We keep talking about our present War as if we can choose and dictate the circumstances we face, instead of recognizing the circumstances we face and answering the challenge. We want to talk about the Constitution and Principles when our enemy just wants to KILL US.
Are we capable of breaking out of our mythology and facing the present situation on the ground, taking a realistic view our of enemy and refusing to be his victim. Even the mild mannered Newt Gingrich said that the two sides of this conflict are irreconcilable, that there was no possibility of creating "unity" and that one side or the other had to be defeated and the other side had to win.
The situation is simple, the Globalist/Marxists/Crony Capitalists want to KILL US. Do you want to be a warrior or a victim.
+++
+++ :
Times Square had the ball drop, and Brasstown, N.C., had its descending possum. But no place had a New Year’s Eve as unusual, or freakishly disturbing, as Beebe, Ark.
Around 11 that night, thousands of red-winged blackbirds
began falling out of the sky over this small city about 35 miles
northeast of Little Rock. They landed on roofs, roads, front lawns and
backyards, turning the ground nearly black and terrifying anyone who
happened to be outside.
“One
of them almost hit my best friend in the head,” said Christy Stephens,
who was standing outside among the smoking crowd at a party. “We went
inside after that.”
The cause is still being determined, but preliminary lab results
from the Arkansas Livestock and Poultry Commission revealed “acute
physical trauma” in samples of the dead birds. There were no indications
of disease, though tests were still being done for the presence of
toxic chemicals.
Karen
Rowe, the bird conservation program coordinator for the Arkansas Game
and Fish Commission, said the prevailing theory was that the birds had
been startled by New Year’s Eve fireworks and suddenly dispersed, flying
low enough to run into chimneys, houses and trees. Pyrotechnics are
used to scatter blackbirds for bird control, though only during the day,
given the birds’ poor vision.
Beebe
(pronounced BE-be) is a congregating spot for blackbirds, and one
witness told Ms. Rowe that he saw the birds roosting earlier in the day
and heard them again at night just after the fireworks started.
“It was the right mix of things happening in a perfect time sequence,” Ms. Rowe said.
At
most recent count, up to 5,000 birds fell on the city. Sixty five
samples were sent to labs, one of which is at the Livestock and Poultry
Commission and the other in Madison, Wis.
Keith
Stephens, a spokesman for the commission, said he was not aware of a
case this large. “About nine years ago we had some ducks,” he said, “but
that was only a couple of dozen.”
The
town contacted an environmental cleanup firm, which by Monday afternoon
had picked up nearly all the birds, some of which were bagged and left
at the end of driveways by residents.
“It
just looked as if it had rained birds,” said Tracy Lightfoot, a member
of the City Council, declining to speculate on the reason. “There’s lots
of theories running around. I have no idea. I just don’t have a clue.”
State
scientists believe one thing to be almost certain: that the bird deaths
were not related to the roughly 85,000 fish that died a few days before
near Ozark, in the western part of the state, the biggest fish kill in
Arkansas that anyone can remember. They were spotted by anglers along
the Arkansas River last week and reported to the Game and Fish
Commission, which spent New Year’s Eve measuring and counting dead fish
that had spread out for nearly 20 miles.
In
that case, the victims were almost all drum, and almost all younger
ones. That suggests the culprit was disease, said Mark Oliver, the chief
of fisheries for the commission. He said fish kills were not uncommon,
especially in winter when the fish are packed more closely, but he did
not recall one of this size.
Meanwhile
roughly 500 dead birds were found on Monday outside New Roads, La.
Those birds were much more varied, with starlings and grackle in
addition to blackbirds, and a few samples picked up by James LaCour, a
wildlife veterinarian with the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries, did not show any signs of trauma, he said.
+++
When you realize the reality of this technology, this single technology out of the many, many new technologies, Zibignew Brezinsky's statement, "It use to be that it was easier to control a million people than to kill a million people, today it is imminently easier to kill a million people than to control a million people" has bone chilling effect.
To have a clue, and by that I mean, being able to process what this video is teaching you need to understand that already, admitted by the U.S. Government for almost a decade, they have been for quite some time manufacturing on the NANO level.
Try to imagine what this government public (.gov) article says:
+++
When you realize the reality of this technology, this single technology out of the many, many new technologies, Zibignew Brezinsky's statement, "It use to be that it was easier to control a million people than to kill a million people, today it is imminently easier to kill a million people than to control a million people" has bone chilling effect.
To have a clue, and by that I mean, being able to process what this video is teaching you need to understand that already, admitted by the U.S. Government for almost a decade, they have been for quite some time manufacturing on the NANO level.
Try to imagine what this government public (.gov) article says:
Just how small is “nano?” In the International System of Units, the prefix "nano" means one-billionth, or 10-9;
therefore one nanometer is one-billionth of a meter. It’s difficult to
imagine just how small that is, so here are some examples:
- A sheet of paper is about 100,000 nanometers thick
- A strand of human DNA is 2.5 nanometers in diameter
- There are 25,400,000 nanometers in one inch
- A human hair is approximately 80,000- 100,000 nanometers wide
- A single gold atom is about a third of a nanometer in diameter
- On a comparative scale, if the diameter of a marble was one nanometer, then diameter of the Earth would be about one meter
- One nanometer is about as long as your fingernail grows in one second
The Scale of Things |
When one of the vice presidents of Lockheed-Martin Corporation was explaining the size of a nano-meter to me, he used this example. "If you took the number of nano-meters it would take to journey across a cross-section of a single human hair, it would be a number only calculable by to the x power, language. Now, if you expanded each one of those nano-meters to the size of an inch, and you took hold of it, and someone else took the other end and stretched the string to make the string taunt, they would have to be standing on the Moon, and we are looking at moving and in fact manufacturing on the nano-scale." This idea is almost too much to fathom, but it is fact and public knowledge, here is an article on gov.com stating so.
Poem Written by Archpriest Symeon Elias in 1974:
Poem Written by Archpriest Symeon Elias in 1974:
THE
ALL
Infinity
into greatness
Infinity
into the small
A
tiny dot of perception
On
the Master’s Sanctuary Wall
We
yearn to gain the courage
We
yearn to strive and fail
We
are so serious in the battling
Driving
our very own coffin’s nail.
It
is all perception
All
measure and degree
Mostly
ghosts clinging to bushes,
Meadow
mist and forest tree.
Glade
of smokey sunshine
Wintergreen
and gall,
Bitter
tastes and moonlight
After
and before the fall.
What
dreaming is perceiving?
What
practice is the song?
What
planning is the living?
What
merit in right or wrong?
But
there is meaning in the moonlight
Like
the cold of the sun’s ray.
Light
in the darkness,
Like
darkness in the noonday.
Pain
and passion and wanting,
Love
and dream’s decay.
Listening
for the silence;
The
signal sounds of the Way.
Redeemer,
do I know you?
Do
I tread your path?
Do
I shed tears in solitude?
Is
love of all my cleansing bath?
Am
I ego-less in the morning?
Am
I Ego-All at noon?
Then
ego-less in the evening
When
Ego-All must bloom?
Covering
my musty sore soul,
My
losing and my gains,
Covering
my rebellions,
My
illusions of joy and pain.
To
breathe the air of freedom
While
held solidly by my chains.
My
body held in the dust,
My
spirit on another plane.
I
can see into the distance
Where
measure has no name.
When
past and future time lines
Are
both impostors just the same.
Where
quality and number
Are
screeching sound of lies and discord,
Where
the All is Peace and at Rest,
And
the Rest is the Lord.
A
thousand trumpets silently call!
Ten
thousand angels do not sing!
Ten
billion people one and all,
No
curse or praise to bring.
No
deed left for the purpose,
No
mission, no glory, no call,
No
work or path or wayside,
Just
Being and being in All.
No
word to interrupt the harmony,
No
harmony we would understand.
No
sound and no silence,
No
wisdom at my command.
Soul
with empowered body,
Existence
within all being.
Sight
without the vision,
No
eyes to dull the seeing.
The
All is in His sanctuary!
And
His sanctuary is the All!
And
we are of its brick and mortar
Lively
stones, one and all!!! - MK (Butch Robinson) 1974
Nanotechnology is more than just mixing nanoscale materials
together; it requires the ability to understand and to precisely
manipulate and control those materials in a useful way.
Nanotechnology involves a new and broad science where diverse fields such as physics, chemistry, biology, materials science, and engineering converge at the nanoscale.
It is also important to understand that nanoscale materials are found in nature. For instance, hemoglobin, the oxygen-transporting protein found in red blood cells, is 5.5 nanometers in diameter. Naturally occurring nanomaterials exist all around us, such as in smoke from fire, volcanic ash, and sea spray. Some nanomaterials are a byproduct of human activity, such as bus and automobile exhaust and welding fumes.
You may recall from the Size of the Nanoscale page that the nanoscale is about 1 to 100 nanometers. Working at the nanoscale requires an understanding of the various types and dimensions of nanoscale materials. Different types of nanomaterials are named for their individual shapes and dimensions. Think of these simply as particles, tubes, wires, films, flakes, or shells that have one or more nanometer-sized dimension. For example, carbon nanotubes have a diameter in the nanoscale, but can be several hundred nanometers long or even longer. Nanofilms or nanoplates have a thickness in the nanoscale, but their other two dimensions can be much larger.
The key is to be able to both see and manipulate nanomaterials in order to take advantage of their special properties. As mentioned earlier, the invention of special microscopes gave scientists the ability to work at the nanoscale. The first of these new discoveries was the scanning tunneling microscope. While it’s mainly designed to measure objects, it can also move tiny objects such as carbon nanotubes.
The
earliest example of this type of process was accomplished by IBM on
November 11, 1989, when researcher Don Eigler and colleagues spelled the
company logo in atoms. He and his team were able to literally move 35 xenon atoms on a background of copper atoms to spell out IBM.
More recently a team of Stanford University researchers led by Hari Manoharan were able to encode 35 bits of information per electron and write letters so small they are composed of subatomic bits of matter only 0.3 nanometers wide, or roughly one third of a billionth of a meter. In other words, they beat the record set by IBM, writing Stanford’s initials in letters smaller than atoms. These exercises demonstrated the precision with which it is possible to manipulate matter.
Today, research scientists in universities and companies around the world are manufacturing nanomaterials
to make new products and applications, from medical devices and drugs
that may treat disease, to strong and lightweight materials that reduce
fuel costs for cars and planes. For more information about these
discoveries and inventions, see Benefits and Applications here on the Nano.gov website.
+++
Understand please that if they are publishing this technology, what they hold as classified and top-secret is light years beyond what they are telling us. I you can comprehend this then the remainder of what is on my video will be comprehensible to you. If you cannot, it will seem like "science fiction" "crazy conspiracy theory" even pure foolishness.
Here is a demonstration of a particle weapon capable of deconstructing the molecules of a skyscraper, turning it into dust in a matter of seconds, making it literally "Dustify" as fast a free fall, as if its supporting structure did not exist.
I am teaching you this science in an understandable way so you can learn to add this information to your tool bag of observations and thoughts. (Insert Dr Wood, explaining "dustification.")
Understand that this is difficult to mentally process, (1) that such technology exists and (2) that the government used it to create a False Flag event for purposes of GMIIC (that is Globalist Military Industrial/Intelligence Complex) CONTROL.
The aforementioned Vice President of Lockheed-Martin said to me, "Imagine the most sophisticated weapon you know exists." I named the Global Hawk, and this was years before it was declassified. He said, "Now picture that the Global Hawk is the equivalent of a medieval broad-ax or mace, and even that does not adequately describe the type and power of weapons we presently have DEPLOYED, much less what is perfected and held of later times. But let me put you at ease, it is not quite right to called our main projects weapons. We will soon have to power to enforce a permanent peace." That list sentence has driven my curiosity since. One has to realize that without total control (which is the same as complete totalitarian control) such an ability to enforce permanent peace would be impossible. He punched that line with, "We already have to power to vaporize and army while it prepared to deploy, or to simply paralyze it for a time." Again, this sounds like science fiction and would that it were.
(Insert Judy Wood smiling while seeing the towers struck by "planes." )
Now, if you are still with me, you will hear what this next speaker has to say and will not write her off as a kook. Would that she were a kook; would that what she is saying were fantasy, but it is not, it is the state of military science (at least the part they are admitting); the state of our world and very, very real.
Computer simulation of hemoglobin, a naturally occuring nanoscale protein that is found in blood. (Image: Centers for Disease Control) |
It is also important to understand that nanoscale materials are found in nature. For instance, hemoglobin, the oxygen-transporting protein found in red blood cells, is 5.5 nanometers in diameter. Naturally occurring nanomaterials exist all around us, such as in smoke from fire, volcanic ash, and sea spray. Some nanomaterials are a byproduct of human activity, such as bus and automobile exhaust and welding fumes.
You may recall from the Size of the Nanoscale page that the nanoscale is about 1 to 100 nanometers. Working at the nanoscale requires an understanding of the various types and dimensions of nanoscale materials. Different types of nanomaterials are named for their individual shapes and dimensions. Think of these simply as particles, tubes, wires, films, flakes, or shells that have one or more nanometer-sized dimension. For example, carbon nanotubes have a diameter in the nanoscale, but can be several hundred nanometers long or even longer. Nanofilms or nanoplates have a thickness in the nanoscale, but their other two dimensions can be much larger.
The key is to be able to both see and manipulate nanomaterials in order to take advantage of their special properties. As mentioned earlier, the invention of special microscopes gave scientists the ability to work at the nanoscale. The first of these new discoveries was the scanning tunneling microscope. While it’s mainly designed to measure objects, it can also move tiny objects such as carbon nanotubes.
IBM logo written with 35 xenon atoms on a copper substrate. (Image courtesy: IBM) |
More recently a team of Stanford University researchers led by Hari Manoharan were able to encode 35 bits of information per electron and write letters so small they are composed of subatomic bits of matter only 0.3 nanometers wide, or roughly one third of a billionth of a meter. In other words, they beat the record set by IBM, writing Stanford’s initials in letters smaller than atoms. These exercises demonstrated the precision with which it is possible to manipulate matter.
Artist's rendering of "SU" written in letters smaller than individual atoms. (Image courtesy: Stanford University) |
+++
Understand please that if they are publishing this technology, what they hold as classified and top-secret is light years beyond what they are telling us. I you can comprehend this then the remainder of what is on my video will be comprehensible to you. If you cannot, it will seem like "science fiction" "crazy conspiracy theory" even pure foolishness.
Here is a demonstration of a particle weapon capable of deconstructing the molecules of a skyscraper, turning it into dust in a matter of seconds, making it literally "Dustify" as fast a free fall, as if its supporting structure did not exist.
I am teaching you this science in an understandable way so you can learn to add this information to your tool bag of observations and thoughts. (Insert Dr Wood, explaining "dustification.")
Understand that this is difficult to mentally process, (1) that such technology exists and (2) that the government used it to create a False Flag event for purposes of GMIIC (that is Globalist Military Industrial/Intelligence Complex) CONTROL.
The aforementioned Vice President of Lockheed-Martin said to me, "Imagine the most sophisticated weapon you know exists." I named the Global Hawk, and this was years before it was declassified. He said, "Now picture that the Global Hawk is the equivalent of a medieval broad-ax or mace, and even that does not adequately describe the type and power of weapons we presently have DEPLOYED, much less what is perfected and held of later times. But let me put you at ease, it is not quite right to called our main projects weapons. We will soon have to power to enforce a permanent peace." That list sentence has driven my curiosity since. One has to realize that without total control (which is the same as complete totalitarian control) such an ability to enforce permanent peace would be impossible. He punched that line with, "We already have to power to vaporize and army while it prepared to deploy, or to simply paralyze it for a time." Again, this sounds like science fiction and would that it were.
(Insert Judy Wood smiling while seeing the towers struck by "planes." )
Now, if you are still with me, you will hear what this next speaker has to say and will not write her off as a kook. Would that she were a kook; would that what she is saying were fantasy, but it is not, it is the state of military science (at least the part they are admitting); the state of our world and very, very real.