Sunday, March 26, 2017

IN Answer to "Finding Jesus' Scrotum in the Shroud of Turin" Buzzfeed 3.26.17

The Question:
“It is not possible to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was male as we now define maleness.” - Dr. Susannah Cornwall.

The Author:
Candida R. Moss (born 26 November 1978) is an English academic who is Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity on the theology faculty of the University of Notre Dame in South Bend, Indiana in the United States. A graduate of Oxford and Yale universities, Moss specializes in the study of martyrdom in the early Christian church.

This article represents the Cultural Marxist conquest of Roman Catholic Academia. This Notre Dame professor could write about, Dr. Susannah Cornwall, a truly sad theological Christian-deconstructionist, who wrote the book: "Un/Familiar Theology: Reconceiving Sex, Reproduction and Generativity, London, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2017". . . .

Moss writes of Cornwall, "Her arguments prompted some fierce pushback, but should not be quickly dismissed." Remember that phrase, "should not be quickly dismissed." It is a Cultural Marxist trope, a LIE to its core, but oft repeated when being challenged to entertain and accept the mythological creations of deconstructionism, that is the assault on the Church and Traditional Western Civilization.

But is this true that such things should not be quickly dismissed? Some things are so ludicrous that SANE people would NATURALLY dismiss them -However, Modern Academia and the Culture of Ignorance and Death it has created is NOT sane.

Moss continues, "Dr. Cornwall is an established scholar and one of the global leaders in the theology of intersex. Her observations reveal a great deal about our own assumptions." Did you know that "intersex" had a theology?

What were her assumptions? to wit:

“It is not possible to assert with any degree of certainty that Jesus was male as we now define maleness.” Correctly observing that it is difficult to speak definitively about the genitalia of an unmarried person with no children, she added, “There is no way of knowing for sure that Jesus did not have one of the intersex conditions which would give him a body which appeared externally to be unremarkably male, but which might nonetheless have had some ‘hidden’ female physical features.”

I have written much about the penchant of modern theologians to create "Jesuses" tailor formed to their own image, sexual proclivities, and pacifist and deconstructionist philosophies. (The Jesus Seminar being the classic example) So why would we be surprised that the sexual nonspecific fantasies of "genderism" would find a need to assault Jesus' maleness?

No surprise here, this is totally predictable. First, they turned Jesus into a non-deity, merely a pacifist and theosophical "wisdom teacher," (this is the Jesus most Protestants know and accept) next they homosexualized him, (this is the Jesus of the old Gay Agenda) next they debauched him into a bi-sexual pederast, (this is the first iteration of the Jesus of the new pagan-hedonism) boffing the young disciple John Beloved while keeping sexual company with Mary Magdeline. The latest, they pictured him in orgy scenes with his "best buds." They have also pictured him as a eunuch and now as a sexually ambiguous transgender. I can't wait for the movie.

I can just hear Handel's Massiah conformed to this dementia, "And unto her was given a sexually ambiguous trans-gender. And IT shall reign forever and ever. Queeng of Queengs, and Lordess of Lordesses." My God these people are insane! Yet they are being supported by BILLIONS of Globalist/Cultural Marxist Dollars.  Supposed "CATHOLIC" theologians tell us we should take them seriously and Politicians speak with arrogant moral superiority about the need to "finance our much-vaunted colleges and universities.

How much of Modern Academia has become Cultural Marxist Deconstructionist ROT? 
Answer . . . 
TRUTHFUL Answer - MOST of it.

My wife said to me this morning, "Why do you waste your time paying any attention to these people?" Sadly that is typical, the lack of understanding that the Future AGENDA is being written and constructed in Western Academia that has turned purely Luciferian (NOT Satanist) but, "Enlightened" and devoid all of ties to TRUTH. There is not a movement or aspect of the Christian-Deconstruction Agenda, which has created the POST-Christian era, that was not first FORMED in Academia. They are literally writing the agenda. Ask yourself, which came first, Western human beings unable to identify themselves by their biological reality, male sex or female sex? Or the decades of mythological "gender studies" at Luciferian Institutions, purporting to be institutions of "higher learning."

No comments:

Post a Comment