In its partisan zeal to protect the ongoing witch hunt against President Trump, our Nixonian media
went into hyper-drive last week to ensure that the unethical and
un-American behavior of President Obama’s FBI and Justice Department remained covered up from the public.
After this cynical effort failed with the release of
the Nunes memo Friday,
the media quickly switched tactics and is now working feverishly to
muddy the waters about the horror show revealed in the memo.
To begin with, it is obvious that a hysterical talking point about declaring the release of the memo a “
Constitutional Crisis”
has been spread far and wide… Naturally, the “constitutional crisis” in
question is not the wrongdoing committed by federal law enforcement.
Instead, because we are now deep within the head of the media’s
fabricated reality where wrong is right and up is down, the
“constitutional crisis” is that government wrongdoing was uncovered.
One way the media are hoping to shield the federal government from
accountability for its indefensible lies, cover-ups, and civil rights
violations is to muddy the waters; to distract us with nonsense so that
we lose focus on the sins committed by an FBI and Department of Justice
(DOJ) that abused its power and public trust in unprecedented ways.
Here are 16 things the media do not want you to know about the Nunes memo:
- The so-called Russian Dossier, the creation of Fusion GPS and former
British spy Christopher Steele, is a political document — namely,
opposition research, created for the Democrat National Committee and
Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign.
- Using what it knew was opposition research paid for by the Clinton
campaign, in October of 2016, the FBI and DOJ obtained a FISA warrant
from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to install a
wiretap to spy on Hillary Clinton’s opponent — the Trump campaign,
specifically Carter Page. This spying would last for a year.
- It should be noted that the FISA court was set up to stop foreign
terrorists. The fact that the FBI and DOJ would use this court to not
only wiretap an American but to wiretap a presidential campaign belies
belief. Why Obama’s FBI and DOJ used this court as opposed to a normal
court is obvious. As you will see below, a normal court probably would
have denied the wiretap.
- Worse still, in the summer of 2016, Obama’s DOJ had already opened a
counter-intelligence investigation into the Trump campaign. The fact
that nothing from that months-old partisan investigation was used to obtain the Page wiretap is revealing.
- According to the Nunes memo, an “essential” part of the FISA wiretap
application was the Steele dossier, which again is a partisan political
document created for the Clinton campaign.
- So essential was this partisan dossier, Andrew McCabe, the disgraced
former-Deputy Director of the FBI, admitted in December that “no
surveillance warrant would have been sought” without the dossier.
- Not only did the FBI knowingly use a document from a partisan
campaign to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on the competing campaign, the
FBI knew the dossier was mostly “salacious and unverified.” We know this
because disgraced former-FBI Director James Comey told us so in June of 2017.
- According to the Nunes memo, “Steele told [former FBI official
Bruce] Ohr, he ‘was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was
passionate about him not being president.'”
- Ohr, who was part of the FBI’s anti-Trump Russian investigation, was not only friendly with Steele, Ohr’s own wife worked with Steele at Fusion GPS doing opposition research (the dossier) against Trump for the Clinton campaign.
- Despite a) knowing the dossier was opposition research paid for by
the Clinton campaign b) knowing the dossier was “salacious and
unverified” c) knowing Steele was desperate to destroy Trump d) the
breathtaking conflict of interest in having an investigator’s own wife
working on the dossier, the FBI still went to the FISA court to obtain
permission to spy on Hillary Clinton’s opponent.
- In order to obtain a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign, all of
the conflicts of interest above were withheld from the FISA court — an
indefensible (and possibly illegal) lie of omission.
- Even worse, in order to legitimize a warrant request based on a
piece of partisan opposition research they knew was “salacious and
unverified,” the FBI and DOJ used a media report
to bolster the findings in the phony dossier. The FBI and DOJ told the
court that the media report was independent verification of the dossier.
But this was not true, and, according to the Nunes memo, the FBI and
DOJ knew this was not true. The truth is that the phony dossier was the source of this media report.
- Also hidden from the FISA court was the fact that the FBI obtained
Steele as a source but had to fire him in October of 2016 when, in a bid
to use his phony dossier to derail the Trump campaign, he leaked his
information to the far-left Mother Jones.
- Although the FBI and DOJ were willing participants in pushing a
“salacious and unverified” narrative against a presidential candidate
(primarily through media leaks), this was all hidden from congressional
investigators. To begin with, for months, while under oath, Comey said
he did not know where the dossier came from — meaning from the Clinton
campaign. The Wall Street Journal explains:
We also know the FBI wasn’t straight with
Congress, as it hid most of these facts from investigators in a
briefing on the dossier in January 2017. The FBI did not tell Congress
about Mr. Steele’s connection to the Clinton campaign, and the House had
to issue subpoenas for Fusion bank records to discover the truth. Nor
did the FBI tell investigators that it continued receiving information
from Mr. Steele and Fusion even after it had terminated him. The memo
says the bureau’s intermediary was Justice Department official Bruce
Ohr, whose wife, incredibly, worked for Fusion.
- All of this dishonesty occurred under Comey, the man our media now
hold up as a living saint, a man so desperate to destroy Trump, he not
only oversaw those committing the above abuses, he leaked classified information
to the news media in order to see a Special Prosecutor appointed
against Trump, which his pal, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein,
immediately did.
And finally…
16. Much of the “salacious and
unverified” material in the dossier came from the Russians. In other
words, those disgusting dossier lies about Trump’s personal behavior
came from Russian operatives. So there is no question that it was the
Clinton campaign, Democrats, Steele, the FBI, and DOJ who colluded with
the Russians to rig a presidential election.
Yes, there was collusion with the Russians, and those in our
government currently investigating Trump in the hopes of overturning a
presidential election are the colluders.
Follow John Nolte on Twitter @NolteNC. Follow his Facebook Page here.
No comments:
Post a Comment