATURE IN THE CELL: DNA AND THE EVIDENCE FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN, by Stephen C. Meyer.
I have just finished these last two and I can say without doubt that ANYONE who takes an honest read of these four books will know in their gut "Naturalism" is finished, and Darwinism/Naturalism are . . . or should be relegated to the dust bin of history.
The constant argument of the Atheistic Evolutionary Movement has been that Christians are anti-intellectual and anti-science.
NOTHING is further from the truth since Modern Science is primarily a product inside the history of Christianity, and took a decidedly anti-Church turn around the period of the so-called "Enlightenment." The majority of pioneer scientists of history WERE Christian and a great many clergy to boot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Catholic_scientists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_Catholic_cleric-scientists
As history and science has now confirmed, most of what was gained by the Protestant/Enlightenment anti-church revolution was merely anti-God, anti-Science, anti-Reason, in fact a sojourn into the realm of fantasy and delusion of which the Roman Church has not been immune. Modern Science has unleashed upon the world a massive new paradigm of technology that like all tools, firearms, dynamite, nuclear power, microwave radiation, sound and light frequency weapons, is a two edge sword, able to kill and heal, and such power is now increasingly placed in the hands of those whose foundation for morality and ethics, whose appreciation for the wonder of the human person has been destroyed by their atheistic/naturalist philosophy.
One of the really major surprises in this whole five century saga (and I reference Galileo, Kepler, Newton, Darwin etc) has been that just as the actual empirical observation of REAL science has disproved them, in the vital aspects that matter to Christianity, that is as it effects the idea of mankind created in God's image, the Roman Church in the late 20th and early 21st century and even some famous Orthodox Christian voices have embraced the errors. (Most Main Line Protestants capitulated to Darwinism decades ago.) One has to wonder why? The answer is of course as already stated, these brain dead errors are "political" and "theological" to bolster a world without God, to free man from obvious moral constraints, to make man his own creator, holding in his hands his evolutionary future, without moral constraints or reference to God or God's image in mankind. Many of these same deniers of TRUE SCIENCE have as their motive the relegation of Christianity to something other than Ultimate Truth, the reduction of Christian Truth to just one competing religious mythology in a world-supermarket of religious thought. Why?
For that answer, read the books of Dr Ray Kurzweil:
"How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed"
"Transcend: Nine Steps to Living Well Forever"
"The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology"
"The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence"
Ray is Google's Chief engineer with unlimited funds to "create the singularity" where humankind will morph into the Borg of Star Trek fame, become a single interconnected mind, cybernetically connected to "all consciousness." The bastardization of the IKON of God-the human person, into something other than human. He has written honestly about how difficult it will be to tell where humanity ends, and the technological beast begins.
In case you think I am exaggerating or an "alarmist" this from Time Magazine February 10th 2011: "But Kurzweil would spend much of the rest of his career working out what his demonstration meant. Creating a work of art is one of those activities we reserve for humans and humans only. It's an act of self-expression; you're not supposed to be able to do it if you don't have a self. To see creativity, the exclusive domain of humans, usurped by a computer built by a 17-year-old is to watch a line blur that cannot be unblurred, the line between organic intelligence and artificial intelligence.
"That was Kurzweil's real secret, and back in 1965 nobody guessed it. Maybe not even him, not yet. But now, 46 years later, Kurzweil believes that we're approaching a moment when computers will become intelligent, and not just intelligent but more intelligent than humans. When that happens, humanity — our bodies, our minds, our civilization — will be completely and irreversibly transformed. He believes that this moment is not only inevitable but imminent. According to his calculations, the end of human civilization as we know it is about 35 years away."
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2048299,00.html
What can be the motivation of those using Modern Science/Technology for the ultimate goal to "eliminate human civilization"? What can it mean, but the ushering in of a period of Technological Feudalism beyond what any human could imagine or cope - a Techno-Utilitarian-Civilization supposedly with "machines in control" rendering most of humanity needless. I say "supposedly with machines in control" because this will be the lie that "machines are in control." Rather the owners of the technology will be in total control . . . in control of an enslaving technology that has been massively hidden from us, classified, militarized and removed from the normal human's experience or control . . . a technology where we are its subjects, if indeed we are allowed life at all.
You read puff-pieces in the academic and popular science press and you believe that you have a handle on the exponential increase of the power held by the elite, and truly you DO NOT. This exchange will give you a hint at how technology has been purposely removed from the average human, developed in secret, and held by the same people who presently control all of Western Civilization, the people who literally own the governments and have enslaved normal people through generational debt.
+++
Piano Butch Robinson
The level of A.I. development is Top Secret, militarized and light years ahead of what they are telling us.
Bernard Vallandingham
Is there any way to verify that the military is light years ahead, other than that it is probable?
Piano Butch Robinson
I just wrote you an answer that caused my browser to crash - no joke. So let me try it another way. History is the key and understanding of the knowledge curve, the fact that all knowledge is doubling in shorter and shorter periods of time and that 99% of that knowledge is withheld from us. We live in a 1940s world, (1940s where technological advances were already massively suppressed) here in the 21st century we are given trinkets of technology to play with, phones, computers etc, when the Corporate/Government entity has withheld nearly all advances.
If you think carefully about it, the home and life of my grandfather 1890s and the home and life of my father 1950s were light years different. But my home and the common home today is really not very different at all, from that 1940s home, except that we have these trinkets - but have to work much harder, for much longer, for less. Yet in the period of 1900 to 1950 human knowledge doubled three times. It doubled again in the 60s, was doubling then about every decade, then doubling every five years, now every 13 months. The futurists say that it will be doubling every TWELVE HOURS shortly.
NONE of this vast expansion of knowledge has been shared with us. The chart below doesn't touch the reality.
If you made all of human technological advancement from fire to steam engine technology of the 1840s a graph line three blocks long, by 1840 the line would have raised one quarter inch from the base line. However, in that decade the line took a turn upward, almost at a 90 degree angle and is now some five miles in the sky. We were and are allowed to view and use about the first two inches of that technological advancement. My God man we are still driving internal combustion automobiles, and paying enormously for energy, when the technology for free energy has been known since the 1920s - but they will kill you if you try to develop methods of using it. The KGB files briefly opened in the 1990s told the story of Viktor Schauberger's “Implosion Machine” producing light and heat, and mechanical motion, with only air and water. It was developed and used in the "flying saucers" developed by the NAZI PRIOR to WWII. Yet we are still enslaved to energy prices and driving internal combustion machines.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19283526/Implosion-The-Path-of-Natural-Energy-Victor-Schauberger
Well at least the browser didn't crash with this explanation.
+++
If you have slogged through what I have written here, you may be wondering why the excursion across the defamed "science" of Darwinism coupled with the foray into an absurd and beastly future. I hope you quickly see that the latter is based upon the former, making the only hope for mankind, a return to the Judeo/Christian Truth that man is created in God's image, not to be enslaved, bastardized, mutated, or "evoluted" into the demonic imagery of The Borg. This awareness of man's unique place in the universe of things offered by the Reality of the Creator God, who created man in his own image, is the ONLY possibility of saving mankind from HIMSELF, from his own demonic creativity, from inventing himself into obsolescence and suffering extermination or abject slavery for the benefit of the Luciferian owners and controllers of a hybrid tecno-human beast the likes of Kurzweil are creating.
What follows is a Mirror From R.T. (Russian Television) click here for the original article.
Scientists join Elon Musk & Stephen Hawking, warn of dangerous AI
RT
Hundreds of leading scientists and technologists have joined Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk in warning of the potential dangers of sophisticated artificial intelligence, signing an open letter calling for research on how to avoid harming humanity.
The open letter, drafted by the Future of Life Institute and signed by hundreds of academics and technologists, calls on the artificial intelligence science community to not only invest in research into making good decisions and plans for the future, but to also thoroughly check how those advances might affect society.
The letter’s authors recognize the remarkable successes in “speech recognition, image classification, autonomous vehicles, machine translation, legged location and question-answering systems,” and argue that it is not unfathomable that the research may lead to the eradication of disease and poverty. But they insisted that “our AI systems must do what we want them to do” and laid out research objectives that will “help maximize the societal benefit of AI.”
The document of research priorities says that future AI could potentially impact society in areas such as computer security, economics, law, and philosophy, and highlight many concerns for communities. For instance, scientists suggested that AI should be developed to analyze how workers – and their wages – would be affected if parts of the economy become automated.
They also suggested looking into various issues involving AI that need to be considered before breakthroughs are made that are considered beneficial to society: Can lethal autonomous weapons be made to comply with humanitarian law? How will AI systems be constrained over privacy rights when it comes to obtaining data from surveillance cameras, phone lines, and emails?
READ MORE: ‘Summoning the devil’: Elon Musk warns against artificial intelligence
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has repeatedly voiced concerns about artificial intelligence, saying it could be more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk and others call for research to avoid dangers of AI http://t.co/t25P2K5Dxjpic.twitter.com/eSXBHEdemN
— IndyTech (@IndyTech) January 12, 2015
“I’m increasingly inclined to think there should be some regulatory oversight maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish,” he said.
Musk has invested in companies developing AI, and he advises “to keep an eye on them.”
Additionally, a group of scholars from Oxford University wrote in a blog post last year that “when a machine is ‘wrong,' it can be wrong in a far more dramatic way, with more unpredictable outcomes, than a human could. Simple algorithms should be extremely predictable, but can make bizarre decisions in 'unusual' circumstances."
READ MORE: Stephen Hawking: Artificial Intelligence could spell end of human race
World famous physicist Stephen Hawking, who relies on a form of artificial intelligence to communicate, told the BBC that if technology could match human capabilities, “it would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate.”
He also said that due to biological limitations, there would be no way that humans could match the speed of the development of technology.
“Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded,” he said. “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
The document is signed by many representatives from Facebook, Google, Skype, and artificial intelligence companies DeepMind and Vicarious. Academics from many of the world’s most prestigious universities have also signed it, including those from Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, Stanford, and MIT.
Scientists join Elon Musk & Stephen Hawking, warn of dangerous AI
Hundreds of leading scientists and technologists have joined Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk in warning of the potential dangers of sophisticated artificial intelligence, signing an open letter calling for research on how to avoid harming humanity.
The open letter, drafted by the Future of Life Institute and signed by hundreds of academics and technologists, calls on the artificial intelligence science community to not only invest in research into making good decisions and plans for the future, but to also thoroughly check how those advances might affect society.
The letter’s authors recognize the remarkable successes in “speech recognition, image classification, autonomous vehicles, machine translation, legged location and question-answering systems,” and argue that it is not unfathomable that the research may lead to the eradication of disease and poverty. But they insisted that “our AI systems must do what we want them to do” and laid out research objectives that will “help maximize the societal benefit of AI.”
The document of research priorities says that future AI could potentially impact society in areas such as computer security, economics, law, and philosophy, and highlight many concerns for communities. For instance, scientists suggested that AI should be developed to analyze how workers – and their wages – would be affected if parts of the economy become automated.
They also suggested looking into various issues involving AI that need to be considered before breakthroughs are made that are considered beneficial to society: Can lethal autonomous weapons be made to comply with humanitarian law? How will AI systems be constrained over privacy rights when it comes to obtaining data from surveillance cameras, phone lines, and emails?
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has repeatedly voiced concerns about artificial intelligence, saying it could be more dangerous than nuclear weapons.
“I’m increasingly inclined to think there should be some regulatory oversight maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish,” he said.
Musk has invested in companies developing AI, and he advises “to keep an eye on them.”
Additionally, a group of scholars from Oxford University wrote in a blog post last year that “when a machine is ‘wrong,' it can be wrong in a far more dramatic way, with more unpredictable outcomes, than a human could. Simple algorithms should be extremely predictable, but can make bizarre decisions in 'unusual' circumstances."
World famous physicist Stephen Hawking, who relies on a form of artificial intelligence to communicate, told the BBC that if technology could match human capabilities, “it would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate.”
He also said that due to biological limitations, there would be no way that humans could match the speed of the development of technology.
“Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete and would be superseded,” he said. “The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race.”
The document is signed by many representatives from Facebook, Google, Skype, and artificial intelligence companies DeepMind and Vicarious. Academics from many of the world’s most prestigious universities have also signed it, including those from Cambridge, Oxford, Harvard, Stanford, and MIT.
Top Google executive predicts end of the internet
At the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Google guru Eric Schmidt gave an answer regarding the evolution of the web. “I will answer very simply that the internet will disappear,” Schmidt said on Thursday.
“There will be so many IP addresses, … so many devices, sensors, things that you are wearing, things that you are interacting with that you won’t even sense it, it will be part of your presence all the time,” heexplained. “Imagine you walk into a room, and the room is dynamic. And with your permission and all of that, you are interacting with the things going on in the room.”
“A highly personalized, highly interactive and very, very interesting world emerges,” Schmidt concluded.
At the panel, dubbed “The Future of the Digital Economy”, he was speaking with Vodafone CEO Vittorio Colao, Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.
Vodafone’s Chief Executive Officer Vittorio Colao agreed with Schmidt, comparing the internet with“water, oxygen” in an “ultra-dense connectivity situation.”
However, a group of Harvard professors depicted a much more grim Orwellian world, AFP reported on Thursday.
“Privacy as we knew it in the past is no longer feasible... How we conventionally think of privacy is dead,”said Margo Seltzer, a professor in computer science at Harvard University.
Sophia Roosth, a Harvard’s genetics researcher, said: “It's not whether this is going to happen, it's already happening... We live in a surveillance state today.”
Depicting a terrifying world, where mosquito-sized robots fly around stealing samples of people’s DNA, she said, “We are at the dawn of the age of genetic McCarthyism,” referring to “witch-hunts” during Second Red Scare in the 1950s in America.
+++
No insanity exposed here. Let me ask you, is this the sort of "creator" you trust to create the next generation of humanoids?
No insanity exposed here. Let me ask you, is this the sort of "creator" you trust to create the next generation of humanoids?
What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him?
Psalm 8:4 (King James Version)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What man is he that feareth the LORD? him shall he teach in the way that he shall choose.
Psalm 25:12 (King James Version)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What man is he that desireth life, and loveth many days, that he may see good?
Psalm 34:12 (King James Version)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What man is he that liveth, and shall not see death? shall he deliver his soul from the hand of the grave? Selah.
Psalm 89:48 (King James Version)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LORD, what is man, that thou takest knowledge of him! or the son of man, that thou makest account of him!
Psalm 144:3 (King James Version)
Archpriest Symeon Elias
Thank you, I see what I had not been able to see before.
ReplyDelete