Adult Males Buggering, contrary to nature,Teenage Boys, tolerated. - Evidence Congressman Gerry Studds.
This is MARXISM and not Morality.
This is Marxist Ritual Defamation not justice for victims.
washingtontimes.com
Gerry Studds forgiven by Democrats for preying on teen boys
The Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com8-10 minutes
(Edited and Expanded by Letters From the Gulag.
Massachusetts voters stood by Democratic Rep. Gerry Studds even after he was censured by the House in 1983 for his sexual relationship at age 36 with a teen-aged congressional page, as well as making sexual advances toward two other teenage pages.
Far from dooming the Democratic Party, the episode barely registered at the ballot box. (Why? There was not Ritual Defamation by the CIA American Media, there wasn't a massive propaganda operation of SHAMING this sick Congressman, and equal SHAMING of the people who supported him.) Democrats kept their House majority and gained Senate seats in 1984, while Studds was re-elected in his liberal Cape Cod district with 56 percent of the vote.
This sick puppy won re-election five more times and was ultimately named chairman of the House Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee before retiring in 1997. He died in 2006. I'm sure he enjoyed his inspection of those young Merchant Marines.
Gerry Studds even received HONORS:
A national marine fishery was named for him in 1996, and in June, the University of Massachusetts Press published a biography, “Gerry Studds: America’s First Openly Gay Congressman,” which discussed the scandal as well as his achievements on domestic and foreign policy. Studds was a faithful SOLDIER of the Marxist Deconstructionist agenda; these SOLDIERS have for decades lived in a protective bubble, the protective bubble of a WARRIOR, immune to prosecution and consequences for their amoral actions. It is not about moral or immoral, for them it is about the Amorality (without morals) pursuit of everything that destroys Christian Tradition morality and culture.
The Washington Times wrote:
"That is not how the scenario is expected to play out for Mr. Moore and the Republican Party if he wins Alabama’s Senate seat." And they are right because the Congress is Luciferian and CHRISTIANS, that is REAL CHRISTIANS willing to allow their CHRISTIAN conviction to government their public life in Government are NOT Tolerated.
The last video I outlined the DEEP Sacrifices the Marxists were willing to make to keep a CHRISTIAN from the Congress.
The Washington Times stated it this way:
Political analysts predict a Moore victory will become the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats next year, especially after they cleaned house last week by forcing out two lawmakers accused of sexual harassment, Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota and Rep. John Conyers Jr. of Michigan. (The Republican Party also registered a sexual harassment loss last week: Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona announced his resignation over his surrogacy discussions with female staffers.) You see he wanted to knock them up the old fashioned way.
“[T]he outcome here is there’s no good outcome for the Republicans, that either a Democrat is going to go to the U.S. Senate from the reddest state in America, or Roy Moore’s going to win and he is going to be a brand anvil on the Republican Party,” GOP strategist Scott Jennings told NPR. “And so I think, in some ways, the Republican Party’s already lost the race.”
It is not Roy Moore, or the Alabama Race that is the problem or loss. It is the loss of the Cultural War to the Marxists who are exercising the MEGA WEAPON of RITUAL DEFAMATION with ease and at will, even willing to sacrifice important SOLDIERS in the Revolutionary Movement to "Suicide Bomb" Christians like Roy Moore.
The Marxist Soldier, Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado, who heads the National Republican Senate Committee, has called for the Senate to expel Mr. Moore if he wins. He said Thursday that the NRSC will never endorse the Republican candidate. Why? on grounds of "morality"? Hardly, solely on grounds of ANTI-CHRIST LUCIFERIAN Philosophy.
“If Mr. Moore wins, he will haunt the Trump Presidency,” The Wall Street Journal said Thursday in an editorial. “The Democrats took their sexual harassers off the table. Mr. Trump may put his party’s in the Senate. Every day, the Democrats and the Beltway media will run the narrative that Senator Roy Moore is Donald Trump’s doppelganger.”
This proves that the Wall Street Journal is Luciferian as well. Why? Because it outlines the OUTCOME of the Marxist Ritual Defamation, without telling the Truth and Identifying the Marxist Instrument in use.
Now compare this Ritual Defamation Marxist TRAP just outline for Trump and Roy Moore whether or NOT Roy Moore cobbles together enough absentee ballots to force a recount, or whether or not he takes office.
It was a far different story in 1984. Democrats paid virtually no political price for supporting Studds, who came out as gay during the 1983 investigation and was later celebrated as a civil rights pioneer for being the first openly homosexual elected to Congress.
A Yale graduate who could trace his lineage to Elbridge Gerry, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, Studds received support from those who argued that the episode in his “private life” had no bearing on his ability to represent his district. (And remember this was not some ancient history, as with Roy Moore, but his preying on Multiple Congressional Pages, a current event.)
The CIA's Washington Post columnist Colman McCarthy rebuked “gay-baiters” in the district who called for Studds to resign. He accused them of leading a “witch hunt” over a “brief consenting homosexual relationship with a congressional page.” You see, hit and run buggering of teens by these Cultural Marxists is just FINE.
“The censure should have been the end of it,” Mr. McCarthy said in a September 1983 column. “Studds said he acted stupidly and expressed regrets.”
Alcohol-fueled sexual seduction.
There was considerably more focus on the welfare of Pages in a recent Post op-ed by a former Senate page, who warned about the consequences of placing Mr. Moore in the vicinity of “children.”
Folks, this is not relative morality, moral relativism expressed in hypocrisy, this is the OPERATION of a MEGA WEAPON of Marxist Ritual Defamation.
“Whoever fills the seat from Alabama should be able to look at the pages and see hope and innocence. But Moore does not appear to see children that way,” said Madison Haddix. “How can Moore be expected to make decisions with the interests of children at heart when he stands accused of betraying children?”
Certainly there are differences between the two cases. Mr. Moore has been accused of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl and dating or making advances toward other teenage girls, including a 14-year-old, in the 1970s when he was in his 30s. He has denied any improper conduct, including dating teenagers.
Studds admitted to engaging in an affair with a teenaged page in 1973, but both he and the page told the House special counsel that their relationship was consensual. It also wasn’t illegal, given that the age of consent in the District of Columbia was 16.
That doesn’t mean there was nothing untoward about Studds‘ behavior. According to the investigation, the affair began when the congressman invited the page back to his Georgetown apartment, where they drank vodka and cranberry juice until Studds said he was too drunk to drive the boy home.
At that point, “the congressman engaged the page in sexual activity,” said the House Standards on Official Conduct Committee’s report.
The page testified that he was “flattered and excited” by Studds‘ attention but that he had reservations about the sexual aspect. He called the relationship “one of the more wonderful experiences of my life, if we exclude the instances of sexual experience, which I was somewhat uncomfortable with.”
“Well, I kept company with him because he was an intelligent man, a fun person to be with. If I could have had my druthers, I would have had the friendship that I had with the man without the sex,” the page said. “And I mentioned that to him.”
No matter how soft-soaped the words are, the Page traded sex for the friendship with the Sexual Predator.
Even so, they had sex on multiple occasions, including during a two-week trip in August 1973 to Portugal, paid for without public funds.
Inviting pages back to his place and plying them with alcoholic beverages was apparently the congressman’s modus operandi. Two other male pages said they refused his sexual advances after he drove them in separate incidents to his home at night for drinks.
It got to the point where the Republican cloakroom page supervisor warned one of the pages “that [he] and the other kids should keep their distance.”
Studds never apologized, he merely acknowledged that the relationship represented a “very serious error in judgment” while arguing that no coercion, intimidation or favoritism was involved.
The House committee special counsel advised that “such conduct constitutes improper sexual conduct” under House rules.
“The House has always regarded pages as its wards and has always accepted a special responsibility to them,” said the report.
Studds was defiant the day he was censured in a 420-3 vote, turning his back on the full House as the motion was read. His constituents gave him two standing ovations at his next town hall in Martha’s Vineyard.
Do you understand what this is saying? By 1983 Marthar's Vineyard was already so Marxized, it was celebrating the destruction of innocence, the victimization of the young, through homosexual debauchery.
Studds engaged in a faux marriage ceremony with another pervert Dean Hara in 2004, the year same-sex marriage was legalized in Massachusetts by the Luciferian Mitt Romney, and died two years later at age 69. (that is poetic.)
Mr. Hara (or is it Mrs Studds) defended the 12-term lawmaker’s conduct with the page by telling The Associated Press, “This young man knew what he was doing.”
Now just to press home the point that this is about Amoral Cultural Marxist Ritual Defamation, which will tolerate ANYTHING including mass murder to further the AGENDA and nothing to do with morality, consider that:
The other congressman embroiled in the 1983 congressional page scandal didn’t fare so well. Rep. Dan Crane, Illinois Republican, was censured by the House on the same day as Studds after admitting to having a consensual sexual relationship with a 17-year-old female page. The following year, Mr. Crane lost his re-election bid to Democrat Terry Bruce.
Even though Mr. Crane was disciplined by the House at the same time for virtually the same offense, Studds maintained that his sexuality was a factor in his censure, proving that he was insulated from his immoral conduct by the Cultural Marxist Agenda.
“There was a big investigation of allegations of misconduct with pages, and they nailed one heterosexual and balanced it off with one gay member,” Studds later told OutHistory in an interview.
The House killed its page program in 2011 after nearly 180 years, saying technological advances had made it unnecessary.
(Editor's Note: I'm sure that was a huge disappointment for a Capitol building filled with Chicken Hawks.)
Copyright © 2017 The Washington Times, LLC.
No comments:
Post a Comment