+++
It took Rex's radio partner quite a while to grasp that POWER and WEALTH are not synonymous. He was one of those who saw everything as economic struggle. In a recent broadcast he expressed the understanding that it was not the money that created a society and nation, but the quality of the people. He said something to the effect that the greatest accumulation of wealth was meaningless unless there were people of quality who knew how to use it. As an example of the wisdom Trog expressed in this idea, look at the pre-CIA-destroyed Nation of Persia; it was a deep civilization encompassing innovations of Great Art and Literature, its form of Islam was tolerant. Why? Because, in that Persian Culture, Zoroastrian Spirituality had modified it and Christians and Zoroastrian were tolerated and not penalized for not being Muslim. Even after 70 years of assault by the CIA, if you compare the depth of the relatively wealthy nation Persia, now called Iran, with the depth of the MEGA wealthy nation Saudi Arabia, you can see that the difference in the quality of life is not the wealth of the nation, but the quality of the people, and the quality of the people is created by to what degree does the population seek Truth, Beauty and Goodness. Even after 70 years of constant assault by the CIA/Jihaids and the active effort to destroy its culture and make it subservient to CIA/Jihadi Control, the Culture, the Society of Iran is STILL infinitely superior to that of Saudi Arabia, which is wealthier.
Wealth, left to the reason of man alone, without the influence of TRUTH who is a person, and the Goodness and Beauty reflected in the societies knowingly or unknowingly seeking HIM, represents only human pride which over the course of human history has built Tower of Babel after Tower of Babel.
Excerpted from an article by the Late Steve Kangas:
The wealthy have always used many methods to accumulate wealth, but it was not until the mid-19 70s that these methods coalesced into a superbly organized, cohesive and efficient machine. After 1975, it became greater than the sum of its parts, a smooth flowing organization of advocacy groups, lobbyists, think tanks, conservative foundations, and Public Relations firms that hurtled the richest 1 percent into the stratosphere.
Editor's note. Mr Kangas just gave a most accurate description of the elite . of the New World Order. We are not talking about the richest one percent in the U.S., but the richest one percent in the world. These people have taken control of America, her technology and power, turned the European states in to vassal states. One German reporter stricken with conscience . for his propaganda work for the CIA, said that Germany was little more than an American Colony. That the German Intelligence service was merely a department of the CIA. We know that European defense spending, the money they put up for their own armies is about 2 point 6 percent of America's defense budget, not counting the hundreds of billions of CIA off budget operations, hidden in the budgets of other departments, and from its many other enterprises and sources of income. This 1 percent in control of international banking and finance, the chiefs in every institution of genocidal manipulation . the world bank . the international monetary fund . UNESCO . USAID, the Endowment for Democracy and on and on, are all controlled by the same political and police force. That is the 1 percent, with their pit bull called America, and America's military and CIA.
What you cannot seem to yet grasp, is that they are also in control of the two political, show parties, the Republican and Democratic parties. So than anyone acting inside that system, feigning to be a candidate for national office, feigning to be your next savior, is mere puppet of the system, just as surely as the Chancellor of Germany is a puppet of the same system, just as surely as is the president of the Omni-Surveillance Totalitarian New World Order Police State of America. They are puppets of a system the one percent have installed and operate, like puppet masters, they pull the strings of the most powerful appearing people in the world.
You say, in your hypnotized state, believing the political system real, "but I will be very active and work inside the system to make a difference." and you say, "we can take back control by this method." You make the elite very happy when you say that, because then they know they can control you, keep you chasing the puppet rabbit like a greyhound on a track. Crushed and disappointed when you catch one, only to realize it is a puppet. But like a lowly beast, unable to rationally connect the dots, you remain ever ready to believe in the reality of the next puppet . in the next race. This time it is a real rabbit. Now add the name of your candidate. . . . End Editor's Note
The origins of this machine, interestingly enough, can be traced back to the CIA. This is not to say the machine is a formal CIA operation, complete with code name and signed documents. (Although such evidence may yet surface — and previously unthinkable domestic operations such as MK-ULTRA, CHAOS and MOCKINGBIRD show this to be a distinct possibility.) But what we do know already indicts the CIA strongly enough. Its principle creators were Irving Kristol, Paul Weyrich, William Simon, Richard Mellon Scaife, Frank Shakespeare, William F. Buckley, Jr., the Rockefeller family, and more. Almost all the machine's creators had CIA backgrounds.
During the 1970s, these men would take the propaganda and operational techniques they had learned in the Cold War and apply them to the Class War. Therefore it is no surprise that the American version of the machine bears an uncanny resemblance to the foreign versions designed to fight communism. The CIA's expert and comprehensive organization of the business class would succeed beyond their wildest dreams. In 1975, the richest 1 percent owned 22 percent of America’s wealth. By 1992, they would nearly double that, to 42 percent — the highest level of inequality in the 20th century.
Editor's note. C B S reported in January of 20 15, that Economic in-equality is set to reach a worrying tipping point next year, when the richest 1 percent will control more than half of the world's wealth. You see, this one percent, with the power of the shadow, but true government power, are the over-lords, of the New World Order. We can identify them. The C B S article further stated.
(The “1 percent” are richer than you thought – http://cbsnews.com/news/the-1-percent-are-richer-than-you-thought/
That's the prediction from the charity Oxfam, which will deliver its report on the world's growing wealth gap at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which kicks off on Wednesday. The report tracks the startling rise in the fortunes of the world's rich, who have seen their control of global wealth rise from 44 percent in 2009 to 48 percent in 2014.
Oxfam is aiming to gain the notice of the world's leaders at Davos, where billionaires gather to discuss some of the planet's most pressing issues, such as climate change and Ebola. Yet observers may wonder if the report's message will fall on deaf ears, especially given the attendees at Davos include many of the world's richest people, including Google's executive chairman Eric Schmidt, who is worth $8.1 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires index. End Editor's note.
How did this alliance start? The CIA has always recruited the nation’s elite: millionaire businessmen, Wall Street brokers, members of the national news media, and Ivy League scholars. During World War II, General "Wild Bill" Donovan became chief of the Office of Strategic Services (O S S), the forerunner of the CIA. Donovan recruited so exclusively from the nation’s rich and powerful that members eventually came to joke that "O S S" stood for "Oh, so social!"
Another early elite was Allen Dulles, who served as Director of the CIA from 1953 to 1961. Dulles was a senior partner at the Wall Street firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, which represented the Rockefeller empire and other mammoth trusts, corporations and cartels. He was also a board member of the J. Henry Schroeder Bank, with offices in Wall Street, London, Zurich and Hamburg. His financial interests across the world would become a conflict of interest when he became head of the CIA. Like Donavan, he would recruit exclusively from society’s elite.
By the 1950s, the CIA had riddled the nation’s businesses, media and universities with tens of thousands of part-time, on-call operatives. Their employment with the agency took a variety of forms, which included:
Leaving one's profession to work for the CIA in a formal, official capacity.
Staying in one's profession, using the job as cover for CIA activity. This undercover activity could be full-time, part-time, or on-call.
Staying in one's profession, occasionally passing along information useful to the CIA.
Passing through the revolving door that has always existed between the agency and the business world.
( the mighty wurletzer: HOW THE CIA PLAYED AMERICA – by Hugh Wilford – Harvard Press. - Note** “Played” past tense. It would take a fool not to realize that what has been the history, is not expanded exponentially, by the power and resources dubbed, “Homeland Security.” That earlier reference to the NIP, the National Intelligence Program's budget should give you a hint. What Hugh Eilford tells of the past, has to be extrapolate into the present. Why? Because we know for certain the direction of government has not changed. )
Historically, the CIA and society’s elite have been one and the same people. This means that their interests and goals are one and the same as well. Perhaps the most frequent description of the intelligence community is the 'old' boy network, where members socialize, talk shop, conduct business and tap each other for favors well outside the formal halls of government.
Many common traits made it inevitable that the CIA and Corporate America would become allies. Both share an intense dislike of democracy, and feel they should be liberated from democratic regulations and oversight. Both share a culture of secrecy, either hiding their actions from the American public or lying about them to present the best public image. And both are in a perfect position to help each other.
No comments:
Post a Comment